Should the government fund the World Health Organization?

No close them down

Yes but also fund national and local programs.

Yes, but the World Health Organisation needs suitable accountability

No, it has been shown to be controlled by Chinese interests

No, the WHO has shown itself to be a criminal organisation.

Yes, but due to the corruption going on in the WHO relating to China and Taiwan, it should be decreased.

Yes, but they need to be have a regulatory power to achieve anything.

Abolish who

No abolish the who

Yes, in theory but national and local healthcare needs funding more.

No, Australia should have no involvement with the United Nations.

To maintain good worldly relations I believe a portion of our funding should help poorer countries in an emergency crisis but our main focus is to clean up our own back yards first.

WTO should be closed

Only if it's Critical

No, Start an Australian version of CDC.

No, the WHO has shown itself to be a criminal organization

No but I don’t think this is as simple as it sounds. They have no legal responsibilities or requirements to treat incidents in each country equally. For example with Covid, because China is a large investor, it became a conflict of interest to curb the Chinese economy by containing the virus.

Depends on its effectiveness

No they are corrupt and should be closed down

Yes as long as it’s continuing an equal world view for all

No, not until they recognise Taiwan as a country.

How important do you believe it is for countries to work together to fight global pandemics, rather than each nation acting alone?

If you could decide what health problem the WHO focused on next, what issue would you choose and why?

How accountable do you think global health organizations should be to the public or to the countries that fund them?

Do you think you would feel safer in a health emergency with an international health organization taking charge, or do you trust local governments more?

Do you think more attention should be given to diseases in wealthier countries or those that affect mainly developing nations?

In what ways could cutting funding to global health organizations, like the WHO, impact future outbreaks of illnesses like COVID-19?

How would you balance the role of private donations versus government funding in global health organizations like the WHO?

What do you think sounds more valuable—spending money on global health initiatives or addressing local health problems first?

Should wealthy nations contribute more to global health efforts to support poorer countries, or should every country be responsible for their own health system?

How do you think global health organizations, like the WHO, can affect your personal life and health choices?

The who has proven to be a corrupt organisation and funding for overseas health initiatives should be directly controlled by our own bureaucracy to ensure we are truly assisting the needy in areas that can provide for themselves.