Try the political quiz

31 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9mos9MO

Yes

 @9ZF4DJWLabordisagreed…4mos4MO

You cannot guarantee that this access will not be used by another party in power in future after expanding upon what they deem to be a national security risk

 @9ZZ7YJ3answered…3mos3MO

No, any backdoor that exists for national security purposes also exists for anyone else clever enough to find it. There is no such thing as a backdoor that only specific people can use.

 @B388WPZanswered…4 days4D

No, but they should be required to hand over any relevant information in regards to an investigation

 @B2WPRX8answered…2wks2W

Government should only be targeting criminals and have policies and procedures in place to avoiding harming innocent people and pay for any damages caused to those innocent people

 @B2JP85Qanswered…1mo1MO

No but increase spending for programs that infiltrate drug, sex trafficking and other illegal operations

 @9ZLXJRXOne Nationanswered…3mos3MO

Under strict conditions. Don’t want government investigating people for disagreeing with government policy

 @9WV5Y6Zanswered…4mos4MO

Possibly, again, this appears to be for of a federal government question. Sounds suspicious or not in depth with detail etc.

 @9WR5QQWLaboranswered…4mos4MO

Tech campanies should be required only when there is sufficient reason to believe activities pertaining to the risk of national security are occuring, it should not be by default.

 @9WK3YLPanswered…4mos4MO

maybe but there needs to be new regulations put in place to protect privecy such as needing a worrant for someting to do that kind of investigation

 @9WBP9K5answered…4mos4MO

Like bugging and telephone wire taps in the past, it would seem reasonable for gov agencies to have access where a reasonable suspicion exists and a magistrate has granted access.

 @9W7FMBVanswered…4mos4MO

I believe no for a general rule, as that can be harmful for privacy, yet there should be systems in place to flag dangerous online activity like engaging in human trafficking and weapons trafficking.

 @9SYC4SQanswered…6mos6MO

 @9PWFPP4answered…8mos8MO

No I general, unless there is a court order to investigate a specific individual

 @9PDPBQYanswered…8mos8MO

Yes, but only in extreme situations, since it is necessary to combat terrorism.

 @9NZLVN9answered…9mos9MO

 @9NT25LDanswered…9mos9MO

No, no matter how good the security is someone will find a way to compromise it

 @9NHLFQYanswered…9mos9MO

In an ideal world with no corruption and exploitation of personal data, this would be ok. But since it's currently not this ideal world, I'd have to say no for the time being. Or at least if it was required, there would need to be strict restrictions and rules.

 @B3BQXBJLaboranswered…17hrs17H

Yes, but their must be conditions and proper procedure in place so that the information is only accessed under official investigation from police and law enforcement bodies.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Is there a point where you believe national security measures can go too far in accessing personal information?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Can you think of a time when you would have wanted law enforcement to have more access to information to solve a crime?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

How do you balance your right to privacy with the needs of the community for safety and security?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

If given a choice, would you opt in or out of allowing surveillance access to your digital communications, and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Do you believe there's a way to provide security agencies the information they need without violating individual privacy?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Reflecting on historical abuses of power, how do you feel about giving authorities more access to private communications?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Would you trust your government with a 'key' to everyone's private messages, under strict regulations and oversight?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

If you had to design a system, how would you ensure authorities could fight crime and terrorism without overstepping into unnecessary surveillance?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

How would you feel if your personal messages could be read by someone else, even if it was for national security?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

What are your thoughts on sacrificing some privacy for the sake of potentially preventing crime or terrorism?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...