Try the political quiz

0 Reply

 @9947KGRGreenanswered…1yr1Y

Yes and No, depending on which level of government they want to be elected into

 @8YHWBXVanswered…2yrs2Y

 @HippopiJanswered…2yrs2Y

No, but they should be prohibited from owning any stock investments and must declare all other investments immediately.

 @92DKHTJLiberal Democratanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and also required to release their medical records & Yes, and require a public audit each year they are in office.

 @92C9PYHanswered…2yrs2Y

Enough information that we can be assured of their associations so can ensure they are correctly excluded from votes where they have a financial interest.

 @9286YNQanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and all assets & investments should be placed in an invisible trust while they are in office.

 @8ZPJRZJLaboranswered…2yrs2Y

Depends if they've been convicted of a white collar crime such as money laundering. Plus they should be truthfully disclose their tax returns if not, they should be convicted

 @8Z855C3Laboranswered…2yrs2Y

Yes and audits. They also shouldn't be able to be elected under one party and change post election. I don't agree with party votes either they represent their electorate not their own views, professional or religion etc

 @8Z37HMNIndependentanswered…2yrs2Y

No, however they should be subject to a third party audit whilst in office

 @8YWHK23Greenanswered…2yrs2Y

yes, but only to a small group of influential citizens who can confirm or deny they are on the books correctly

 @8YLR3QKanswered…2yrs2Y

There will be no candidates and no voting only one supreme monarch/Dictator who is a Christian and serves god

 @lmnop1567Greenanswered…2yrs2Y

No, they should be audited yearly to prevent corruption, but should not have to be released publicly unless fraud is found

 @924SVDGLaboranswered…2yrs2Y

their income shouldn’t affect their ability to do their job to the best of their abilities, and the income shouldn’t be incentive to be employed in that job.

 @923F65BGreenanswered…2yrs2Y

No, but they shouldn’t be allowed to hold majority shares in private business and penalties for failure to declare conflicts of interest should be stricter

 @922T23Xanswered…2yrs2Y

 @8ZTYJ9SGreenanswered…2yrs2Y

As long as the ATO confirms they are are paying the right amount of tax for their pay grade, it's fine.

 @8YXSKP2United Australiaanswered…2yrs2Y

No, they should just be paid far less. A career in Public service should not be motivated by financial gain.

 @8Z7MRZ6Laboranswered…2yrs2Y

No but they should be audited each year they are in office. They should release what companies they have stakes in and which electorates they own property in

 @8ZHYK8NLaboranswered…2yrs2Y

No, but they should be examined and determine any conflict of interest. Would respect them for doing this.

 @8CLZPSWanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and also required to release their mdical records and require a public audit each year they are in office

 @8JTLVB4answered…3yrs3Y

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...