A national identification system is a standardized ID system that provides a unique identification number or card to all citizens, which can be used to verify identity and access various services. Proponents argue that it enhances security, streamlines identification processes, and helps prevent identity fraud. Opponents argue that it raises privacy concerns, could lead to increased government surveillance, and may infringe on individual freedoms.
@9WD555W6mos6MO
Yes, as long as it is used only for identifying, protecting and preventing fraud.
Yes, but it may only be valid for low importance services, and should have strict privacy protection legislation
@B4DC8T82wks2W
Only if it's based on blockchain technology and is transparent and public ledger, providing individual ownership of identity, not government owned.
@B4BSKMW2wks2W
No way this is dangerous and it opens the door for draconian rules and regulations which will not work for the public but against them
@B4BPF7T2wks2W
Yes, but we should utilize already existing forms of identification like driver's licenses and passports.
tfn and id cards should already be doing this, maybe add something for people who don't have a tfn and/or id card or license.
Yes, but only for government/additional identification purposes, not compulsory or necessary for all circumstances
Yes, but not for fraud - it's helpful to improve the efficiency of government systems and consolidates the security of the personal information of citizens in a trusted place (rather than the current situation where every digital service takes your data without security oversight with impunity)
@B3QD2B81mo1MO
Yes, only if the process of safeguarding information is transparent and there is no coercion to join.
@B45LH7Y3wks3W
Yes, but only if this is voluntary and everyone (including officials) participate on a level playing field.
@B44XTRW3wks3W
Yes but only as a separate identification number and not a collector of data - like an expanded version of the medicare number
@B3TW6H41mo1MO
No, there is already a nationally recognised identification system in-place with the use of passports and government-issued licenses.
@B2YMYNF2mos2MO
While it sounds like a good idea on the face of it there isn't an implementation known to humanity that doesn't result in data egress and non effective systems. Systems like this, for this purpose, end up costing a fortune and merely marginalizing vulnerable people further. You can only shore up your palisades at the pointy ends, not individualize the problem.
@9V9PLZTOne Nation6mos6MO
Australia is already a relatively safe place, and while security should still be instilled, it must not breach the privacy of current citizens.
@9TQPHWX7mos7MO
The repairs should implement is national system fraud identity as said government feedback admins
@B2RJZLT2mos2MO
yes but only for identifying fraud as Australia is already a relatively safe place, and while security should still be instilled, it must not breach the privacy of current citizens.
@B2NHZ37 2mos2MO
Isn't this just an ID, which most people have because they have a drivers licence?? And mang others just have plain ID if not.
@B28STLD3mos3MO
Depending on the powers given to the government regarding the standardised if system, because technically a drivers licence or 18+ card covers this already for photo identification. Medicare and other documents cover for verification otherwise.
@9ZZ7YJ34mos4MO
No, the government has demonstrated time and time again that they are utterly incapable of protecting our identities. Alternatively, "I'll take, what is a drivers license/18+ card for 500 Alex:
@9ZQSH895mos5MO
No, this allows excessive government intrusion into our lives.
@B35CXGY2mos2MO
I believe that there should be a measure in place but it mustn’t give unwarranted access to all our personal information
@B33ZG2T2mos2MO
No. National ID system should only be in place for those who have committed a crime, are deemed a national security risk, and to those coming from high risk countries.
@B2YRFBD2mos2MO
Yes, as long as it is securely designed and respectful of privacy. This already basically exists, it would simply be rolling all state and national ID systems into an all-in-one document that carries relevant information digitally, with appropriate safeguards for privacy and security.
@9RZM3V98mos8MO
No, not until society has a clear idea of what privacy is and means.
@9QS3S9L9mos9MO
No, not until those in power can be held accountable for their actions, and transparency in their actions are encouraged.
@9P5SQM410mos10MO
Yes, as long as they don't use it for other purposes
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.