Should the Australian government continue to invest billions of dollars into the development of the National Broadband Network?

should have been privatised from the beginning.

Rich Western cointries should be investing money to help poorer countries instead of moving forward and forgetting about those in need

In a science where technology advances are inevitable, why would we commit to a project which will almost certainly be outdated by the time it is rolled out. This is a massive land area we are trying to cover. Wireless has to be the way forward.

Again more fraud in the government and businesses taking advantage of stupid politicians. The massive blowout with almost no accountability is absurd. I say privatise only because governments these days lack the capability to do government works effectively. We can't even build roads, almost all major roads recently have been done privately and now we pay toll. Just another tax on the people this will be the same. so sad.

Yes, it is crucial to the economy and for public communication. But they need to get the costs under control

Yes, create the network and then carry out bids to earn money back

Continue to invest money into the development of the National Broadband Network, however, they shouldn't be investing billions of dollars.

Netflix and network and teams provider a unlock limited and economy with tellie presenter of prime minister Scott Morrison

Need better internet

NBN should be government funded and free for all citizens to use.

No, the money should be invested into development of better forms of internet access

Government to the node and then private to the property.

Yes, but only because the coalition government screwed it up for Murdoch by downgrading & overspending - don't give it away to the rich now, just when it's nearly finished

NBN has been very poorly managed.

Only if nbn is improved in the fibre to the node.

No, spend more and get the best internet solution

Do whatever Japan did

No Already too slow and outdated

yes and start planning it’s replacement now

They should replace copper with fibre as per the original plan.

Yes, as long as it is done properly the first time.

No, a focus of both fibre to the node and wireless must be utilised.

no b1tch it doesn't even work properly and is slow as fvck

Yes but not as much as we're doing

Yes, but use newer, actually useful, equipment so the network isn’t receptive.

Yes, but prioritize the areas of high population density and let the project fund it as much as possible.

Yes, they should replace copper with fibre as per the original plan.

Yes, but only Fibre to the Premises.

Yes, but not in it's current form.

No, it is redundant technology already. (Starlink & similar technological developments will supersede quickly.)

Invest in 5g technology that will make NBN obsolete

Yes, but regulate the money strongly, and fix the cost. If companies run over or are not efficient then they lose money.

Build to the node then if people need fibre to home, pay themselves from node to home. Save 60 billion this way.

No - apparently we don't have the money for our elderly peolpe who paid their taxes to watch all the parasites we import get everything and they want to worry about a computer going faster how about the real issues that affect eveyone not just a few

Go with cost effective approach and allow individuals to elect to pay for fibre to home where required

I think it is best, but should be left as a lower priority. Once Australia actually has money (is out of debt), we should start focusing on these things.

The government should not be involved in any industry like rail and banking