How Trotskyism Are You?

Should the government continue to fund the Safe Schools Coalition?

The Safe Schools Coalition is a group of organizations which promotes the acceptance of same sex attracted, intersex and gender diverse students. In 2016 the Turnbull government proposed cutting funding to the program and restricting it to secondary schools. Opponents of the program argue that parts of the group’s curriculum, including teaching 7 year olds to imagine they attracted to the same sex, are inappropriate. Proponents of the program, including the Green party, argue that between 1 and 2% of all students identify as gender diverse and the curriculum helps prevent bullying.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should terminally ill patients be allowed to end their lives via assisted suicide?

Euthanasia, the practice of ending a life prematurely in order to end pain and suffering, is currently considered a criminal offense. Euthanasia is currently illegal in Australia. In 1995 the Northern Territory passed a bill legalizing euthanasia but it was overturned by the federal government in 1998 under the Australian Capital Territory Act.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support the legalisation of same sex marriage?

Gay marriage, also known as same-sex marriage, is the marriage between two people of the same sex. The Australian government outlawed same-sex marriage when it passed the Marriage Act of 1961. The act stated that the government would not recognise same-sex marriages, traditional Aboriginal marriages or polygamous marriages. In 2016 the leaders of Australia’s major political parties voiced their support for legalizing same-sex marriage though a formal bill has yet to be introduced.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should gay couples have the same adoption rights as straight couples?

LGBT adoption is the adoption of children by lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) persons. This may be in the form of a joint adoption by a same-sex couple, adoption by one partner of a same-sex couple of the other's biological child (step-child adoption) and adoption by a single LGBT person. Joint adoption by same-sex couples is legal in 25 countries. Opponents of LGBT adoption question whether same-sex couples have the ability to be adequate parents while other opponents question whether natural law implies that children of adoption possess a natural right to be raised by heterosexual parents. Since constitutions and statutes usually fail to address the adoption rights of LGBT persons, judicial decisions often determine whether they can serve as parents either individually or as couples.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should transgender athletes be allowed to compete against athletes that differ from their assigned sex at birth?

In 2016 the International Olympic committee ruled that transgender athletes can compete in the Olympics without undergoing sex reassignment surgery. In 2018 the International Association of Athletics Federations, track’s governing body, ruled that women who have more than 5 nano-mols per liter of testosterone in their blood—like South African sprinter and Olympic gold medalist Caster Semenya—must either compete against men, or take medication to reduce their natural testosterone levels. The IAAF stated that women in the five-plus category have a “difference of sexual development.” The ruling cited a 2017 study by French researchers as proof that female athletes with testosterone closer to men do better in certain events: 400 meters, 800 meters, 1,500 meters, and the mile. "Our evidence and data show that testosterone, either naturally produced or artificially inserted into the body, provides significant performance advantages in female athletes," said IAAF President Sebastian Coe in a statement.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should people under the age of 18 years old be able to receive gender-transition treatments?

In April 2021 the legislature of the U.S. State of Arkansas introduced a bill that prohibited doctors from providing gender-transition treatments to people under 18 years old. The bill would make it a felony for doctors to administer puberty blockers, hormones and gender-reaffirming surgery to anyone under the age of 18. Opponents of the bill argue that it is an assault on transgender rights and that transition treatments are a private matter that should be decided between parents, their children and doctors. Supporters of the bill argue that children are too young to make the decision to receive gender transition treatment and only adults over the age of 18 should be allowed to do so.

Learn more Stats Discuss

What is your stance on abortion?

Abortion is a medical procedure resulting in the termination of a human pregnancy and death of a fetus. Abortion is legal in Australia in every state except for Queensland and New South Wales. Abortion is legal in every state if it is needed to protect the life of the mother.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should hate speech be protected by freedom of speech laws?

Hate speech is defined as public speech that expresses hate or encourages violence towards a person or group based on something such as race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should schools be allowed to require mandatory diversity training for teachers and faculty?

Diversity training is any program designed to facilitate positive intergroup interaction, reduce prejudice and discrimination, and generally teach individuals who are different from others how to work together effectively. On April 22, 2022, Florida Governor DeSantis signed into law the “Individual Freedom Act.” The bill prohibited schools and companies from mandating diversity training as a requirement for attendance or employment. If schools or employers violated the law they would be exposed to expanded civil liability exposures. Banned mandatory training topics include: 1. Members of one race, color, sex, or national origin are morally superior to members of another. 2. An individual, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously. Shortly after Governor DeSantis signed the bill, a group of individuals filed a lawsuit alleging that the law imposes unconstitutional viewpoint-based restrictions on speech in violation of their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the death penalty be reinstated?

The death penalty or capital punishment is the punishment by death for a crime. Currently 58 countries worldwide allow the death penalty (including the U.S.) while 97 countries have outlawed it.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should businesses be required to have women on their board of directors?

In December 2014, the German government announced a new rule which would require German companies to fill 30% of their board seats with women. In 2016 23.6% of corporate boards in Australia appointed women to fill board ships. There are currently no laws in Australia requiring boards to fill seats with women directors. In Norway 35.5% of boards contain women directors which is the highest percentage in the world.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should companies be allowed to require mandatory diversity training for employees?

Diversity training is any program designed to facilitate positive intergroup interaction, reduce prejudice and discrimination, and generally teach individuals who are different from others how to work together effectively. On April 22, 2022, Florida Governor DeSantis signed into law the “Individual Freedom Act.” The bill prohibited schools and companies from mandating diversity training as a requirement for attendance or employment. If schools or employers violated the law they would be exposed to expanded civil liability exposures. Banned mandatory training topics include: 1. Members of one race, color, sex, or national origin are morally superior to members of another. 2. An individual, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously. Shortly after Governor DeSantis signed the bill, a group of individuals filed a lawsuit alleging that the law imposes unconstitutional viewpoint-based restrictions on speech in violation of their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should schools be allowed to require mandatory diversity training for students?

Diversity training is any program designed to facilitate positive intergroup interaction, reduce prejudice and discrimination, and generally teach individuals who are different from others how to work together effectively. On April 22, 2022, Florida Governor DeSantis signed into law the “Individual Freedom Act.” The bill prohibited schools and companies from mandating diversity training as a requirement for attendance or employment. If schools or employers violated the law they would be exposed to expanded civil liability exposures. Banned mandatory training topics include: 1. Members of one race, color, sex, or national origin are morally superior to members of another. 2. An individual, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously. Shortly after Governor DeSantis signed the bill, a group of individuals filed a lawsuit alleging that the law imposes unconstitutional viewpoint-based restrictions on speech in violation of their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should women be allowed to wear a Niqāb, or face veil, to civic ceremonies?

Several Western countries including France, Spain and Canada have proposed laws which would ban Muslim women from wearing a Niqab in public spaces. A niqab is a cloth that covers the face and is worn by some Muslim women in public areas. In 2014 the Austrlian Parliament briefly debated banning women from wearing niqabs in public places. The proposal was defeated. The controversial plan to make Muslim women wearing burqas and the niqab sit in glassed enclosures at Parliament House, which has now been dumped, was put in place without any prior advice from security agencies. Proponents argue that the ban infringes on individual rights and prevents people from expressing their religious beliefs. Opponents argue that face-coverings prevent the clear identification of a person, which is both a security risk, and a social hindrance within a society which relies on facial recognition and expression in communication.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should parental leave payments increase based on the mother's wage?

Australia has introduced an 18 week paid parental leave scheme which is publicly funded and provides the federal minimum wage (currently A$596.78 per week) rather than a percentage of the primary caregiver's salary. It is not be available to families where the primary caregiver has an annual salary above $150,000 per annum.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="http://www.humanservices.gov.au/customer/services/centrelink/parental-leave-pay">Learn&nbsp;more</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;or

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should major public events include land acknowledgment statements?

Land acknowledgments have become increasingly common nationwide over the past few years. Many mainstream public events — from soccer games and performing arts productions to city council meetings and corporate conferences — begin with these formal statements recognizing Indigenous communities' rights to territories seized by colonial powers. The 2024 Democratic National Convention began with an introduction reminding delegates how the convention is being held on land that was "forcibly removed" from Indigenous tribes. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation Tribal Council Vice-Chairman Zach Pahmahmie and Tribal Council Secretary Lorrie Melchior took to the stage at the start of the convention where they welcomed the Democratic Party to their "ancestral homelands."

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support lock out laws?

In 2014, the NSW government proposed closing bars at 1:30AM to new patrons and serving the last drink at 3AM. The proposal was meant to curb late night alcohol fueled violence outside of bars and restaurants. Proponents argue that similar laws enacted in Newcastle in 2008 resulted in a 36% decline of assaults. Opponents, including the bar and restaurant industries, argue that the laws will hurt their businesses and cause them to fire employees.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should religious schools be allowed to fire teachers based on their sexuality?

This issue centers on the conflict between religious freedom and workplace anti-discrimination laws. While current laws often grant exemptions to religious bodies, debate rages over whether schools should legally be allowed to fire staff based on sexuality or gender identity. Proponents argue that faith schools must have the autonomy to employ staff who live by their moral codes to preserve the institution's ethos. Opponents argue that such exemptions amount to government-sanctioned discrimination and that no employer receiving public funds should be allowed to police an employee's private life.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the National Anti-Corruption Commission be held to a lower threshold for holding public hearings?

The National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) currently only holds public hearings in 'exceptional circumstances,' a high legal bar that has led to almost all investigations being conducted in secret. Critics argue this secrecy mirrors the protection racket politicians created for themselves, preventing voters from seeing justice done. Defenders argue that public hearings in state bodies have unfairly destroyed the careers of innocent people who were later cleared of wrongdoing. Proponents support accountability; opponents support due process privacy.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should politicians be banned from becoming lobbyists after they leave office?

The 'revolving door' phenomenon sees many senior politicians move directly into high-paying lobbying jobs for industries they previously regulated. Concerns focus on whether politicians make decisions in office to secure future employment, and whether they use their insider connections to give private clients undue influence over public policy. Proponents of a ban (often 3-5 years) argue it is essential to prevent corruption and restore trust in democracy. Opponents argue that cooling-off periods restrict a person's right to earn a living and rob the private sector of legitimate regulatory expertise.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should welfare recipients be tested for drugs?

In 2014 the government denied a proposal to subject welfare recipients to drug testing. Proponents including Liberal-National Party MP George Christensen argued that anyone receiving taxpayer funded benefits should be able to demonstrate that they are drug-free. Opponents, including Greens MP Adam Bandt, argued that if welfare recipients were subject to testing MPs should be as well.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should Australia raise taxes on the rich?

The top income tax bracket in Australia includes all incomes over $181,000 and is taxed between 30.3% and 45%. Individuals making $180,000 are taxed $65,000 plus $.45 for each $1 earned over $180,000. An individual making more than $500,000 would pay a tax rate of 59% in Australia, 57% in the UK, 60% in the US and 73% in Brazil.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support a universal basic income program?

A Universal Basic Income program is social security program where all citizens of a country receive a regular, unconditional sum of money from the government. The funding for Universal Basic Income comes from taxation and government owned entities including income from endowments, real estate and natural resources. Several countries, including Finland, India and Brazil, have experimented with a UBI system but have not implemented a permanent program. The longest running UBI system in the world is the Alaska Permanent Fund in the U.S. state of Alaska. In the Alaska Permanent Fund each individual and family receives a monthly sum that is funded by dividends from the state’s oil revenues. Proponents of UBI argue that it will reduce or eliminate poverty by providing everyone with a basic income to cover housing and food. Opponents argue that a UBI would be detrimental to economies by encouraging people to either work less or drop out of the workforce entirely.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government ban negative gearing?

Negative gearing is the practice of using losses on property investments to reduce taxable income. In 2013, approximately 1.3 million Australians used the concession. Data shows that high income earners write off much larger percentages of their taxes than those who earn lower wages. In 2012, surgeons wrote off $4,161 of their taxes using negative gearing while teachers wrote off $327. Proponents, including Malcolm Turnbull, argue that the practice has been part of Australian tax law since 1915 and is not a tax break since the real estate investor is taking a loss to their assets. Opponents argue that the policy disproportionately benefits Australians in high-paying occupations, not those of average incomes, since they are much more likely to own investment properties.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you believe trade unions help or hurt the economy?

Since 1996 Union membership in Australia has dropped from 40% of all workers to 15%. Unions bargain on behalf of workers over wages, benefits, working conditions for their membership. Larger unions also typically engage in lobbying activities and electioneering at the state and federal level.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support Malcolm Turnbull’s $50 billion corporate tax cut?

In June 2016, Malcolm Turnbull proposed a 10 year $50 billion corporate tax cut. If re-elected, Turnbull would reduce the tax rate on companies who earn less than $10 million by 1% to 27.5%. The following year the tax cut would apply to companies who earn less than $25m. Turnbull plans to pay for the cuts by reducing the number of superannuation tax concessions.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support an increase in the mineral resources rent tax?

The Minerals Resource Rent Tax came into effect on July 1, 2012. It is a 22.5 per cent tax on the profits of iron ore and coal projects but only applies to profits over $75 million. There have been calls on different sides to both abolish and expand the tax.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should there be fewer or more restrictions on current welfare benefits?

In 2011 the level of public spending on the welfare state by the British Government accounted for £113.1 billion, or 16% of government. By 2020 welfare spending will rise to 1/3rd of all spending making it the largest expense followed by housing benefit, council tax benefit, benefits to the unemployed, and benefits to people with low incomes.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government make cuts to public spending in order to reduce the national debt?

The 2015 Australian Federal Budget was the eight in a row which contained a budget deficit. The deficit grew 7% to $37.4 billion. A $4.4 billion family aid package, a $5.5 billion small business package and slowing mineral exports were the largest contributors to the increased deficit. The largest cuts were made to foreign aid which decreased by 29% from 2014. Proponents of deficit reduction argue that governments who do not control budget deficits and debt are at risk of losing their ability to borrow money at affordable rates. Opponents of deficit reduction argue that government spending would increase demand for goods and services and help avert a dangerous fall into deflation, a downward spiral in wages and prices that can cripple an economy for years.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government enforce a cap on CEO pay relative to the pay of their employees?

This policy would limit the amount a CEO can earn compared to the average salary of their employees. Proponents argue that it would reduce income inequality and ensure fairer compensation practices. Opponents argue that it would interfere with business autonomy and could discourage top executive talent.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should bankers’ bonuses be capped at 100% of their pay?

In 2014, the EU passed legislation that capped bankers' bonuses at 100% of their pay or 200% with shareholder approval. There are currently no caps on banker's pay in Australia. Proponents of the cap say that it will reduce incentives for bankers to take excessive risk similar to what led to the 2008 financial crisis. Opponents say that any cap on bankers' pay will push up non-bonus pay and cause bank's costs to rise.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should Australian citizens be allowed to save or invest their money in offshore bank accounts?

An offshore (or foreign) bank account is a bank account you have outside of your country of residence. The benefits of an offshore bank account include tax reduction, privacy, currency diversification, asset protection from lawsuits, and reducing your political risk. In April 2017, Wikileaks released 11.5 million confidential documents, known as the Panama Papers, which provided detailed information on 214,000 offshore companies serviced by the Panamanian Law Firm, Mossack Fonesca. The document exposed how world leaders and wealthy individuals hide money in secret offshore tax shelters. The release of the documents renewed proposals for laws banning the use of offshore accounts and tax havens. The Australian Tax Office identified more than 800 individuals who were using the law firms services. Proponents of the of the ban argue they should be outlawed because they have a long history of being vehicles for tax evasion, money laundering, illicit arms dealing and funding terrorism. Opponents of the ban argue that punitive regulations will make it harder for Austrian companies to compete and will further discourage businesses from locating and investing in the United States.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government reinstate the Building and Construction Commission (ABCC)?

In 2015 the Senate blocked the passage of a bill which would have restored the Building and Construction Commission. The agency was responsible for monitoring and promoting workplace relations in the building and construction industry. The ABCC provided education, investigated workplace complaints and enforced compliance with national workplace laws in the industry. The agency was abolished in 2012 after unions successfully lobbied the government to dismantle it.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government tax stock buybacks?

Stock buybacks are the re-acquisition by a company of its own shares. It represents an alternate and more flexible way (relative to dividends) of returning money to shareholders. When used in coordination with increased corporate leverage, buybacks can increase share price. In most countries, a corporation can repurchase its own stock by distributing cash to existing shareholders in exchange for a fraction of the company's outstanding equity; that is, cash is exchanged for a reduction in the number of shares outstanding. The company either retires the repurchased shares or keeps them as treasury stock, available for re-issuance. Proponents of the tax argue that buybacks substitute for productive investments, thereby harming the economy and its growth prospects. Opponents argue that a 2016 Harvard Business Review study showed that research and development and capital expenditures soared over the same period when shareholder payouts and stock buybacks were rising sharply.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government add or increase tariffs on products imported into the country?

A tariff is a tax on imports or exports between countries.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government increase taxes on private equity executives?

Stats Discuss

Should the Australian government continue to invest billions of dollars into the development of the National Broadband Network?

The National Broadband Network is currently under construction and will eventually provide fast internet access to a majority of Australians. By July 2016 25% of all homes will have access to the network. 75% of all homes should have access by the fall of 2018. Opponents of the network argue that the project is severely over budget and should be turned over to private companies. Proponents of the network argue that fast internet at a low cost is necessary to grow the Australian economy.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government classify cryptocurrencies as legal forms of payment?

Cryptocurrencies are a collection of binary data which is designed to work as a medium of exchange wherein individual coin ownership records are stored on a public ledger using strong cryptography to secure transaction records, to control the creation of additional coins, and to verify the transfer of ownership.  Watch video

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government implement a national identification system to enhance security and prevent fraud?

A national identification system is a standardized ID system that provides a unique identification number or card to all citizens, which can be used to verify identity and access various services. Proponents argue that it enhances security, streamlines identification processes, and helps prevent identity fraud. Opponents argue that it raises privacy concerns, could lead to increased government surveillance, and may infringe on individual freedoms.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government require tech companies to provide backdoor access to encrypted communications for national security purposes?

Backdoor access means that tech companies would create a way for government authorities to bypass encryption, allowing them to access private communications for surveillance and investigation. Proponents argue that it helps law enforcement and intelligence agencies prevent terrorism and criminal activities by providing necessary access to information. Opponents argue that it compromises user privacy, weakens overall security, and could be exploited by malicious actors.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government use facial recognition technology for mass surveillance to enhance public safety?

Facial recognition technology uses software to identify individuals based on their facial features, and can be used to monitor public spaces and enhance security measures. Proponents argue that it enhances public safety by identifying and preventing potential threats, and helps in locating missing persons and criminals. Opponents argue that it infringes on privacy rights, can lead to misuse and discrimination, and raises significant ethical and civil liberties concerns.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government ban its citizens from using cross-border payment methods (like crypto) to send money to relatives in OFAC sanctioned countries (Palestine, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, and North Korea)?

Cross-border payment methods, such as cryptocurrencies, allow individuals to transfer money internationally, often bypassing traditional banking systems. The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctions countries for various political and security reasons, restricting financial transactions with these nations. Proponents argue that such a ban prevents financial support to regimes considered hostile or dangerous, ensuring compliance with international sanctions and national security policies. Opponents argue that it restricts humanitarian aid to families in need, infringes on personal freedoms, and that cryptocurrencies can provide a lifeline in crisis situations.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government invest in artificial intelligence (AI) for defense applications?

AI in defense refers to the use of artificial intelligence technologies to enhance military capabilities, such as autonomous drones, cyber defense, and strategic decision-making. Proponents argue that AI can significantly enhance military effectiveness, provide strategic advantages, and improve national security. Opponents argue that AI poses ethical risks, potential loss of human control, and can lead to unintended consequences in critical situations.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support building a nuclear waste storage facility in the Northern Territory?

Disposing of low-level nuclear waste, mostly from medical treatment, has become an important issue. In 2009, the Australian government received a consultant’s report that examined Muckaty Station as one of four possible sites for a nuclear waste facility in the Northern Territory. Land owners near Muckaty station opposed the plan in fear that the dumped waste would destroy their lands and environment.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government increase environmental regulations on businesses to reduce carbon emissions?

Global warming, or climate change, is an increase in the earth’s atmospheric temperature since the late nineteenth century. In politics, the debate over global warming is centered on whether this increase in temperature is due to greenhouse gas emissions or is the result of a natural pattern in the earth’s temperature. Australia is currently looking to reduce emissions to 26-28% on 2005 levels by 2030.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should disposable products (such as plastic cups, plates, and cutlery) that contain less than 50% of biodegradable material be banned?

In 2016, France became the first country to ban the sale of plastic disposable products that contain less than 50% of biodegradable material and in 2017, India passed a law banning all plastic disposable plastic products.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government allow Coal Seam Gas (CSG) projects in Australia?

Australia has large reserves of coal seam gas, especially in Queensland, New South Wales and Victoria, while large shale gas deposits exist across the Northern Territory, South Australia and Western Australia. CSG is currently being extracted from the Bowen and Surat Basins in Queensland and the Camden Valley in New South Wales, with numerous exploration wells across the Liverpool Plains and Hunter Valley. To extract the gas, water, sand and chemicals are injected into the rock at high pressure in a process known as "fracking."

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support the use of hydraulic fracking to extract oil and natural gas resources?

Fracking is the process of extracting oil or natural gas from shale rock. Water, sand and chemicals are injected into the rock at high pressure which fractures the rock and allows the oil or gas to flow out to a well. While fracking has significantly boosted oil production, there are environmental concerns that the process is contaminating groundwater. Critics of fracking say it pollutes underground water supplies with chemicals, releases methane gas into the atmosphere, and can cause seismic activity. Proponents of fracking say it will drop oil and gas prices in Spain and lead to energy independence.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should researchers be allowed to use animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics?

Stats Discuss

Should the government fund research into geoengineering as a way to combat climate change?

Geoengineering refers to the deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth's climate system to counteract climate change, such as by reflecting sunlight, increasing precipitation, or removing CO2 from the atmosphere. Proponents argue that geoengineering could provide innovative solutions to global warming. Opponents argue that it is risky, unproven, and could have unforeseen negative consequences.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government build a network of electric vehicle charging stations?

In 2022 the European Union, Canada, the U.K. and the U.S. state of California approved regulations banning the sale of new gasoline-powered cars and trucks by 2035. Plug-in hybrids, full electrics and hydrogen cell vehicles would all count toward the zero-emission targets, though auto makers will only be able to use plug-in hybrids to meet 20% of the overall requirement. The regulation will impact only new-vehicle sales and affects only manufacturers, not dealerships. Traditional internal-combustion vehicles will still be legal to own and drive after 2035, and new models can still be sold until 2035. Volkswagen and Toyota have said they aim to sell only zero-emission cars in Europe by that time.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government provide subsidies to taxpayers who purchase an electric vehicle?

Joe Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in August 2022, which allocated millions to combating climate change and other energy provisions while additionally establishing a $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicles.  To qualify for the subsidy 40% of the critical minerals used in electric-vehicle batteries must be sourced in the U.S.  EU and South Korean officials argues that the subsidies discriminated against their automotive, renewable-energy, battery and energy-intensive industries. Proponents argue that the tax credits will help combat climate change by encouraging consumers to purchase EVs and stop driving gas powered automobiles. Opponents argue that the tax credits will only hurt domestic battery and EV producers.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government allow the mining and export of Uranium?

Australia is currently the world’s largest exporter of Uranium and currently exports 31% of the global supply. Australia’s current policy is to only sell uranium to countries which have signed the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government implement a nationwide lethal culling program to eradicate millions of feral cats?

Feral cats kill billions of native Australian animals every year and are a leading driver of mammalian extinctions across the continent. To combat this, conservationists and the government often deploy lethal measures, including shooting, trapping, and using poison-laced sausages. Proponents argue that aggressive eradication is a tragic but mathematically necessary intervention to save native species that have not evolved to evade feline predators. Opponents argue that mass slaughter is ethically abhorrent, often inadvertently poisons native wildlife, and that humane alternatives like sterilization should be prioritized.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government ban the approval of new coal and gas projects?

For over a decade, Australian politics has been defined by the "climate wars," a fierce debate over balancing the nation's immense wealth from mining exports with the urgent global need to decarbonize. With the rise of "Teal" independents and Green activism, the pressure to stop all new extraction sites has become a central wedge issue. Proponents argue that approving new projects locks in decades of warming and creates "stranded assets" that will become worthless as the world transitions to net zero. Opponents argue that Australian coal and gas are cleaner than the alternatives and that banning them would devastate the economy, spike energy bills, and cost thousands of regional jobs.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government remove shark nets from beaches to protect marine life?

Shark nets have been a fixture on Australian coastlines since the 1930s, designed to disrupt shark territories rather than create a complete physical barrier. While they are credited with reducing fatal attacks, they are increasingly criticized for indiscriminately trapping and killing non-target marine life, including endangered turtles, dolphins, and migrating whales. The debate centers on whether the perceived safety of swimmers justifies the ecological cost to marine biodiversity. Proponents support the nets as a necessary, proven measure to prioritize human life and protect the vital tourism economy from the fear of shark attacks. Opponents oppose the nets, arguing they are archaic "walls of death" that should be replaced by modern, non-lethal alternatives like drone surveillance and smart drumlines.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the logging of native forests be banned nationwide?

Native forest logging refers to the harvesting of timber from natural, non-plantation forests. While Victoria and Western Australia have moved to ban the practice, it remains a contentious issue in states like Tasmania and New South Wales. Environmentalists argue that logging native forests destroys irreplaceable ecosystems, pushes species like the Greater Glider and Koala toward extinction, and releases stored carbon. Industry advocates argue that Australian forestry is world-leading in sustainability, that timber is a renewable resource needed for construction, and that shutting down the industry decimates rural communities.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should fossil fuel companies be banned from sponsoring national sports teams and arts organizations?

Fossil fuel sponsorship of sports and arts has become a major flashpoint, drawing comparisons to historical tobacco advertising bans. Proponents argue that allowing coal, oil, and gas giants to plaster their logos on beloved sports jerseys provides them with unearned social license and greenwashes their contribution to climate change. Opponents argue that severing these lucrative corporate lifelines will financially devastate grassroots clubs and elite sporting codes, while unfairly demonizing an industry that is still entirely legal and vital to the national economy.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government double the tax rate on superannuation balances exceeding three million dollars?

The Labor government introduced legislation to double the concessional tax rate from 15 percent to 30 percent on earnings for superannuation balances over three million dollars. Proponents argue the current system disproportionately shelters billionaire wealth and costs the budget billions in lost revenue. Opponents argue this breaks a promise not to touch super, taxes unrealized capital gains, and penalizes financial success.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government allow the sale of Australian agricultural land and water to foreign buyers?

In 2015 the Australian government Thursday blocked the sale of a large portfolio of farmland to Chinese investors on national interest grounds. Four separate groups linked to Chinese-based investors were denied from bidding on properties that amounted to 2.5% of Australia’s farming land owned by S. Kidman & Co. The proposed sale had become a test case for how the country balances concerns over foreign ownership with the need for foreign investment in an economy that has slowed sharply due to the collapse in commodity prices this year.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support the use of genetically engineered crops and foods?

Genetically modified foods (or GM foods) are foods produced from organisms that have had specific changes introduced into their DNA using the methods of genetic engineering. Australia already allows the commercial growing of genetically engineered canola and cotton, making us one of only a handful of countries that commercially grow GE crops. GE canola was commercially released in NSW and Victoria in 2008.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should a politician who has been formerly convicted of a crime be allowed to run for office?

The U.S. constitution does not prevent convicted felons from holding the office of the President or a seat in the Senate or House of Representatives. States may prevent convicted felons candidates from holding statewide and local offices.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should foreigners currently residing in Australia have the right to vote?

In most countries, suffrage, the right to vote, is generally limited to citizens of the country. Some countries, however, extend limited voting rights to resident non-citizens.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the minimum voting age be lowered?

Stats Discuss

Should political parties receive money from the government?

Stats Discuss

Should political candidates be required to release their recent tax returns to the public?

A tax return is a document which states how much income an individual or entity reported to the government. In Australia these documents are considered private and are not released to the public. The Australian Election Commission does not require individuals standing as a candidate to release them. In Sweden, Norway and Finland citizen’s and candidate’s tax records are considered public information and are published on the internet.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should voters be required to present photo identification at the polling booth?

Currently, Australian voters simply state their name and address to receive a ballot. Proponents of Voter ID argue that this loose system is vulnerable to fraud and that tightening it aligns Australia with many other democracies that require identification. Opponents argue that in-person fraud is statistically non-existent in Australia and that adding bureaucratic hurdles will discourage voting among remote Indigenous communities, the homeless, and the elderly, effectively skewing election results in favor of conservatives.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should political parties be legally required to prove the truthfulness of their election advertisements?

Currently, federal law in Australia does not require political advertising to be truthful, meaning parties can legally make misleading claims during an election campaign. Reformers are pushing for "truth in political advertising" laws, similar to those in South Australia, which would allow an independent body to ban ads found to be materially false. Proponents say this is necessary to prevent misinformation from hijacking democracy and eroding trust in institutions. Opponents argue that regulating political speech is dangerous, as defining "truth" in political debate is difficult and could lead to censorship or partisan bias by the regulators.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should politicians over 75 years of age have required to pass a mental competency test?

Countries that have mandatory retirements for politicians include Argentina (age 75), Brazil (75 for judges and prosecutors), Mexico (70 for judges and prosecutors) and Singapore (75 for members of parliament.)

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should corporations, unions, and non-profit organizations be allowed to donate to political parties?

Stats Discuss

Do you support the legalisation of Marijuana?

On February 24, 2016 the Australian parliament passed an amendment to the Narcotic Drugs Act which legalised medical marijuana. The amendment permits patients with a prescription from a doctor to posses and use medical cannabis. The cannabis must be grown in Australia under the supervision of the local government. Analysts predict that marijuana will be available to patients beginning in 2017.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government fund the World Health Organization?

The World Health Organization was founded in 1948 and is a specialized agency of the United Nations whose main objective is “the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health.” The organization provides technical assistance to countries, sets international health standards and guidelines, and collects data on global health issues through the World Health Survey. The WHO has led global public health efforts including the development of an Ebola Vaccine and the near-eradication of polio and smallpox. The organization is run by a decision-making body composed of representatives from 194 countries. It is funded by voluntary contributions from member countries and private donors. In 2018 and 2019 the WHO had a $5 billion budget and the leading contributors were the United States (15%) , the EU (11%) and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation (9%). Supporters of the WHO argue that cutting funding will hamper the international fight against the Covid-19 pandemic and sap the U.S. of global influence.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should cities open drug “safe havens” where people who are addicted to illegal drugs can use them under the supervision of medical professionals?

In 2018, officials in the U.S. city of Philadelphia city proposed opening a “safe haven” in an effort to combat the city's heroin epidemic. In 2016 64,070 people died in the U.S. from drug overdoses - a 21% increase from 2015. 3/4 of drug overdose deaths in the U.S. are caused by the opioid class of drugs which includes prescription painkillers, heroin and fentanyl. To combat the epidemic cities including Vancouver, BC and Sydney, AUS opened safe havens where addicts can inject drugs under the supervision of medical professionals. The safe havens reduce the overdose death rate by insuring the addicted patients are given drugs that are not contaminated or poisoned. Since 2001 5,900 people have overdosed at a safe haven in Sydney, Australia but no one has died. Proponents argue that the safe havens are the only proven solution to lower the overdose fatality rate and prevent the spread of diseases like HIV-AIDS. Opponents argue that safe havens may encourage illegal drug use and re-direct funding from traditional treatment centers.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should medical boards penalize doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus?

In 2022 lawmakers in the U.S. state of California passed legislation which empowered the state medical board to discipline doctors in the state who “disseminate misinformation or disinformation” that contradicts the “contemporary scientific consensus” or is “contrary to the standard of care.” Proponents of the law argue that doctors should be punished for spreading misinformation and that there is clear consensus on certain issues such as that apples contain sugar, measles is caused by a virus, and Down syndrome is caused by a chromosomal abnormality. Opponents argue that the law limits freedom of speech and scientific “consensus” often changes within mere months.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should hospitals continue to be funded on fee-for-service model?

Australian hospitals are currently allocated funding on a fixed price for each treatment they provide. Proponents see this plan as making hospitals more efficient and providing an equal level of care. Opponents believe it causes hospitals to offer more expensive treatments in order to maximize their profits.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should pharmacists be allowed to prescribe everyday medications without requiring patients to consult a doctor?

The Australian healthcare system is currently buckling under a critical shortage of General Practitioners, leading to long wait times and rising out-of-pocket costs for basic medical care. To alleviate this bottleneck, several state governments have trialed letting pharmacists diagnose and prescribe medications for uncomplicated conditions like urinary tract infections, skin ailments, and contraceptive resupplies. Proponents argue this modernizes the health system by utilizing highly trained pharmacists to free up doctors for complex cases. Opponents argue it fragments patient care, increases the risk of misdiagnosis due to less clinical training, and introduces a dangerous financial conflict of interest where pharmacies profit from the very medications they prescribe.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should AI be allowed to diagnose patients and prescribe medicine without human doctor supervision?

Stats Discuss

Should the government restore the number of Medicare-subsidized psychology sessions from 10 back to 20 per year?

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the 'Better Access' initiative temporarily doubled the number of subsidized psychology sessions from 10 to 20. In 2023, the government reverted this cap to 10, citing an independent review that claimed the extra sessions were clogging up the system and preventing new patients from getting appointments. Mental health advocates were outraged, arguing that complex trauma requires consistent care, not just a 'band-aid'. Proponents of the cut argue it ensures more people get at least some care; opponents say it abandons the most vulnerable.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should psychiatrists be allowed to prescribe MDMA and magic mushrooms to treat severe mental health conditions?

In 2023, Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) became the first regulatory body globally to allow authorized psychiatrists to prescribe MDMA for PTSD and psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression. This controversial move sparked massive global interest, blending cutting-edge neuroplasticity science with counterculture legacy. Known colloquially as 'shrooms' or 'ecstasy,' these drugs are administered alongside intense psychotherapy, costing upwards of $20,000 per patient. Proponents support this because it offers a rare, scientifically backed silver bullet for veterans and trauma survivors who have exhausted all other medical options. Opponents oppose this because they fear moving too quickly without long-term safety data risks severe psychological damage and normalizes dangerous recreational narcotics.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government ban the sale of recreational e-cigarettes (vapes)?

Australia is currently at the forefront of the global vaping crackdown, having moved to a strict 'pharmacy-only' model that effectively bans recreational sales. The government argues that bright, fruity vapes are a cynical trap designed by Big Tobacco to hook a new generation of children on nicotine. Opponents, including the Nationals and Libertarian parties, argue that the ban has failed, pointing to a thriving black market, firebombed tobacco shops, and a loss of tax revenue. Supporters believe strict controls are necessary to prevent a public health crisis among youth. Critics argue that legalization and regulation, rather than prohibition, is the only way to ensure product safety and destroy the illicit market.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should there be more or less privatisation of hospital and healthcare services?

Private health insurance funds private health and is provided by a number of private health insurance organisations, called health funds. The Coalition under Tony pledged to privatise Medibank if it won the 2010 election but was again defeated by Labor. Privatisation was again a Coalition policy for the 2013 election, which the Coalition won.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government regulate the prices of life-saving drugs?

The Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) consumes around 14 percent of total government health care expenditures and has grown substantially in both range of drugs covered, and expenditure since it was first introduced in 1950. Proponents of drug price regulation argue that drug makers raise prices to benefit the value of their stock and invest little of their profits in the development and research of new drugs. Opponents of regulation argue that consumers rely on drug companies to develop new drugs and limiting prices will prevent new lifesaving drugs from being developed.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government increase funding for mental health research and treatment?

Since 2009 federal funding for mental health has increased over the past seven years by $1.5 billion. Australia spends 8% of it’s health budget on mental health services. This is less than the majority of developed countries who spend between 12% and 18% of their budget on mental health. Proponents of more spending on mental health point out that schizophrenia is a major problem in Australia’s Aboriginal communities where it is three times higher than in cities.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should nurse to patient ratios be increased?

In 2019, NSW Labor party Michael Daley proposed a tax on luxury cars worth more than $100,000 and yachts worth more than $200,000 to raise $240 million. The additional tax review would be used to increase funding for nurse staffing. The proposal would insure one nurse for every three patients in major emergency departments, one midwife for every three mothers in postnatal wards and one nurse to each patient in adult and pediatric resuscitation beds.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Are you in favour of universal dental care?

In 2012 the government implemented a dental plan that would allocate $4 billion in funding through 2018. The program will provide dental services to children, Medicare recipients and low income adults who live in rural areas.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support a single-payer healthcare system?

Single-payer healthcare is a system where every citizen pays the government to provide core healthcare services for all residents. Under this system the government may provide the care themselves or pay a private healthcare provider to do so. In a single-payer system all residents receive healthcare regardless of age, income or health status. Countries with single-payer healthcare systems include the U.K., Canada, Taiwan, Israel, France, Belarus, Russia and Ukraine.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government ban the promotion of products that contribute to unhealthy lifestyles for young people, such as vaping and junk food?

Vaping refers to using electronic cigarettes that deliver nicotine through vapor, while junk food includes high-calorie, low-nutrition foods like candy, chips, and sugary drinks. Both are linked to various health issues, especially among young people. Proponents argue that banning promotion helps protect the health of young people, reduces the risk of developing lifelong unhealthy habits, and decreases public health costs. Opponents argue that such bans infringe on commercial free speech, limit consumer choice, and that education and parental guidance are more effective ways to promote healthy lifestyles.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the federal government turn over school funding to the states?

In 2016, Prime Minster Turnbull suggested that education funding should shift from the federal government to the states if they are able to raise more revenue under his proposed tax plan. The plan was opposed by the Labor and Green parties who argued that it would abandon the need-based funding reforms put in place after the Gonski report was released in 2012. Without federal funding, they argued, states with economically disadvantaged students would fall further behind. Proponent argue that the Department of Education is too large and states would do a better job of managing schools.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support charter schools?

Charter schools are tax payer funded K-12 schools that are managed by private companies. In Australia 30% of high school students are enrolled in private schools. All Australian private schools have received some federal government funding since the 1970s. Since 2010, the government has tested an initiative in Western Australia called the Independent Public School (IPS) Initiative. The federal government has shown interest in rolling out the IPS initiative nationwide.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government cap international student enrollments to relieve the housing shortage?

The government has proposed strict caps on international student enrollments to ease pressure on the rental market and infrastructure. Critics argue this targets a symptom rather than the root cause of housing supply and threatens Australia's $48 billion international education sector. Proponents believe reducing migration numbers is the fastest way to free up housing for struggling residents. Opponents warn that universities rely on international fees to cross-subsidize domestic research and teaching, and cuts could lead to job losses.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government wipe all outstanding HECS/HELP student debt?

The HECS/HELP system is Australia's income-contingent loan scheme. While interest-free, loans are 'indexed' to inflation, causing debts to spike by 7.1% in 2023. Proponents argue debt delays young people from buying homes, calling it generational theft. Opponents argue the system is fair, and taxpayers without degrees shouldn't subsidize graduates' higher lifetime earnings.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the federal government stop funding religious chaplains in public schools?

The National School Chaplaincy Program (NSCP) provides federal funds for schools to employ chaplains who support student wellbeing through pastoral care. While participation is voluntary for schools, the program has sparked long-standing debate regarding the separation of church and state in public education. Proponents argue that chaplains offer an approachable, informal layer of support that complements professional mental health services and helps guide youth morality. Opponents argue that public funds should be exclusively dedicated to qualified secular professionals, such as psychologists or social workers, to ensure inclusivity and professional standards in student care.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government mandate a nationwide ban on student mobile phones in all primary and secondary schools?

A growing number of Australian states have introduced policies restricting mobile phone use in public schools to combat classroom distraction and declining mental health. These 'off and away all day' policies aim to create a safer, more engaged learning environment with immediate improvements in student behavior. Supporters argue that a strict ban forces students to socialize face-to-face and removes a toxic source of anxiety and cyberbullying from the educational setting. Opponents argue that a blanket ban is a logistical nightmare for teachers to enforce, removes a vital safety lifeline for anxious parents, and fails to prepare teenagers for a modern digital workplace.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should universities set their own fees?

In October 2015, Education Minister Simon Birmingham revealed a proposal that would cut funding to universities and deregulate the fees that they charge students. The Parliamentary Budget Office estimated that tuition fees would increase by 40% if universities were allowed to set them without government regulation. Proponents, including Mr. Birmingham, argue that the cost of university funding has grown at twice the rate of the economy since 2009. Opponents argue that the PBO’s estimate of 40% is too low and tuition fees will easily double or triple if the government ceases to regulate them.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should universities be held financially accountable if graduates, with degrees leading to lower income jobs, default on their student loans?

Stats Discuss

Should the government provide free universal childcare for all families?

Australian parents face some of the highest out-of-pocket childcare costs in the OECD, which economists argue acts as a 'tax' on women returning to work. A universal free model would likely cost the budget over $10 billion annually but could significantly boost GDP by increasing workforce participation. Supporters view early learning as essential education that should be free like public school. Opponents argue it is an unfair wealth transfer that forces taxpayers to subsidize the lifestyle choices of others while penalizing parents who sacrifice income to raise their children at home.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the state governments buy back privatized electricity grids to lower energy bills?

In the 1990s and 2000s, several Australian states privatized their electricity networks, promising that free-market competition would lower prices and improve service. However, as energy bills have skyrocketed, many voters and progressive politicians argue that privatization was a failed experiment that prioritized corporate monopolies over public utility. Proponents of buying back the grid argue that state ownership eliminates the profit motive, ensuring cheaper and more reliable power for everyone. Opponents argue that a multi-billion dollar buyback would bankrupt state budgets, and that government-run bureaucracies are inherently less efficient at managing complex modern energy grids than private enterprise.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government promote the use of bicycles by expanding bike lanes and bike-sharing programs?

Expanding bike lanes and bike-sharing programs encourages cycling as a sustainable and healthy mode of transportation. Proponents argue that it reduces traffic congestion, lowers emissions, and promotes a healthier lifestyle. Opponents argue that it can be costly, may take away road space from vehicles, and might not be widely used.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government implement stricter emissions standards for diesel vehicles?

Diesel emissions standards regulate the amount of pollutants that diesel engines can emit to reduce air pollution. Proponents argue that stricter standards improve air quality and public health by reducing harmful emissions. Opponents argue that it increases costs for manufacturers and consumers and could reduce the availability of diesel vehicles.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government require all new cars to be electric or hybrid by a certain date?

Electric and hybrid vehicles use electricity and a combination of electricity and fuel, respectively, to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and decrease emissions. Proponents argue that it significantly cuts pollution and advances the transition to renewable energy sources. Opponents argue that it increases vehicle costs, limits consumer choice, and may strain the electric grid.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government increase spending on public transportation?

Stats Discuss

Should the government increase penalties for distracted driving?

Distracted driving penalties aim to deter dangerous behaviors, such as texting while driving, to improve road safety. Proponents argue that it deters dangerous behavior, improves road safety, and reduces accidents caused by distractions. Opponents argue that penalties alone may not be effective and enforcement can be challenging.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government impose stricter fuel efficiency standards on vehicles?

Fuel efficiency standards set the required average fuel economy for vehicles, aiming to reduce fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Proponents argue that it helps reduce emissions, save consumers money on fuel, and decrease reliance on fossil fuels. Opponents argue that it raises production costs, leading to higher vehicle prices, and may not have a significant impact on overall emissions.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government provide incentives for carpooling and the use of shared transportation services?

Incentives for carpooling and shared transportation encourage people to share rides, reducing the number of vehicles on the road and lowering emissions. Proponents argue that it reduces traffic congestion, lowers emissions, and promotes community interactions. Opponents argue that it may not significantly impact traffic, could be costly, and some people prefer the convenience of personal vehicles.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government subsidize ride-sharing services for low-income individuals?

Ride-sharing services, like Uber and Lyft, provide transportation options that can be subsidized to make them more affordable for low-income individuals. Proponents argue that it increases mobility for low-income individuals, reduces reliance on personal vehicles, and can reduce traffic congestion. Opponents argue that it is a misuse of public funds, may benefit ride-sharing companies more than individuals, and could discourage public transportation use.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government regulate the development and deployment of autonomous vehicles?

Autonomous vehicles, or self-driving cars, use technology to navigate and operate without human intervention. Proponents argue that regulations ensure safety, promote innovation, and prevent accidents caused by technology failures. Opponents argue that regulations could stifle innovation, delay deployment, and impose excessive burdens on developers.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government restrict the use of advanced technology in vehicles to maintain human control and prevent over-reliance on technology?

This considers limiting the integration of advanced technologies in vehicles to ensure humans retain control and to prevent dependency on technological systems. Proponents argue that it preserves human control and prevents over-reliance on potentially fallible technology. Opponents argue that it hinders technological progress and the benefits that advanced technology can bring to safety and efficiency.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government regulate airline frequent flier programs?

In September 2024 the U.S. Transportation Department began an investigation into U.S. airline’s frequent flier programs. The department's inquiry centers on practices that it describes as potentially unfair, deceptive or anti-competitive, with a focus on four areas: changes to the value of points that the agency said can make it more expensive to book tickets using rewards; lack of fare transparency through dynamic pricing; fees for redeeming and transferring rewards; and reduction in competition among programs due to airline mergers.  “These rewards are controlled by a company that can unilaterally change their value. Our goal is to ensure consumers are getting the value that was promised to them, which means validating that these programs are transparent and fair,” Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should car manufacturers be penalized if they sell too many gas-guzzling vehicles?

This issue centers on the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES), a policy designed to catch Australia up to the US and Europe by capping total emissions across a manufacturer's fleet. While not a direct tax on consumers, manufacturers selling high-emission vehicles (like popular Ford Rangers or Toyota Hiluxes) without offsetting them with EV sales would face fines, costs likely passed on to buyers. Proponents argue Australia is becoming a dumping ground for inefficient cars and that this policy will unlock cheaper EV choices for families. Opponents, including industry lobbyists and conservative parties, brand it a "Ute Tax" that will hike the price of the essential work vehicles used by tradespeople and farmers by thousands of dollars.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government replace the fuel tax with a fee charged for every kilometer you drive?

As electric vehicles (EVs) become more popular, revenue from the traditional fuel excise tax—which funds road repairs—is plummeting. Governments are proposing a "Road User Charge" to fill this black hole, charging drivers based on distance traveled rather than fuel consumed. Privacy advocates fear this requires GPS tracking that gives the state too much data on citizen movements. A proponent supports this to ensure EV drivers contribute to road upkeep; an opponent opposes this to prevent government surveillance and increased costs for commuters.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government eliminate all traffic laws and rely on voluntary compliance?

This considers the idea of removing government-imposed traffic laws and relying instead on individual responsibility for road safety. Proponents argue that voluntary compliance respects individual freedom and personal responsibility. Opponents argue that without traffic laws, road safety would significantly decline and accidents would increase.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government require public transportation systems to be fully accessible to people with disabilities?

Full accessibility ensures that public transportation accommodates people with disabilities by providing necessary facilities and services. Proponents argue that it ensures equal access, promotes independence for people with disabilities, and complies with disability rights. Opponents argue that it can be costly to implement and maintain and may require significant modifications to existing systems.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government provide subsidies for the development of high-speed rail networks?

High-speed rail networks are fast train systems that connect major cities, providing a quick and efficient alternative to car and air travel. Proponents argue that it can reduce travel times, lower carbon emissions, and stimulate economic growth through improved connectivity. Opponents argue that it requires significant investment, may not attract enough users, and funds could be better used elsewhere.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government invest in the development of smart transportation infrastructure?

Smart transportation infrastructure uses advanced technology, such as smart traffic lights and connected vehicles, to improve traffic flow and safety. Proponents argue that it enhances efficiency, reduces congestion, and improves safety through better technology. Opponents argue that it is costly, may face technical challenges, and requires significant maintenance and upgrades.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should cities implement congestion pricing to reduce traffic in busy urban areas?

Congestion pricing is a system where drivers are charged a fee to enter certain high-traffic areas during peak times, aiming to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. Proponents argue that it effectively reduces traffic and emissions while generating revenue for public transportation improvements. Opponents argue that it unfairly targets lower-income drivers and may simply shift congestion to other areas.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should funding for local police departments be redirected to social and community based programs?

“Defund the police” is a slogan that supports divesting funds from police departments and reallocating them to non-policing forms of public safety and community support, such as social services, youth services, housing, education, healthcare and other community resources.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government ban the import of the Adler A110 lever-action shotgun?

In August 2015, Prime Minister Tony Abbott reversed a ban on the import of the A110 lever-action shotgun. This reversed a six-month ban of the gun that the government had enacted in July 2015. Gun rights advocates argue that the gun should not be banned since it is not semi-automatic and widely used by law-abiding hunters and farmers. Anti-gun activists of the gun argue that it is too similar to a semi-automatic weapon since a modified version can fire eleven rounds in eleven seconds and lifting the ban could lead to mass shootings.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should police departments be allowed to use military grade equipment?

Militarization of police refers to the use of military equipment and tactics by law enforcement officers. This includes the use of armored vehicles, assault rifles, flashbang grenades, sniper rifles, and SWAT teams. Proponents argue that this equipment increases officers’ safety and enables them to better protect the public and other first responders. Opponents argue that police forces which received military equipment were more likely to have violent encounters with the public.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the penalty for traffic violations depend on the driver’s income?

In some countries, traffic fines are adjusted based on the offender’s income - a system known as "day fines" - to ensure that penalties are equally impactful regardless of wealth. This approach aims to create fairness by making fines proportionate to the driver’s ability to pay, rather than applying the same flat rate to everyone. Proponents argue that income-based fines make penalties more equitable, as flat fines may be insignificant to the wealthy but burdensome to low-income individuals. Opponents argue that penalties should be consistent for all drivers to maintain fairness under the law, and that income-based fines could create resentment or be difficult to enforce.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government implement restorative justice programs as an alternative to incarceration?

Restorative justice programs focus on rehabilitating offenders through reconciliation with victims and the community, rather than through traditional incarceration. These programs often involve dialogue, restitution, and community service. Proponents argue that restorative justice reduces recidivism, heals communities, and provides more meaningful accountability for offenders. Opponents argue that it may not be suitable for all crimes, could be perceived as too lenient, and may not adequately deter future criminal behavior.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should non-violent prisoners be released from jail in order to reduce overcrowding?

Prison overcrowding is a social phenomenon occurring when the demand for space in prisons in a jurisdiction exceeds the capacity for prisoners.The issues associated with prison overcrowding are not new, and have been brewing for many years. During the United States’ War on Drugs, the states were left responsible for solving the prison overcrowding issue with a limited amount of money. Moreover, federal prison populations may increase if states adhere to federal policies, such as mandatory minimum sentences. On the other hand, the Justice Department provides billions of dollars a year for state and local law enforcement to ensure they follow the policies set forth by the federal government concerning U.S. prisons. Prison overcrowding has affected some states more than others, but overall, the risks of overcrowding are substantial and there are solutions to this problem.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should convicted criminals have the right to vote?

Felony disenfranchisement is the exclusion from voting of people otherwise eligible to vote due to conviction of a criminal offense, usually restricted to the more serious class of crimes deemed felonies. People service sentences of five years or more are not allowed to vote while they are in jail. Disenfranchisement does not continue after release from jail/prison. The Commonwealth Franchise Act 1902 denied the franchise to vote to anyone 'attainted of treason, or who had been convicted and is under sentence or subject to be sentenced for any offence, punishable by imprisonment for one year or longer.' In 1995 the act was relaxed to include only people who are serving prison sentences of more than five years.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government create a publicly accessible registry of convicted domestic violence offenders?

Domestic violence is a massive national crisis in Australia, leading to calls for a public database similar to a sex offender registry. Proponents argue that a registry empowers women with life-saving information before entering dangerous relationships, pointing to Clare's Law in the UK as a successful model. Opponents counter that public name and shame lists drive offenders underground, increase the risk of vigilante violence, and completely undermine the goal of rehabilitation by permanently destroying a person's ability to get a job or housing.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should bail laws be tightened to make it harder for youth offenders to get out of jail?

This issue centers on the 'youth crime crisis' narrative currently dominating Australian media. Critics of the current system call it 'catch and release,' arguing that magistrates are too lenient on teenagers who steal cars or break into homes. However, legal experts warn that incarcerating children significantly increases the likelihood of adult offending and that bail reform often targets vulnerable Indigenous youth. Proponents argue that community safety must come first and that consequences for crime must be immediate. Opponents argue that locking up children does not address the root causes of poverty, and simply entrenches them in the criminal justice system.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should police be given the power to enforce night-time curfews on children in high-crime towns?

This issue gained national attention following the imposition of a youth curfew in Alice Springs in response to a surge in break-ins and violence. Supporters argue that when law and order breaks down, the state has a duty of care to physically remove unaccompanied minors from the streets for their own safety and the safety of the public. They view it as a necessary "circuit breaker." Opponents, including human rights groups and Indigenous legal services, argue that curfews are racially discriminatory in practice, breach civil liberties, and historically fail to reduce crime rates, often leading to more hostile confrontations between youth and police.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should sexual assault cases be decided by a judge alone, rather than a jury of peers?

This debate has intensified following high-profile trials where arguably guilty defendants were acquitted or faced mistrials due to jury misconduct or bias. Legal advocates argue that sexual assault cases are uniquely difficult for laypeople to judge objectively because of pervasive societal myths about how a "perfect victim" should behave. Critics argue that removing juries is an authoritarian overreach that places too much power in the hands of a judiciary that lacks diversity. A proponent supports this to increase justice for victims; an opponent opposes this to protect the right to a fair trial.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government hire private companies to run prisons?

Private prisons are incarceration centers that are run by a for-profit company instead of a government agency. The companies that operate private prisons are paid a per-diem or monthly rate for each prisoner they keep in their facilities. In 2018 18.4% of prisoners in Australia were held in private prisons. Opponents of private prisons argue that incarceration is a social responsibility and that entrusting it to for-profit companies is inhumane. Proponents argue that prisons run by private companies are consistently more cost effective than those run by government agencies.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should AI be used to make decisions in criminal justice systems?

This considers the use of AI algorithms to assist in making decisions such as sentencing, parole, and law enforcement. Proponents argue that it can improve efficiency and reduce human biases. Opponents argue that it may perpetuate existing biases and lacks accountability.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should drug traffickers receive the death penalty?

Since 1999, the executions of drug smugglers have become more common in Indonesia, Iran, China and Pakistan. In March 2018, U.S. President Donald Trump proposed executing drug traffickers to fight his country’s opioid epidemic. 32 countries impose the death penalty for drug smuggling. Seven of these countries (China, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Vietnam, Malaysia and Singapore) routinely execute drug offenders. Asia and the Middle East’s tough approach contrasts with many Western countries who have legalized cannabis in recent years (selling cannabis in Saudi Arabia is punished by beheading).

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government implement rent control policies to limit the amount landlords can charge for rent?

Rent control policies are regulations that limit the amount landlords can increase rent, intended to keep housing affordable. Proponents argue that it makes housing more affordable and prevents exploitation by landlords. Opponents argue that it discourages investment in rental properties and reduces the quality and availability of housing.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should homeless individuals, that have refused available shelter or housing, be allowed to sleep or encamp on public property?

Stats Discuss

Should the government incentivize the construction of high density residential buildings?

High density housing refers to housing developments with a higher population density than average. For example, high rise apartments are considered high density, especially in comparison to single-family homes or condominiums. High density real estate can also be developed from empty or abandoned buildings. For instance, old warehouses can be renovated and turned into luxury lofts. Further, commercial buildings that are no longer in use can be refitted into high-rise apartments. Opponents argue that more housing will lower the value of their home (or rental units) and change the “character” of neighborhoods. Proponents argue that the buildings are more environmentally friendly than single family homes will lower housing costs for people who cannot afford large homes.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government provide assistance to homeowners facing foreclosure?

Assistance programs help homeowners who are at risk of losing their homes due to financial difficulties by providing financial support or restructuring loans. Proponents argue that it prevents people from losing their homes and stabilizes communities. Opponents argue that it encourages irresponsible borrowing and is unfair to those who pay their mortgages.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should local councils cap the number of days a property can be rented out on short-term platforms like Airbnb?

The explosion of short-term rental platforms has profoundly changed local real estate markets. Proponents argue that investors hoarding properties for lucrative short-term holiday rentals drastically reduces the long-term rental supply, driving up local housing and rent prices to unlivable extremes. Opponents argue that capping rentals infringes on private property rights, hurts mum-and-dad investors, and damages the tourism sector which relies on decentralized accommodation.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should first-home buyers be allowed to withdraw from their superannuation to buy a house?

Superannuation is Australia's compulsory retirement savings system. With housing affordability at crisis levels, proponents argue buyers should be able to access their own locked-away wealth to secure a home, which is a key asset for retirement. Opponents, including the Super industry, argue that allowing early access undermines the purpose of Super and acts as a demand-side stimulus that will simply increase property prices without adding supply.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government tax homeowners who leave their properties empty?

In the midst of a critical housing shortage, census data often reveals tens of thousands of homes sitting empty across major cities. A vacancy tax aims to incentivize owners to rent these properties out or sell them, rather than 'land banking' for capital gains. Critics argue that many homes are empty for valid reasons, such as renovations, deceased estates, or owners working temporarily overseas, and that such a tax is an infringement on private property rights. Proponents argue that during a crisis, hoarding shelter as a tax-free speculative asset is immoral and must be penalized to increase supply.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the federal government override local council zoning laws to force the construction of high-density housing?

In Australia, local councils dictate zoning, which frequently leads to NIMBY opposition blocking high-density developments. Proponents argue overriding these councils is the only way to build enough homes to crash inflated property prices and solve the housing crisis. Opponents argue stripping local planning control destroys neighborhood character, overburdens local infrastructure, and enriches developers without guaranteeing affordable housing.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government provide subsidies for first-time homebuyers?

These subsidies are financial aids from the government to help individuals purchase their first home, making homeownership more accessible. Proponents argue that it helps people afford their first home and promotes homeownership. Opponents argue that it distorts the housing market and could lead to higher prices.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government restrict the purchase of residential properties by foreign investors?

Restrictions would limit the ability of non-citizens to buy homes, aiming to keep housing prices affordable for local residents. Proponents argue that it helps maintain affordable housing for locals and prevents property speculation. Opponents argue that it deters foreign investment and can negatively impact the housing market.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government incentivize the construction of affordable housing?

Incentives could include financial support or tax breaks for developers to build housing that is affordable for low- and middle-income families. Proponents argue that it increases the supply of affordable housing and addresses housing shortages. Opponents argue that it interferes with the housing market and can be costly for taxpayers.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should new housing developments be required to include green spaces and parks?

Green spaces in housing developments are areas designated for parks and natural landscapes to enhance residents' quality of life and environmental health. Proponents argue that it enhances community well-being and environmental quality. Opponents argue that it increases the cost of housing and developers should decide the layout of their projects.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government increase funding for homeless shelters and services?

Increased funding would enhance the capacity and quality of shelters and services that provide support for homeless individuals. Proponents argue that it provides essential support for the homeless and helps reduce homelessness. Opponents argue that it is costly and may not address the root causes of homelessness.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government require children to be vaccinated for preventable diseases?

In 2015 Prime Minister Tony Abbott announced that parents would no longer receive welfare payments if their children were not vaccinated. People who object to vaccines for religious purposes can continue to receive payments if they are affiliated with a religious group whose governing body has a formally registered objection recognised by the federal government. 97% of children in Australia are vaccinated.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support the use of nuclear energy?

Nuclear power is the use of nuclear reactions that release energy to generate heat, which most frequently is then used in steam turbines to produce electricity in a nuclear power station. Australia currently has no nuclear facilities generating electricity. Australia's extensive, low-cost coal and natural gas reserves have historically been used as strong arguments for avoiding nuclear power. Proponents argue that nuclear energy is now safe and emits much less carbon emissions than coal plants. Opponents argue that recent nuclear disasters in Japan prove that nuclear power is far from safe.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government allow the commercialization of lab-grown meat?

Lab-grown meat is produced by culturing animal cells and could serve as an alternative to traditional livestock farming. Proponents argue that it can reduce environmental impact and animal suffering, and improve food security. Opponents argue that it may face public resistance and unknown long-term health effects.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government fund research into genetic engineering for disease prevention and treatment?

Genetic engineering involves modifying the DNA of organisms to prevent or treat diseases. Proponents argue that it could lead to breakthroughs in curing genetic disorders and improving public health. Opponents argue that it raises ethical concerns and potential risks of unintended consequences.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government regulate the use of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications?

CRISPR is a powerful tool for editing genomes, allowing for precise modifications to DNA that allows scientists to better understand gene functions, model diseases more accurately, and develop innovative treatments. Proponents argue that regulation ensures safe and ethical use of the technology. Opponents argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and scientific progress.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should immigrants be deported if they commit a serious crime?

In 2015 the U.S. House of Representatives introduced the Establishing Mandatory Minimums for Illegal Reentry Act of 2015 (Kate’s Law.) The law was introduced after San Francisco 32 year old San Francisco resident Kathryn Steinle was shot and killed by Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez on July 1, 2015. Lopez-Sanchez was an illegal immigrant from Mexico who had been deported on five separate occasions since 1991 and been charged with seven felony convictions. Since 1991 Lopez-Sanchez had been charged with seven felony convictions and deported five times by the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service. Although Lopez-Sanchez had several outstanding warrants in 2015 authorities were unable to deport him due to San Francisco’s sanctuary city policy which prevents law enforcement officials from questioning a resident’s immigration status. Proponents of sanctuary city laws argue that they enable illegal immigrants to report crimes without the fear of being reported. Opponents argue that sanctuary city laws provide encourage illegal immigration and prevent law enforcement authorities from detaining and deporting criminals.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should Australia accept asylum-seeking boat immigrants?

Currently, asylum seekers who arrive in Australia by boat are denied immigration status. If they are genuine refugees they are resettled in Papua New Guinea and if they are not genuine refugees they are sent back to their originating country or a safe third country other than Australia. This issue is currently the highest ranked "most important" issue of the election.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="http://www.immi.gov.au/visas/humanitarian/novisa/regional-arrangements.pdf">Learn&nbsp;more</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;or

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should immigrants from high risk countries be banned from entering the country until the government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists?

Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should Australia increase or decrease the amount of temporary work visas given to high-skilled immigrant workers?

Skilled temporary work visas are usually given to foreign scientists, engineers, programmers, architects, executives, and other positions or fields where demand outpaces supply. Most businesses argue that hiring skilled foreign workers allows them to competitively fill positions which are in high demand. In 2016 the Migration Council announced a proposal where students trained at US and UK universities and colleges could apply for work visas in Australia. The students are allowed to stay up to four years on temporary visas and then apply for permanent citizenship. The Migration Council estimates this will add 1.6 trillion to the country’s gross domestic product through 2050. Opponents argue that skilled immigrants decrease middle class wages and job tenure.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should immigrants to Australia be allowed to hold dual citizenship status?

Multiple citizenship, also called dual citizenship is a person's citizenship status, in which a person is concurrently regarded as a citizen of more than one state under the laws of those states. There is no international convention which determines the nationality or citizen status of a person, which is defined exclusively by national laws, which vary and can be inconsistent with each other. Some countries do not permit dual citizenship. Most countries that permit dual citizenship still may not recognize the other citizenship of its nationals within its own territory, for example, in relation to entry into the country, national service, duty to vote, etc.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government have the power to indefinitely detain non-citizens who have completed criminal sentences but cannot be deported?

Following the landmark High Court NZYQ ruling that found indefinite immigration detention unlawful, the Australian government scrambled to pass emergency preventive detention laws. Proponents argue that releasing violent offenders into the community poses an unacceptable risk to public safety. Opponents argue that punishing individuals beyond their court-mandated sentences violates fundamental human rights and the separation of powers.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government drastically reduce the annual intake of immigrants to ease the housing crisis?

Australia has recently experienced record levels of Net Overseas Migration (NOM), sparking an intense debate about the country's capacity to house and service a rapidly growing population. Proponents of a cap argue that the intake has drastically outpaced the construction of new homes, driving rents and property prices to unsustainable highs while clogging infrastructure. Opponents argue that blaming immigrants is a distraction from policy failures in housing supply and tax settings, and warn that slashing numbers would hurt the economy, worsen inflation, and leave critical industries like aged care without workers.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should immigrants be required to pass a citizenship test to demonstrate a basic understanding of our country’s language, history, and government?

Since 2007, anyone applying for Australian citizenship has had to take a test on their new country's history, politics, and values. The 45 minutes test is only given in English and contains 20 multiple choice questions which are drawn randomly from a pool of 200 confidential questions. The material is drawn from the official guide "Our common bond" published by the Australian Government department of Immigration and Citizenship.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should immigrants be expected to learn the official language of their new country?

Stats Discuss

Should Australia increase or decrease foreign aid spending?

In 2014 the Australian government cut the Foreign Aid Budget to $4 billion. This represented a 29% cut of the previous year’s budget of $5.6 billion. According to the treasury the funds would be redirected to Defence and national security. Proponents of aid cuts say the funds are better used for domestic programs and anti-terror efforts on behalf of the military. Opponents of the cuts argue that the current reduction is too drastic and Australia should match the higher aid spending of other developed countries like the UK.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should Australia increase or decrease military spending?

In February 2016 the government announced that military spending will increase Military spending will grow by $29.9b through 2026. Australia’s military budget is the 12th largest in the world. The 2016 increase will rank Australia 9th amongst world Defence budgets as a percentage of GDP. Proponents of a larger budget argue that it is necessary due to recent disagreements between the US and China in the South China sea. Critics of a larger budget argue that it sets off an unnecessary arms race and will provoke China into creating a larger naval force to offset it.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should Australia allow the U.S. to operate military bases located in Australia.

In 1970 the US military opened the Pine Gap satellite tracking facility in Alice Springs. The facility employs 800 people and is used to control US spy satellites over the Pacific region. In 2013 Edward Snowden revealed documents which showed Pine Gap being used in the controversial PRISM surveillance program. The program collects personal data from major internet companies.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should Australia provide military supplies and funding to Ukraine?

On February 24 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine in a major escalation of the Russo-Ukrainian War that began in 2014. The invasion caused Europe's largest refugee crisis since World War II, with around 7.1 million Ukrainians fleeing the country and a third of the population displaced. It has also caused global food shortages.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

The two-state solution is a proposed diplomatic solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The proposal envisions an independent State of Palestine that borders Israel. Palestinian leadership has supported the concept since the 1982 Arab Summit in Fez. In 2017 the Hamas (a Palestinian Resistance movement that controls the Gaza strip) accepted the solution without recognizing Israel as a state. The current Israeli leadership has stated that a two-state solution can only exist without Hamas and the current Palestinian leadership. The U.S. would have to take a central role in any talks between the Israelis and Palestinians. That has not happened since the Obama administration, when the secretary of state at the time, John Kerry, shuttled between the two sides in 2013 and 2014 before giving up in frustration. Under President Donald J. Trump, the United States shifted its energy from resolving the Palestinian issue to normalizing relations between Israel and its Arab neighbors. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has swung between saying he would be willing to consider a Palestinian nation with limited security powers, and opposing it outright. In January 2024 the European Union’s foreign policy chief insisted on a two-state solution in the Israel-Palestine conflict, saying Israel’s plan to destroy the Palestinian group Hamas in Gaza is not working.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should Ukraine join NATO?

Stats Discuss

Should Australia take an aggressive stance against Japanese whalers?

Japan's current whaling program involves killing up to 1035 whales in the Southern Ocean each year for "science".

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should Australia back the Egyptian military's crackdown against the muslim brotherhood?

In June 2012 Egypt democratically elected its first head of state, Mohammed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood. Morsi's term as President lasted less than one year before he was ousted by the Egyptian military in the spring of 2013. Morsi's supporters have since rebelled against the military sending the country into a state of of near civil war.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the military use weapons guided by artificial intelligence?

Artificial intelligence (AI) makes it possible for machines to learn from experience, adjust to new inputs and perform human-like tasks. Lethal autonomous weapons systems use artificial intelligence to identify and kill human targets without human intervention. Russia, the United States and China have all recently invested billions of dollars secretly developing AI weapons systems sparking fears of an eventual “AI Cold War.”In April 2024 +972 Magazine published a report detailing the Israeli Defense Forces intelligence-based program known as “Lavender.” Israeli intelligence sources told the magazine that Lavender played a central role in the bombing of Palestinians during the Gaza War. The system was designed to mark all suspected Palestinian military operatives as potential bombing targets. The Israeli army systematically attacked the targeted individuals while they were in their homes — usually at night while their whole families were present — rather than during the course of military activity. The result, as the sources testified, is that thousands of Palestinians — most of them women and children or people who were not involved in the fighting — were wiped out by Israeli airstrikes, especially during the first weeks of the war, because of the AI program’s decisions.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement?

In December 2015 the Australian and Chinese governments agreed to a bilateral Free Trade agreement. The agreement made 95% of all Australian exports into China tariff-free including agricultural products such as beef and dairy. Opponents of the deal included Unions who argued that it posed the risk of shipping jobs to China since it did not contain any labour market testing requirements. Proponents argue that the deal will grow the economy by giving exporters greater access to the expanding Chinese economy.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government officially recognize Palestine as a sovereign state?

This question addresses whether Australia should unilaterally recognize Palestine before a final peace deal is reached. The current Labor government has signaled openness to recognition to build momentum for a two-state solution, aligning with nations like Spain and Norway. The Coalition opposes this, arguing recognition without a finalized deal rewards Hamas tactics. Proponents view it as a moral necessity; opponents argue it undermines Israel's security negotiation leverage.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should Australia acquire nuclear-powered submarines through the AUKUS security pact?

The AUKUS agreement involves the US and UK sharing nuclear propulsion technology with Australia to build a new fleet of submarines. Supporters argue this is the only way to counter China's naval expansion. Critics warn that the massive cost drains funds from social programs and that the reliance on US technology effectively removes Australia's ability to say "no" to future American military conflicts.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should citizens lose their citizenship if they join a terrorist organization in a foreign country?

In 2016 the government expanded section 35 of the Citizenship Act to revoke the citizenship of any Australian who joins a foreign terrorist group. The measure includes Australians with single and dual citizenship and was proposed after several Australian nationals joined ISIS in the Middle East. The previous law revokes citizenship if Australians take up arms with the militaries of ‘enemy states’ but does not cover foreign terrorist organziations. Opponents include human rights groups and constitutional lawyers who argue that the law allows foreign governments to accuse people of terrorism for minor acts including graffiti and sit in protests. Proponents argue that the law is necessary to prevent terrorists re-entering the country.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should Australia maintain a presence at the United Nations?

The UN. is an organization of governments founded in 1945 after World War II. The organization's objectives include promoting peace and security, protecting human rights and the environment and providing humanitarian aid in cases of famine, natural disaster, and armed conflict. Recent U.N. interventions include the Sri Lankan civil war in 2009 and the 2010 earthquake in Haiti. Australia joined the U.N. in 1945 as a founding member nation. Australia is the twelfth largest financial contributor to the UN and contributes $30 million annually.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government attempt to influence foreign elections?

Foreign electoral interventions are attempts by governments, covertly or overtly, to influence elections in another country. A 2016 study by Dov H. Levin concluded that the country intervening in most foreign elections was the United States with 81 interventions, followed by Russia (including the former Soviet Union) with 36 interventions from 1946 to 2000. In July 2018 U.S. Representative Ro Khanna introduced an amendment that would have prevented U.S. intelligence agencies from receiving funding that could be used to interfere in the elections of foreign governments. The amendment would ban U.S. agencies from “hacking foreign political parties; engaging in the hacking or manipulation of foreign electoral systems; or sponsoring or promoting media outside the United States that favors one candidate or party over another.” Proponents of election interference helps keep hostile leaders and political parties out of power. Opponents argue that the amendment would send a message to other foreign countries that the U.S. does not interfere in election and set a global gold standard for preventing election interference. Opponents argue that election interference helps keep hostile leaders and political parties out of power.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should there be restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations?

The United Nations defines human rights violations as deprivation of life; torture, cruel or degrading treatment or punishment; slavery and forced labor; arbitrary arrest or detention; arbitrary interference with privacy; war propaganda; discrimination; and advocacy of racial or religious hatred. In 1997 the U.S. Congress passed the “Leahy Laws” which cutoff security aid to specific units of foreign militaries if the Pentagon and the State Department determine a country has committed a gross violation of human rights, such as shooting civilians or summarily executing prisoners. Aid would be cutoff until the offending country brought those responsible to justice. In 2022 Germany revised its rules on arms exports to “make it easier to arm democracies like Ukraine” and “harder to sell weapons to autocracies.” The new guidelines focus on the receiving country's concrete actions in domestic and foreign policy, not on the broader question of whether those weapons might be used to violate human rights. Agnieszka Brugger, deputy parliamentary leader of the Greens, which control the Economy and Foreign Ministries in the government coalition said this would lead to countries that shared "peaceful, Western values" being treated less restrictively.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should Australia conduct military strikes against North Korea in order to destroy their long-range missile and nuclear weapons capabilities?

In 2016 the North Korean government reported that it had conducted a ground test of a new rocket engine intended to power the first stage of an intercontinental ballistic missile. The Turnbull government condemned the test a threat to "peace and security … in our region and beyond." Opponents of airstrikes argue that the tests are false flags and that the Chinese will prevent the North Korean government from carrying out airstrikes. Proponents of airstrikes argue that North Korea must be stopped before it has the chance to launch a nuclear missile outside into another continent.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should every 18 year old citizen be required to provide at least one year of military service?

Military Service is currently not required in the Australia. The last conflicted requiring National Service was the Vietnam War in the 1960s and 70s.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the daily recital of the Lord's Prayer at the opening of federal parliament be abolished?

Since 1901, both houses of the Australian federal parliament have opened their daily proceedings with the Lord's Prayer. Proponents of keeping it argue that it reflects the nation's institutional heritage and provides a solemn, unifying grounding for lawmakers. Opponents argue that it is an exclusionary relic of the past that alienates non-Christian Australians and violates the secular nature of modern government.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government mandate that large tech companies share their algorithms with regulators?

Algorithms used by tech companies, such as those that recommend content or filter information, are often proprietary and closely guarded secrets. Proponents argue that transparency would prevent abuses and ensure fair practices. Opponents argue that it would harm business confidentiality and competitive advantage.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government implement stricter regulations on the use of cryptocurrencies?

Crypto technology offers tools like payment, lending, borrowing, and saving to anyone with an internet connection. Proponents argue that stricter regulations would deter criminal use. Opponents argue that stricter crypto regulation would limit financial opportunities to citizens that are denied access to or can't afford the fees associated with traditional banking.  Watch video

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should artists be held to the same reporting and disclosure requirements as hedge funds, mutual funds, and public companies when selling their artwork?

In 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought lawsuits against artists and art marketplaces, arguing that artwork should be classified as a security and subject to the same reporting and disclosure standards as financial institutions. Proponents argue that this would provide greater transparency and protect buyers from fraud, ensuring that the art market operates with the same accountability as financial markets. Opponents contend that such regulations are overly burdensome and would stifle creativity, making it nearly impossible for artists to sell their work without facing complex legal hurdles.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should manufacturers be legally required to provide spare parts and repair manuals to the public?

The "Right to Repair" movement calls for legislation requiring manufacturers to make spare parts, diagnostic tools, and repair manuals available to consumers and independent repair shops. Currently, many tech and automotive companies restrict repairs to authorized networks, citing safety and intellectual property concerns. Proponents argue that these restrictions create artificial monopolies, increase costs for consumers, and generate massive amounts of avoidable e-waste by encouraging replacement over repair. Opponents argue that allowing unregulated repairs compromises device security, exposes trade secrets, and risks user safety through improper handling of sensitive components like lithium-ion batteries.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government raise the age of eligibility for the age pension to 70?

Australia's aging population presents a massive fiscal challenge, prompting debates about increasing the age pension eligibility to 70. This would theoretically keep people in the workforce longer, increasing tax revenues and reducing welfare expenditures. Proponents support this as a necessary mathematical reality to prevent national bankruptcy as the ratio of active workers to retirees shrinks. Opponents oppose this as a cruel breach of the social contract that forces the working class to labor until they die while the wealthy retire early.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government impose stricter regulations on the collection and use of personal data by companies?

Companies often collect personal data from users for various purposes, including advertising and improving services. Proponents argue that stricter regulations would protect consumer privacy and prevent data misuse. Opponents argue that it would burden businesses and hinder technological innovation.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government regulate artificial intelligence (AI) to ensure ethical use?

Regulating AI involves setting guidelines and standards to ensure AI systems are used ethically and safely. Proponents argue that it prevents misuse, protects privacy, and ensures AI benefits society. Opponents argue that excessive regulation could hinder innovation and technological advancement.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should citizens be allowed to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets that the government can monitor but not control?

Self-hosted digital wallets are personal, user-managed storage solutions for digital currencies like Bitcoin, which provide individuals with control over their funds without relying on third-party institutions. Monitoring refers to the government having the capability to oversee transactions without the ability to directly control or interfere with the funds. Proponents argue that it ensures personal financial freedom and security while allowing the government to monitor for illegal activities such as money laundering and terrorism financing. Opponents argue that even monitoring infringes on privacy rights and that self-hosted wallets should remain completely private and free from government oversight.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should Australia end the monarchy and become a republic?

Australia is a constitutional monarchy, with Britain's Queen Elizabeth as head of state. The role is largely ceremonial, but the monarch does have the power to dissolve parliament, as in 1975, when Queen Elizabeth sacked the government. In 1999 a referendum to end the monarchy was defeated by voters 55%-45%.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government be able to monitor phone calls and emails?

In 2014 the Australian government passed the National Security Amendment bill which granted new surveillance powers to Australia's spy agency, ASIO. Under the legislation, which passed the lower house with support from the main opposition Labor Party, anyone disclosing information about "special intelligence operations" could face a decade in prison.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Are you in favour of decriminalising drug use?

Recreational use of illicit drugs including marijuana, cocaine and heroin is currently illegal in Australia. In 1985, the federal and state governments adopted a National Drug Strategy which included a pragmatic mixture of prohibition and a stated objective of harm reduction. Between 1998 and 2007 overall illicit drug use declined close to 40%. Amphetamines use declined by 38%; cannabis use fell by close to 50%; and use of heroin dropped by an impressive 75%. In February 2016 parliament amended the Narcotics Drugs Act, and created a national licensing scheme for the controlled cultivation and testing of medical cannabis.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should political parties be required to run a certain percentage of women candidates?

Candidate quotas is a system in which political parties are penalised for not running a certain percentage of women candidates for office. In 2012 legislation was introduced which would have required parties to field at least 30% women candidates at the next election and 40% at the election after that. If a party failed to meet these thresholds they would lose half of their public funding. Women currently make up 24.7% of the lower house and 38.2% in the upper house. Of 189 developed countries Australia currently ranks 46 out of 189. Proponents of quotas argue that they help promote gender diversity in government and are responsible for a 20% increase in the proportion of women in parliaments worldwide.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the constitution recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people?

The Australian constitution does not currently reference Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. The federal government created a council to explore holding a referendum on the subject in May 2017. Proponents, including Prime Minister Turnbull, argue that the original inhabitants of Australia should be recognized in the constitution and all racial elements should be removed. Opponents argue that the government resources should not be wasted on holding a referendum.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government regulate social media sites, as a means to prevent fake news and misinformation?

In January 2018 Germany passed the NetzDG law which required platforms like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to take down perceived illegal content within 24 hours or seven days, depending on the charge, or risk a fine of €50 million ($60 million) fines. In July 2018 representatives from Facebook, Google and Twitter denied to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary committee that they censor content for political reasons. During the hearing Republican members of Congress criticized the social media companies for politically motivated practices in removing some content, a charge the companies rejected. In April 2018 the European Union issued a series of proposals that would crack down on “online misinformation and fake news.” In June 2018 President Emmanuel Macron of France proposed a law which would give French authorities the power to immediately halt “the publication of information deemed to be false ahead of elections.”

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should it be illegal to burn the Australian flag?

Flag desecration is any act that is carried out with the intention of damaging or destroying a national flag in public. This is commonly done in an effort to make a political statement against a nation or its policies. Some nations have acts that ban flag desecration while others have laws that protect the right to destroy a flag as a part of free speech. Some of these laws distinguish between a national flag and those of other countries.

Learn more Stats Discuss