Should the government fund research into geoengineering as a way to combat climate change?

No

Yes, but fund prevention first. We need to know about the possibilities and consequences, but prevention is more important and should be focused on first.

Yes, absolutely increase funding on research on this topic, ensure our agriculture and food production is protected from harm whilst searching for ways to combat anthropogenic climate change

No, we should invest in renewable energy and phase out non-sustainable practices

Only if it does not cause harm to people or the environment

Yes, we have the money to do it, and it will greatly combat climate change.

Yes, as long as there are strict requirements for reporting, safety, and emergency management.

Yes, but only with complete transparency regarding methodology and applications.

Yes, it could possibly prove useful if standard methods are not enough.

Prefer this to be done on a private level, but if it can be done in a cost effective way, it may be worthwhile.

Yes, we won’t know what can or shouldn’t be done without research

climate is changing. Adapt like we're meant to do! Stop trying to mess with nature and causing more problems!!!

No as the earth always changes. I mean how dumb are some of you

Yes, if they are also investing in everything else to prevent catastrophic climate change

Yes over subsidising climate damaging subsidies and investments. However it must prioritise proven interventions such as nationwide transition to renewable energy (this does not include nuclear or gas).

The opponents make a good point that there could be 'unforeseen negative consequences' but, if it was successful it could be very useful in finding solutions for global warming.

Yes, but not as the only option to combat climate change.

Bro, just stop habitat destruction, stop outputting fossil fuel emissions, and stop waste and pollution. These are the most important and proven solutions, not geoengineering.

Yes, but to tread carefully and vote before implementing anything

Climate change is a result of the failures of capitalist logic and ideology. There is no scenario where an economic system based on infinite economic growth on a planet with finite resources works. It's objectively a bad system. Marxism-Leninism will solve what capitalism can't, what it refuses to because "it's not profitable"

Do you think altering Earth’s climate systems is ethical if it slows down global warming but disturbs ecosystems?

What would you say to someone who believes humans are responsible for fixing every problem we caused, even if the solutions may be dangerous?

How much do you trust science to solve big environmental problems like climate change, and why?

If you could control the weather for a day, what changes would you make and why?

How would you react if your favorite natural landscape was altered by a scientific solution meant to stabilize the climate?

Do you think humans should intervene in nature's processes to prevent further climate change, or should we focus solely on reducing emissions?

How would you feel if a sudden change in technology could instantly cool the planet but had unknown risks?

What role do you think future generations should play in deciding the solutions to climate change we use today?

Would knowing that geoengineering could affect countries differently change how you feel about it?

In your opinion, should humanity take risks to drastically fix the environment, or should we tread carefully with small steps?