Try the political quiz

26 Replies

 @B4BR4LHanswered…2wks2W

The collection and use of government already exceeds the rights of the population. To continue is to lean slowly further in to dictatorialship. It is inevitable, as societies drift between liberty and security. Freedom only permits itself within one regime, safety is overtly permitted within the other. Neither thing should be absolutely allowed.

 @B3XHHSXOne Nationanswered…4wks4W

No - But make it illegal for companies to pester people with spam emails and messages unless it is agreed on. If the box is not ticked to receive information, via email or SMS, they should be held liable if they continue to do so.

 @B3QHWFSOne Nation answered…1mo1MO

Yes! It’s our data and our business no one else of what we do on our devices not yours or anyone’s but ourselves

 @B3HFNZTanswered…1mo1MO

Yes, the current regulations should be stricter but more importantly the penalties should be higher and effectively enforced.

 @B34GHTKLaboranswered…2mos2MO

I belive that companies shoulld be allowed to ho;d data in order to run thier apps but thier should be montoring in order to ensure safety

 @B32SV3Canswered…2mos2MO

The government should impose stricter regulations on the collection and use of personal data but should not use it for there own purposes

 @B25WTLSLiberalanswered…4mos4MO

The government does the same thing. If they impose regulations on private companies for doing so, then they're hypocrites.

 @9ZR2LN5answered…5mos5MO

Absolutely, private companies that collect personal data should be transferred to the state and become Crown Corporations

 @9WRSBBBanswered…6mos6MO

Yes, and the right to withold personal data from collection and use should always be within the user's rights.

 @9VW3SGYanswered…6mos6MO

I advocate for stronger regulations that safeguard personal data and ensure that individuals retain full control over their information, allowing them to choose when and how it is shared.

 @9TQ5HHDanswered…7mos7MO

No, this is the individual's responsibility, but the government should employ initiatives to prevent data misuse.

 @9992HTR  from GU  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, collecting personal data, either by a government or a company, is an authoritarian invasion of privacy.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Do you think there should be a limit on what personal data companies can collect? Why or why not?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

How much privacy are you willing to sacrifice for convenience in your daily digital interactions?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Have you ever read a privacy policy in full before using a service? What influenced your decision?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Would you pay for a service you currently use for free if it meant your data wouldn't be collected?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

How do you decide which apps or services get to access your personal information?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Do you believe children and teenagers should have more stringent data privacy protections online? Why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

In a world that's constantly online, what does privacy mean to you personally?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

If you could change one thing about how companies handle your data, what would it be and why?

 @B4KZYZRanswered…3 days3D

No, but personal data should be considered as the person's property, and allow them to sell it, tax free, to companies.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

How would you feel if your online searches today were made public tomorrow?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Can you share a time when an ad online felt eerily specific to you? How did it make you feel?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...