The Australian constitution does not currently reference Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. The federal government created a council to explore holding a referendum on the subject in May 2017. Proponents, including Prime Minister Turnbull, argue that the original inhabitants of Australia should be recognized in the constitution and all racial elements should be removed. Opponents argue that the government resources should not be wasted on holding a referendum.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Political party:
Federal Electorate:
Local Government Area:
Postcode:
@593R4MJ4yrs4Y
To be honest, Im sick of recognizing Aboriginal people. this country is going to end up being run by Aboriginals soon and the white man will be a second class citizen. Hell we can't even claim racism when an Aboriginal calls us whiteys or crackers or honky or any racial slur.
@8F6MYPM5yrs5Y
It should mention all people
@4X989LW4yrs4Y
They should recognise all religions and cultures but provide no benefit for any as we are all Australian.
@9727M252yrs2Y
No. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are Australian and therefore they are already recognised. By creating a specific reference, category or any other separation/segregation from being 'Australian' is a form of apartheid.
No, Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders are Australian, thus I would argue they are recognized and represented, even if not by name. The constitution doesn't need to change.
It's important, but a referendum is incredibly expensive to hold. It would be more efficient to actually do something that would provide resources that would actually help someone, and serve more of a purpose than just sit there as a token gesture.
@B3HK8FB2mos2MO
yes, but it should only create an environment for them to feel safe from racism and other prejudice, rather than leveraging them into positions of power that already have representation
@B4L7FMZ2wks2W
If they are being written to be formally recognised then yes. If you are giving them power to overturn or impact laws via the voice based on outdated and prejudicial treatment from generations ago, then no.
@B4JJCRG2wks2W
Our constitution is a joke not fit to wipe your *** with regardless of who it does or doesn't include.
@B4GK74Y3wks3W
No, not in the way they want. They are only a small percentage of the population, and should be treated as a minority like other similar sized groups.
@B4GK74Y3wks3W
Yes they should be recognised, but only as the 2% of the population that they are. They are not a large percentage of the population, so they shouldn't be over-represented like they currently are.
@B4BSXQ43wks3W
Yes, but only if it recognizes the ability for indigenous people to gain autonomy separate from the colony with their own means of self-governance.
They are part of Australia and are Australians, and the constitution is for all Australians which includes them. So there's no need to start subdividing groups based on race since the constitution already applies to all.
@B48ZGN84wks4W
As long as what ever is written into the constitution is only an advisory body and whatever is recommended doesn't need to be followed, this does not really affect me. Doesn't bother me if we have it or not in this scenario.
@B3ZPLVK1mo1MO
Its should state that anyone who is an Australian no matter their race, is expected to be treated as any Australian would
@B3WWHTH1mo1MO
Recognised as what? australia, as a united, diverse, democratic, and stable nation, was created by by settlers. we have made ammends with the first nations people, and now the lyrics of the song a true "i am, you are, we're all australian"
@B3VMCWX1mo1MO
No, this is a trick question. Constitutional rights are given to everyone, all people including aboriginal and Torres Strait islander people are recognised
@B3QG99Y2mos2MO
No; the constitution is a set of laws and ideals that should affect all citizens equally. No one demographic should be singled out for special treatment. Doing so only increases the potential for discriminatory behaviour, not the reverse. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders deserve their history and contributions acknowledged, and the abuses done to them addressed in meaningful and compensatory ways, but not indefinitely, and not written into the very fabric of society.
@B25CCVB4mos4MO
It already recognises them. Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders are Australians. And the Australian constitution is for Australians.
We should encourage unity in our language. We are all Australians as far as the National Government is concerned
@9WNBX8Z6mos6MO
It already does it Says that the constitution is for all Australians, including indigenous ones already
@9W7FMBV6mos6MO
Yes, but only those who consider themselves federation Australian citizens, people who only see themselves as Aboriginal should just be that.
@9VYHRZ56mos6MO
No, the government should not specially recognise any racial group, as everyone should be seen as equal before the law and the constitution.
@9VYFGNV6mos6MO
Should a non corrupt body be placed in parliament that can not be abolished that has equal powers as any party or politician and enable evolution of democracy.
The constitution already recognises all people as it is guided and underpinned by equality of citizenship
@9TQ6P2F7mos7MO
Yes, but I’d prefer to do something which would actually help marginalised people like indigenous Australians
@9TKSK4D7mos7MO
Yes but more broadly to ensure all Australians regardless of background. Which I believe is already in the constitution.
Yes, but I would prefer to do something to actually help indigenous Australians, rather than spending a lot on a referendum
@9GD5S5L2yrs2Y
I believe recognition is important via opportunities and funding. the constitution will does not effect recognition for any individual. its on the basis of a whole nation.
@9G9KR952yrs2Y
yes but recognise them as Australian's, don't divide Aboriginals and Torres strait islander people from white Australians, make us all equal.
how are they represented in it? i believe that it shouldnt give them advantages over everyone else. everyone should be treated the same.
@9FFS62Y2yrs2Y
yes but they should be treated equally if they commit a crime
@9FBCTNW2yrs2Y
what they mean by recognise
@B35DK7G2mos2MO
The constitution seems to be mostly overridden in any case the politicians will just do as they please. By adding the aboriginal people into the constitution it means that they can be further exploited than certainly not. Sorry, not sorry right?
@B2ZHWGD2mos2MO
The constitution should recognise ATSI rights to local autonomy as part of a Treaty, however it should not provide centralised power on the basis of forced diversity.
If they contribute to society and stop making colonization a generational problem. Then “Yes” it’s not about history iota about the future for the country.
@B2S6WLP3mos3MO
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people should have the same opportunities as any other race does.
@B2J5P8H3mos3MO
No, refer to everyone as australian, if they do not see themselves as australian in australia.. they need to leave regardless of ethnicity
@B2HKC4Z3mos3MO
Absolutely not. Australian citizens should be recognised equally no matter their ethnicity. Creating a distinction in the constitution enshrines racism in the country's core document and ensures racism as Australia's future
@B2FTPK3 3mos3MO
Yes, but only if the abilities granted by their constitutional recognition are made clear and voted on.
@B2DVYCF3mos3MO
It's contradictory to want to 'remove all racial elements' and want to recognise a racial group. Race doesn't belong in the constitution.
@9QZKYGX9mos9MO
As long as Australia categorises Aboriginals and Torres Straight Islanders as "another kind", I feel it's wrong. We're all citizens from this land or legally migrated otherwise
@9QRFMPC10mos10MO
Worded only in a way that brings all Australians together instead of dividing aboriginal people further
@9MNDJZK11mos11MO
No because we need to treat them as equals to the rest of us, not higher than us or more privileged but not lower than us and treated like they are a different creature.
A new document should be created to stand alongside the constitution to correctly reflect modern Australia and our next chapter as a nation moving forward. This document should recognise First Nations.
@9MB47WJ12mos12MO
The constitution need to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Islander people as original custodians of the land and acknowledge they need help bridging the gap, but this needs to be done fairly not expending the rights of other Australian citizens
Yes, but they should be treated the same way as other people in terms of criminality. They shouldn't be let off easier for the things they do to Australian citizens.
"Yes, but we shouldn't let them take control. It would be very easy for them to go up to a house or business they want and claim that it's their land, leaving the owners with nothing. We may have treated them poorly in the past, but we have made every effort to apologize. However, they continue to engage in drug use and other negative activities, which only serves to perpetuate a bad reputation and promote racism."
@9M4QCVC12mos12MO
Recognise but don’t segregate. All people deserve the same rights. No law should be added based on race
They should have the same level of citizenship of any other Australian citizen but should not have a voice in parliament restricted to indigenous people.
@9KVQR7Q1yr1Y
Yes, but in a manner that recognises first nations people without incorporating race-based rights into our constitution.
Aboriginal and Torres trait Island peoples should be equal in the community. They should practice their culture and be respected but more diversity between in the community isn't needed.
there are many things to consider however, it should not matter the race of who is in the constitution but rather the qualifications.
IF that is most necessary. Even though the land originally is owned by them. WE as Australians have considered this country to be an open diversity all culture so it is only fair everyone is put or no one is put in the constitution.
The constitution should recognize the harm done to these communities, but not place an overly large emphasis on said communities as to no ostracize them from the other denizens of the country.
Recognised of sites that are holy to them etc. not give them influential voices that could damage national progress due to race.
@9GL9J27 1yr1Y
the aboriginals should be recognised but not given special treatment as it was their ancestors not them
@God's-girl 1yr1Y
Depending on what for if it is just letting them into government then no not at all but if it is to prob people to learn Australia's history from them ten yes
@9DT99G52yrs2Y
@9DNJPSJ2yrs2Y
I am still yet to understand how the Voice Benefits indigineous people - It seems to me that its just adding another bloated bureacracy and will do nothing to help those people that need help - it seems very City Centric and ignores those in the bush
we shouldn't separate people by race and colour just be one species
@9D7SSHM2yrs2Y
NO, they already have as much if not more of a voice as i do
They should only be treated as citizens, not classified as other.
Yes but not specifically. I want a constitution that recognises human beings, not race or ethnicity.
@92LYFCK3yrs3Y
No because they are foreigners and therefore second class citizens.
@927T2ZZ3yrs3Y
No, the constitution should only recognise "Australians" and make no mention of belonging in Australia as an aspect of race, religious belief etc
@9BNPBKV2yrs2Y
Yes, but we should have a constitution that recognises people as human's not by their race or ethnicity.
@99Z6WPS2yrs2Y
Yes, but not specifically
@96PPD8C3yrs3Y
with consultation with aboriginal and Torres Strait islander people
@96FVK5J3yrs3Y
They are citizens of Australia, but should have no special privileges
All people residing in Australia should be recognised in the constitution.
@967ZZPY3yrs3Y
colour and race should be irrelevant. It should really depend on the person themselves. Which includes many factors.
@967Y6ZG3yrs3Y
yes, but it should be limited
@96753DH3yrs3Y
Yes, but hold no referendum.
@95VKDBL3yrs3Y
No, they are already recognised as Australian citizens.
@95LFXG93yrs3Y
Everyone should be treated equally
@95DLCMG3yrs3Y
they should but they shouldn't be given extra privileges
@95DL47J3yrs3Y
They should be recognised equally
Yes Absolutely they are the owners of our land
@94CWB6Z3yrs3Y
No, because it sets them apart from every other Australian and will allow governments to treat them differently.
It recognises "Australians", which is everyone living in Australia, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. So they are not discriminated or excluded anyway.
@93Y3BRYOne Nation3yrs3Y
It’s time to recognise the person, regardless of race, age or gender.
@93FPNVW3yrs3Y
No they are people just like everyone else. They don't deserve special treatment just because there indigenous.
@9366QNH3yrs3Y
@9366BTW3yrs3Y
yes should acknowledge them but how right affect them too.
@933DL863yrs3Y
We ought to establish treaties and recognition for first nations peoples
@93372373yrs3Y
Our constitution already includes them
@9336Y783yrs3Y
Treaded the same as everyone else
Two part answer. Aboriginal and Torres Straight islanders should have all the same rights and obligations as all Australians. Hence, we should be under the one banner as all Australians..
@92Z9R5Q3yrs3Y
No we are one country and should not be segregated
@92YPBN93yrs3Y
Aboriginal and Torres Strait islanders should be treated as fully fledged Austrslians and offerded all the same rights and freedoms. As Australians there should be no need for forms to contain Heritage questions such as 'are you Aboriginal or Torres Straight Islander, nor should there be a need to indicate this.
Yes as long as they contribute to the economy
@92Y7SHG3yrs3Y
They already get recognised enough.
@92XRHRD3yrs3Y
No race should be referenced in the constitution
@92XCTB43yrs3Y
Yes but we shouldn’t have to pay for them to live as it was not our fault for what happened in the past
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.