Incentives could include financial support or tax breaks for developers to build housing that is affordable for low- and middle-income families. Proponents argue that it increases the supply of affordable housing and addresses housing shortages. Opponents argue that it interferes with the housing market and can be costly for taxpayers.
@9PDPBQY10mos10MO
Yes, as long as it does not interfere with the housing market, and is not costly for taxpayers.
@B4BQ9TL2wks2W
Yes, but ensure the developers are making housing that whoever lives in it can keep cost low. for example, no drafts, solar, heavily insulated and control venting for the climates they are made it.
Yes, but affordable housing needs to actually be affordable. 10-20% less than market rent is not enough to help the housing crisis.
@B3GQLSG1mo1MO
The government should build more public housing, that is high density and affordable. it will create jobs and slow the rising of housing prices
@B3G9BMS1mo1MO
Yes, but introduce a bar of quality that developers must reach. So that new housing is also livable and well made housing that will last for decades
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
What would you personally sacrifice (if anything) to make your housing less expensive but more in line with your income?
@9TKSTH87mos7MO
I would pay more taxes for programs which assist in housing affordability.
@B33879H2mos2MO
Yes, as long as the funds are diverted from already existing taxpayer-funded programs so there's no tax increase
@B2YKDVR2mos2MO
No, there should be limits on investment properties and more regulations on rental properties to ensure the housing that already exists can be utilised
@B2QFZL62mos2MO
No, the government should be building government owned housing for low income households, to compete with the private market
@9ZM933G5mos5MO
The government should be building affordable housing. What is this incentivize the construction of?
Are you saying you no longer build public housing and the reason we are facing this mess is because government didnt incentivize enough builders/companies to take up the plight for building public housing? Thats exactly what this question seems to suggest when also paired up with the state of our country right now.
@9QS3S9L9mos9MO
Yes, but fund it through other ways rather than income tax alone.
@9PSLVTY10mos10MO
Yes, as long as it is not costly for taxpayers, and if it does not interfere with the housing market.
Money is better spent on encouraging people to work, to able to afford their own housing. Also, property and rent prices should be decreased.
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@B4KZYZR3 days3D
Yes, in areas marked for development and population growth (regional / rural) and where there are sufficient employment opportunities
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.