Try the political quiz
+

Reply

 @B28STLDanswered…4mos4MO

Should be a combination of the 2 to decide where funding goes. Don't just provide more funding where kids are performing, add funding where it's needed, high teacher turnover and other indicators of a school needing support.

 @528VPLMfrom Queensland  answered…4yrs4Y

By and large schools are useless - I would recommend the government gets rid of them

 @526HK5Ffrom Queensland  answered…4yrs4Y

Some basics should remain centralised, including distribution of water, food, shelter, education and health-care. States should put forth their best plans for delivering high standards of schooling. It appears likely a better model would be central-state collaboration for both education and health. For example, it is incredulous that Australia has 9 different laws regarding abortion in the country in the 21st century!!

 @4ZMJZ4Cfrom Queensland  answered…4yrs4Y

The education system needs an overhaul. We are teaching kids to confirm and live in fear just like most adults do. To not think for themselves and question everything they are being taught.

 @B4SYF8D answered…3 days3D

Should be a mixture of both state and federal but same curriculum Australia wide. Public schools should receive the same amount that is given to private schools

 @B4PBNFQanswered…1wk1W

If the state can show that it is capable of providing ample school funding, then it should be, but states without that ability should remain under federal funding.

 @9J8M5K9Green answered…1yr1Y

Public schools should be funded nationally, meaning teachers in all states are paid equally. This will strengthen the union and allow better delivery of education across the nation.

 @9HQ6N42answered…1yr1Y

The government should be responsible for the funding but if the state wants to fund their schools as well they should

 @9G9LVSYanswered…2yrs2Y

The ridiculous amount given to independent schools should be reduced (not entirely removed). If given over to the states, they shouldn’t just be told to ‘find the money’

 @8QKTDYDanswered…4yrs4Y

 @8K3STZNanswered…5yrs5Y

No, public schools should also receive more funding and private schools less funding, it is creating inequality at the roots of society.

 @B4N89S2Liberalanswered…1wk1W

Albo said that states were already in charge of school funding and wiped all responsibility of this in his debate with Dutton

 @B4N4XC7answered…1wk1W

Should come from both state and federal and more cu ding for regional areas and less for private schools

 @B4DLYRFGreenanswered…3wks3W

No, but there should be greater connection and support for all levels of support and supervision of schools.

 @B4CKLPRanswered…3wks3W

Yes, but the federal government should be able to step in if the states are not seen to be providing adequate funding to all schools.

 @B3QD2B8answered…2mos2MO

Yes, there should be more control to the states but there should still be a minimum budget allocation.

 @B3MLH2Kanswered…2mos2MO

Make it all the same however allow opportunity for further application of resources for areas that need it.

 @B3G4WTPanswered…2mos2MO

All school funding should be administered by the federal government, allocated as a per child level.

 @B39WL9Manswered…2mos2MO

Sate and Federal governments should work collabortatively to fund schools. Federal government should turn focus towards more funding for public schools.

 @B38XXHManswered…2mos2MO

My primary concern with school funding is that we should phase out government funding to private schools.

 @B35DK7Ganswered…2mos2MO

This has already occurred. Rossmoyne high school and Willetton high school have multimillion dollar funding year after year after year and all the schools around get minimal. There is clearly a state influence.

 @B2WNKZ6Laboranswered…2mos2MO

Having been involved in this issue as a senior public servant I can't give a short answer. The ANTA model developed in the early 1990s for vocational education was an excellent model that did not survive John Howard.

 @B2QXMSGGreenanswered…3mos3MO

First University course should be free/government funded, anything after that should fall under HECS debt

 @B2QDW8Wanswered…3mos3MO

School Funding should be jointly funded by both the Federal Government AND State/Territory Government, as the responsibility for School Funding should not be left solely on one or the other alone. Both Federal and each State/Territory Governments should discuss how they can go about funding schools as being a joint-funding thing.

 @B2PYKDQanswered…3mos3MO

Department of Education should be managed by the states, however with reforms and legislation in place to ensure the schools at risk get the assistance they need

 @B2JL7L6answered…3mos3MO

Federal government should assist states if they require additional funding to manage schools otherwise the states should manage their schools

 @B2HZNL3answered…3mos3MO

Have the federal government pay a small part of the funding while the states pay the rest. Making sure schools do not fall under a certain cost of funding.

 @B2FD444answered…3mos3MO

There should be one education policy and curriculum within the country and it should be federally recognised

 @B2CRG6DOne Nationanswered…3mos3MO

Federal government is too big and states fight over funding instead of concentrating on education. There should be federal laws to remove all ideological indoctrination from kindergarten to Higher education. Teach fundamentals, teach kids to be life long learners.

 @9ZR2LN5answered…5mos5MO

Modern Australian governments are untrustworthy be it state or federal, but I will agree because it takes power from the corrupt leftist federal government

 @9YL3RSCLiberalanswered…6mos6MO

A clear and fair funding model should be developed to balance the outcome and result of schools funding.

 @9WTSBDVanswered…6mos6MO

No need for state, should be federal and local council. Move decision making closer to the ground.

 @9WNKMDNanswered…6mos6MO

Depends on what the particular state government was going to do to manage and distribute the funding.

 @9VXB86Wanswered…6mos6MO

Different schools have different needs and State has a better idea of what each school's wants/needs.

 @9VF9ZV2answered…7mos7MO

The federal government should turn over school funding to the states, provided that the states remain impartial to personal earnings of the university and its investors. Education is not a business.

 @9RSXS5Hanswered…9mos9MO

No, money should be shared equally and encouraged to increase this budget for educating future generations

 @9RKKMCBanswered…9mos9MO

i think the federal government should only turn over school funding to only primary school and high school only. However we should pay for university.

 @9KL8KF9Laboranswered…1yr1Y

I think the material thought should be the same across the country, so no I think schools should be federal funding, as there may be perverse incentives from state funding

 @9KD5WJVLaboranswered…1yr1Y

the school system should be a federal only program in fact i would abolish the state governments as it is one useless bureaucracy that doesn't really need to exist

 @9JWPZPKLaboranswered…1yr1Y

Maybe a bit of both, as in the richest states could manage some of their schools with others being federally managed

 @9JHHJ8SLiberalanswered…1yr1Y

Yes because private schools are receiving more funding from the government that public schools, leaving them under funded

 @9FXW3MZanswered…2yrs2Y

no. i dont trust the current victorian government. dan andrews has left however so in the future i may change my mind

 @9FSDG3Qanswered…2yrs2Y

Children should have a coupon that can be used for any public school and have school choice. Let the schools compete to raise quality through competition

 @9F4NRD6Laborfrom Connecticut  answered…2yrs2Y

The state and federal government should each have a fair share in investing into the school system, but the federal government has the right to oversee local government school funding and force towns and cities to put more funding into a school district if they deem that the funding is insufficient.

 @9F3HR4Ranswered…2yrs2Y

We have a federal government and a local government. We do not need state governments at all. Give all federal funding to the local Government to distribute.

 @9DZRS92answered…2yrs2Y

 @9DXR7GGGreenanswered…2yrs2Y

 @9D7QJS7answered…2yrs2Y

Yes only if there is some benefit to the school or it increases their capacity to educate the next generation of society

 @B3PGPZRanswered…2mos2MO

Yes and stop funding elite private schools. No funding should be sent to a school that charges more than $15k annually and funding should be phased out for schools that charge more than $12k annually.

 @B4BJZ68answered…3wks3W

No, there should be one education system across Australia. No child should be disadvantaged by moving state at any age.

 @8D88RLZanswered…5yrs5Y

education should be a federal issue,all children from all states should be taught the same subjects.

 @9BMC72WSocialist Allianceanswered…2yrs2Y

I don’t actually know what this means. I do believe schools should continue being funded by the government, if that’s what it means.

 @9B5GXX2answered…2yrs2Y

 @99ZX9JTanswered…2yrs2Y

The funding should be split between Federal and State levels of Government.

 @93TNBJRanswered…3yrs3Y

They should give the states school funding money and allow the states to divide it equally among the state schools in their state

 @93NXG6Yanswered…3yrs3Y

No, the federal government should get a national curriculum as well as having balanced funding between public and private sectors, so no student will be left behind.

 @93GJJHJanswered…3yrs3Y

The federal government and the states should split their school funding

 @93D5LZ2answered…3yrs3Y

Australian schooling should be a federal syllabus therefore funded by the Aust government

 @934PYGPanswered…3yrs3Y

Ultimately, as long as schools are sufficiently funded, I'm not concerned which government it comes from. Perhaps a combination of both would be optimal.

 @9342BL7answered…3yrs3Y

 @933RC79answered…3yrs3Y

 @933LLWLanswered…3yrs3Y

Changing the responsible government won’t address underlying issues around equity

 @9337GBZanswered…3yrs3Y

 @932D2ZRGreenanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only with a base outline of minimum requirements of equal opportunity and equity to be made available across all schools and students within the state.

 @92ZH7P8answered…3yrs3Y

Federal government should oversee education nationally and take it away from states

 @92ZDMK6answered…3yrs3Y

Government shouldn’t fund schools, education should be privatised. Families could receive an education subsidy from the government to put towards their children’s education.

 @92ZD89XLiberal Democratanswered…3yrs3Y

School funding should be given to the parents (with suitable controls).

 @92Z8JGJanswered…3yrs3Y

The department does not no what there doing the should be run by teachers at least they know what's schools need and students

 @92YKYN7answered…3yrs3Y

The funding should be allocated in the form of vouchers on a per student basis to empower parental choice.

 @92YFNP2answered…3yrs3Y

 @92Y9648Greenanswered…3yrs3Y

No, but the way in which funding is doled out needs reviewing i.e. private vs state school funding disparities (to state school disadvantage).

 @92XVRH9answered…3yrs3Y

75% of funding should be provided at a state level the remaining 25% should be provided at a Federal level.

 @92X6Y87answered…3yrs3Y

No, education should be equal across all states and therefore looked after federally

 @92WB3W4answered…3yrs3Y

No, the federal government should turn over school funding to parents and tax them less.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...