Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

50 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9mos9MO

Yes

 @9VK64ZZLiberalfrom Guam  agreed…4mos4MO

Rent control stabilizes communities, reducing displacement by 20% and ensuring affordable housing for low-income families. Say yes to fairness!

 @9NVZ3QLCoalitiondisagreed…8mos8MO

It is not the government's responsibility to manage how much landlords charge their tenants through rent.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

Yes, housing is a basic right that should be affordable to anyone

 @B28FW34agreed…1mo1MO

In Australia, one in five renters spends more than 30% of their income on rent, which is considered the threshold for housing stress. In some cities, like Sydney and Melbourne, that figure is even higher.

 @779PQHTLabor agreed…2mos2MO

In controlling the cost of rent it de-incentivizes landholders to purchase more properties then necessary as it makes them a far less lucrative investment and may actually leas to more properties being put up for sale potentially bringing down excessive property prices

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

No, ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate instead

 @9ZZP7B9Green disagreed…2mos2MO

the housing investors will still buy the real estate, the foreigners are being just as out-bidded by the tax funded investors as the general australian public

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

No, incentivize the development of new housing instead

 @B2HRJFFfrom British Columbia  disagreed…2wks2W

People can't afford to live, people are abusing the housing market for investment properties with the incentives that already exist. This needs to stop

 @779PQHTLabor disagreed…2mos2MO

What prevents current landholders and Foreign investors from simply purchasing these buildings and continuing to artificially increase the cost of rent?

 @B22YRTGLabordisagreed…2mos2MO

This is coming from people who own their homes and do not need to make ends meet every week on pennies.

 @B2PMP86disagreed…3 days3D

Introducing new housing without regulation only allows those already with multiple houses using it to generate income to grow more wealthy and control and raise rent prices even more.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

No, rent controls have been shown to limit the supply of housing

 @B28FW34disagreed…1mo1MO

There are examples from countries with strong rent control policies, like Germany and Switzerland, where rent controls have not led to a shortage of housing. Instead, these policies have been paired with other measures like public housing initiatives, which help increase supply while ensuring fairness in rental markets.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

 @B2KWFG6from Kuala Lumpur  answered…1wk1W

yes and ban corporate, foreign investor and rich people from purchasing residential real estate too.

 @B2FC36Tanswered…3wks3W

Yes, housing should be affordable to everyone AND corporate and foreign investors need to be banned from purchasing real estate

 @B28STLDanswered…4wks4W

Yes, but it should also limit what house prices can be as well for those buying. Too many Australians are priced out of the housing market.

 @B24STGSLaboranswered…2mos2MO

Yes, but do it on a limited scale at first to judge results and ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate as well.

 @B23CMCGanswered…2mos2MO

Land lords should be able to charge enough rent to cover costs of property repayments and up keep.

 @B22G8ZNanswered…2mos2MO

Depends on how much they’re limiting (if it’s less costly, theoretically it’s better for people), but I question whether the government actually cares about rising rent. So I don’t trust that a regulation will decrease prices.

 @9ZVWP9ZLiberalanswered…2mos2MO

Yes, however incentivize the development of new housing and cap rental prices in areas that are not in tourist locations

 @9ZTPDVMLaboranswered…2mos2MO

Yes, and ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing any form of real estate that is only used as an asset and not as a home.

 @9ZPK338answered…2mos2MO

Yes, in the form of reducing how much a landlord can increase rent in an amount of time

 @9ZM933Ganswered…3mos3MO

There needs to be a way to ensure a fair control for both renters and landlords, however Government regulations is what pushes prices up so better start looking at yourself first and once you get your own spending and regulations that cost more under control you will probably find there needs no control policy. The mess we are in points solely back to government greed and lack of thought about anything other than the lining of government pockets before they retire into cosy positions we pay them for overseas. Government is a SHAM! You dismantled public housing and let private interests make your people more vulnerable than needed to be

 @9YL3RSCLiberalanswered…3mos3MO

I’ve no references to support any policy but active policy creation in a normal free market should be made with great care to consider the positive and negative effects.

 @9RBCFVBanswered…6mos6MO

Yes but it would be determined by multiple factors, not the same amount for each house.

 @9QQ4W2Fanswered…7mos7MO

 @9P4BD2Lanswered…8mos8MO

 @9VMMVPCanswered…4mos4MO

No longer relevant as they are only allowed to change the rent a certain amount of times each year.

 @9V79F4WLaboranswered…4mos4MO

Trial rent controls in low-income areas, and the government should increase investment in rental properties

 @9SWQZYBDavid Pocockanswered…5mos5MO

Yes, but only to limit how often landlords can raise rents and improve housing security for renters

 @9992HTRSocialist Alliance  from GU  answered…8mos8MO

 @9MLP43Yanswered…9mos9MO

No, because every landlord has the right to set the rental price with the situation happening during that time.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Have you or anyone you know ever struggled with the cost of rent? What could have made the situation better?

 @B2M23Y3answered…5 days5D

No the government should invest money into lowering the cost of housing such that it becomes more affordable

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Do you think it's fair for people to stay in the same apartment forever if the rent is kept low, while others can't find a place to live?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Could rent controls, in your view, ever be unfair to landlords? Why or why not?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Can the government truly balance the needs of both tenants and landlords when deciding rent policies, or is one side always favored?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How would you feel if your rent didn't increase but there were fewer apartments available in your area?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

What do you think is more important: affordable rent for everyone or better quality housing, even if it's more expensive?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

If rent control meant more people could stay in their homes, but fewer new apartments were built, would it still be worth it?

 @B2MJPPRanswered…4 days4D

Yes, housing is a basic human right and should be affordable for everyone. Rent control measures paired with public housing initiatives and strict limitations/incredibly increased taxes/bans on buying residential real estate should be put in place for corporate, foreign investor, and multi-property (more than 2) owning parties as well. Owning unused/abandoned residential real estate should be severely penalised too to encourage renting and/or selling of the property to allows for more people to have an affordable roof over their head. Air BNBs are also a massive issue.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How might rent prices affect your decisions when choosing where to live after high school or college?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

If rent control was implemented in your city, how do you think it would affect your neighborhood in the long run?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How would you decide what's a fair rent for an apartment: the market price, the tenant's income, or something else?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...