High-speed rail networks are fast train systems that connect major cities, providing a quick and efficient alternative to car and air travel. Proponents argue that it can reduce travel times, lower carbon emissions, and stimulate economic growth through improved connectivity. Opponents argue that it requires significant investment, may not attract enough users, and funds could be better used elsewhere.
Yes, as long as they are environmentally friendly.
@9RZDKRX5mos5MO
They should invest in it themselves. Subsidies only increases the cost to 3rd parties aka childcare.
@9RTTQWK5mos5MO
Remove the red tape and regulation and allow the market to take care of it.
@9QZJSXK6mos6MO
High speed rail networks should be nationalised only.
@9QS3S9L6mos6MO
Yes, these should go to private companies who compete to build the best networks possible.
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@9QYCGD36mos6MO
Yes providing it does not lead to excessive fares and tolls like the road system
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.