Militarization of police refers to the use of military equipment and tactics by law enforcement officers. This includes the use of armored vehicles, assault rifles, flashbang grenades, sniper rifles, and SWAT teams. Proponents argue that this equipment increases officers’ safety and enables them to better protect the public and other first responders. Opponents argue that police forces which received military equipment were more likely to have violent encounters with the public.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Ideology:
Federal Electorate:
Local Government Area:
State Electorate:
Suburb:
Postcode:
@ISIDEWITH4yrs4Y
No
@9YLY9SJIndependent2mos2MO
I’d rather them have the military equipment they need and not need it, than need the equipment and not have it.
Looking at America Numerous studies and instances demonstrate the negative impact of police militarization. A 2017 study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that militarized police units are more likely to use force, leading to civilian injuries. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) reports that militarized tactics disproportionately affect marginalized communities. Moreover, the 1033 Program, allowing the transfer of military equipment to police, resulted in instances like the Ferguson protests, where militarized responses escalated tensions. Redirecting resourc… Read more
@9LPRH3W8mos8MO
I agree with police allowed to use military grade equipment to save our Australian people and kill the terrorists that come to our country.
@ISIDEWITH4yrs4Y
Yes
@9LPCM8V8mos8MO
Police do not lack the equipment to deal with the threats they face currently, and escalation of force serves no purpose here - and may indeed backfire as armed criminals now need to themselves bring more firepower to deal with the police threat.
In a terrorist hostage situation, it is not the lack of military grade guns, ammo and armour that prevents police from resolving the situation, any more than it is a lack of access to tanks, submarines or bombers. The same applies for other terrorist attacks such as Bondi stabbings or Bourke Street massacre. The equipment available to police is alread… Read more
@9LN9SFG8mos8MO
This could encourage crime and leave the police with less resources to deal with a seriously large crime like terrorism
@9GWBWLJ1yr1Y
The best counter argument to the Yes position on Demilitarize the Police is that it could make police officers less safe and less effective at doing their jobs. Police officers need to be able to protect themselves and the public from dangerous individuals and situations. Military-grade equipment, such as armored vehicles and assault rifles, can help police officers do this safely and effectively. Additionally, police officers often need to de-escalate situations that could turn violent. Military-grade equipment can give police officers the tools they need to do this without using deadly forc… Read more
@ISIDEWITH4yrs4Y
Yes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment
@9LSXWGP8mos8MO
Even with training, there will always remain an over-zealous or bigoted few who will leap at the chance to harm a civilian.
@9LSXJG78mos8MO
Even with training, there will always remain an over-zealous or bigoted few who will leap at the chance to harm a civilian.
It is important to make sure that the police know how to handle guns to avoid any accidental killing of a suspect.
@ISIDEWITH4yrs4Y
Yes, but only in response to extreme situations
Demilitarizing the police promotes community trust, de-escalation, and effective resource allocation. Overreliance on military equipment can strain relations, escalate situations, and divert funds from essential social programs. Investing in community-oriented policing fosters safer environments, strengthens ties between law enforcement and citizens, and addresses the root causes of crime.
@ISIDEWITH4yrs4Y
@9T6W4G64mos4MO
Yes, but only in response to extreme situation, and with extensive and strict training on how and when to use the equipment
@9SQ56QG4mos4MO
if local police are to use them, only use them in response on extreme situations when external and higher agencies of help are too far away from the point of contact.
yes and no I agree with only with strict training on how and when but also if a higher agency can deal with the ssiue then they should not police
add a separate government department for homeland security as a middle between the police and the adf
@9LG79679mos9MO
Yes, but only in response to extreme circumstances where the people using the weapons have strict training on how and when to use the equipment.
yes, but only in specific circumstances such as an attempted coup or other large scale crimes such as terrorism
it depends on the situations
@9BTZD7M2yrs2Y
Only if they have been highly trained, have limited access and equipment amount, and have regulations.
@9BQ3PLS2yrs2Y
Yes, but it would depend on the extremity of the situation
@99YF5VK2yrs2Y
Yes but only with proper training and in response to extreme situations
@97N26XN2yrs2Y
yes but if it's something like Smoke grenades flash bangs etc they need to have permission but if it's something serious than no permission is need
@96HTVY32yrs2Y
Yes, but only in resposnse to extreme situations and with strict training on how and when to use the equiptment
@9383K2P3yrs3Y
Yes, with strict training and in extreme situations.
@9352ZTN3yrs3Y
No, and they should be trained how to diffuse situations non-violently
@934Y6663yrs3Y
No, police should not have access to anything denied to the public
Only if they are trained and have refreshment courses every 6month and only in the most extreme situations
@92VD5XH3yrs3Y
Only in extreme situations and with strict training on how to and when to use equipment
@92PZDQ83yrs3Y
@92C89MCIndependent3yrs3Y
No, they should be limited to only what private citizens can legally own
@92C7ZTD3yrs3Y
Yes, only in extreme situations and with strict training on how and when to use equipment
@92897W7Independent3yrs3Y
Yes to equipment, no to weapons
@9285BFB3yrs3Y
Yes, but police accountability should be meaningfully improved
@926XFTCOne Nation3yrs3Y
For what?? These questions are ridiculous
Yes, but only non-lethal equipment
Yes, but only in response to situations where it is necessary and under strict regulations
Yes But only in protests or demonstrations
@8ZJJ6NH3yrs3Y
Reasonable force as required. With military equipment comes military enrollment and relevant training.
@8ZFJLLYIndependent3yrs3Y
Yes, but not for uniformed police. We have special police units for this as well as, not to mention, the military
@8ZFCMVD3yrs3Y
The police are becoming overpowering and threatening. When I was a child I wanted to be a police woman but now after thirty years of community work, I wonder if it is just those who like to dominate people instead of caring for people.
Only if they are fully trained.
they should know how to use them but are allowed to only if needed
@8Z8XM7G3yrs3Y
if they have all the right training and knowledge for the use of the equipment, and only in serious sitatuions
@8Z5YDPTIndependent3yrs3Y
Yes, but only in extreme response and if they have strict training on how and when to use the equipment.
@8Z3HTL83yrs3Y
The police should be abolished.
It depends what the military grade equipment is and what its intended use is. I mean, military grade equipment could mean state of the art night vision goggles or it could mean an RPG..
@8YXSKP2United Australia3yrs3Y
Yes, but so should regular license holding citizens.
The police and military should be separated. If needed, the police should call in the military.
No, not until we are ensuring that our police all have to receive a university degree for their police certificate.
@8W8TPTL3yrs3Y
Yes but In dealing with terrorist attacks.
@8TK8FQQ3yrs3Y
Yes, if it is a federal police department
@8QP3PZM4yrs4Y
Certain country's will require this but Australia would not
@8PGGMLM4yrs4Y
Yes, but only high ranking cops should be able to use the equipment.
Yes, but only to respond to extreme situations and with scrutinous training on how and when to use the equipment.
@9C2KGFR2yrs2Y
Yes but with proper training and only in the most dangerous and extreme situations.
@9BWTVF92yrs2Y
they should get to use tear gas on the criminals
Yes, but only in extreme situations and with strict training on how to use the equipment
@9BRTY9J2yrs2Y
No, other than in situations where the higher agencies are not in the vicinity as a last resort option and only after proper training on when and how to use equipment.
Depends on like, what police rank I guess and what offences the police deal with, I don't think equipment should be given to every police department only high well trained ons.
@9B5G37C2yrs2Y
within special units that have very strict training, like SWAT. not every officer needs military grade weapons, but they should be available if absolutely needed
@99Z6RC22yrs2Y
Police should be allowed in very specific extreme situations, but all efforts should be made to contact higher agencies wherever possible.
@99GTTNL2yrs2Y
No because, military is higher then police, and police should only be trained to use equipment related to them, Military train for years and years to use 'Military grade equipment' and they should stick with that.
Where special training is provided, e.g. SWAT teams, they should be allowed.
They should only have access to the same weapons as civilians.
@98XSFB92yrs2Y
yes but only when there are extreme circumstances like hostage settings or mass shootings
@984C83N2yrs2Y
Yes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment and only in extreme situations that cannot be handled by a higher agency in a quick and efficient manner.
They should make a Police force cadet program.
@97ZWQ5V2yrs2Y
Yes, but only in response to extreme situations and with serious consequences when used improperly
@95X4KG22yrs2Y
Yes, but only in response to extreme situations and with stirct training on how and when to use the equipment
No, they escalate situations
Depends on who manufacturers them. Let’s not support private arms dealers.
@8YP2T5TLiberal Democrat3yrs3Y
Police should not have weapons that the public cannot possess.
Yes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment and in extreme stances
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
