Should politicians over 75 years of age have required to pass a mental competency test?

Yes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test

Yes, and ban anyone over the age of 75 from running for office

No

No, mental competency is too subjective

No, if their constituents believe that they are no longer capable, then they will no longer vote for them.

Politicians should be subjected to, and be required to pass, personality and mental competency tests before they are eligible to take office; to ensure that we don't end up with narcissistic sociopaths as leaders.

The government should be full of government loyalists of 40 years and younger for age, no need for testing.

No, it should be up to the populace to determine if or not the politician in question is mentally competent.

All politicians should have annual mental competency and psych health assessment tests AT THEIR EXPENSE NOT OURS to remain in parliament.
The people should be comfortable knowing we arent being run by narcissistic, psychopathic, greedy, out of touch with the average public, mentally inept humans as it appears we are run by now.

Yes and ban them from running if over the age of retirement. This testing should be done for those over 60 years of age

Every politician should be required to pass a mental competency test.

no one is in government for that long usually resigned or retired

How does the concept of 'age equals wisdom' fit into the debate on mandatory retirements for certain professions?

In what ways might mandatory retirement ages impact the diversity and representation in politics or judiciary?

If you had the power, what criteria would you set for someone to remain in a professional role as they get older?

How can younger generations benefit from or be disadvantaged by mandatory retirement ages in leadership positions?

What are the pros and cons of having age limits for high-responsibility roles, like politicians or judges?

Is there an age at which people should no longer make significant societal decisions? Why or why not?

What alternative measures could be taken to ensure that professionals remain competent in their roles without setting age limits?

How would you feel if your favorite public leader had to retire at a certain age, regardless of their abilities?

Can you share a time when you noticed someone's abilities didn't match with societal expectations due to their age?

Imagine a scenario where a highly skilled leader is forced to retire due to age. How would that affect society's progress?