Diesel emissions standards regulate the amount of pollutants that diesel engines can emit to reduce air pollution. Proponents argue that stricter standards improve air quality and public health by reducing harmful emissions. Opponents argue that it increases costs for manufacturers and consumers and could reduce the availability of diesel vehicles.
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
Yes
Any and all Emission standards only serve to hurt the pockets of the poor. Our current emission standards are fine.
@9ZJWQMBOne Nation2mos2MO
This question needs to be more specific. Is the question talking about the diesel emissions form everyday traffic? Why go after small emissions vehicles when cruse-liners emit at least a hundred thousand times the emissions than everyday traffic for nothing but mere leisure?
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
No
Any and all Emission standards only serve to hurt the pockets of the poor. Our current emission standards are fine.
@9ZJWQMBOne Nation2mos2MO
Dunno, cannot be bothered. After all if you were that passionate to even create these questions why would you not research this yourself, rather than ask a bunch of half assed students who couldn't be bothered to answer the question, as much as spare a thought for the matter.
No, but incentivise manufacturers to be more strict with their emission standards and to retire diesel vehicles.
Given the fact China, India and Russia provide more carbon emissions than the rest of the world combined, any restrictions we put on ourselves feels largely ceremonial and pointless
@9W7FMBV3mos3MO
Emissions standards should consist of reliably getting eco-friendly energy to the public, incentivising energy and not hurting people immediately as well as giving time for energy companies to switch over to not bankrupt businesses.
@9VVZXF93mos3MO
Diesel engines may make more pollution but changing to a petrol engine is only a little step and not the overall answer.
@9SYC4SQ4mos4MO
Yes but add a bit of subsidies for consumers who can’t afford the newer and more environmentally friendly vehicles.
@9SQ56QG4mos4MO
yes, but not too much to the extent where manufacterers and consumers are suffering economically.
@9RZM3V95mos5MO
Yes, but only if increasing costs for manufacturers are subsidised, and the availability of diesel vehicles is not compromised.
@9RKZCVB5mos5MO
Yes, but only if costs are subsidised, and the availability of diesel vehicles is not compromised.
@9QS3S9L6mos6MO
Yes, if manufacturing costs are subsidised by the government, and if the availability of diesel vehicles is not compromised or reduced.
@9PDPBQY7mos7MO
Yes, as long as manufacturing costs are subsidised and the availability of diesel vehicles is not reduced.
Yes, but only with government subsidies to prevent high costs, and no government intervention in the availability of diesel vehicles.
@9TQ5HHD4mos4MO
Yes, as long as costs for manufacturers are subsidised, and the availability of diesel vehicles is not reduced.
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.