Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
No, but also improve our ability to screen out potential terrorists
Place these immigrants in off-shore detention facilities (but they actually need to be comfortable and not violate basic rights) and screen them accordingly. The process needs to be streamlined for maximum of 6 - 12 months.
@9ZR2LN54 days4D
No, they should be instantly detained and deported
@9ZPK3386 days6D
Yes, but also improve the government’s ability to screen out potential terrorists
Off shore processing with a main objective of humanity
@9QS3S9L5mos5MO
Yes, but there should be no racist generalisations about such people from high-risk countries in the public image.
@9QPQ5D25mos5MO
Yes, unless they can prove to ASIO that they have no links with terrorism or organised crime
@9PSLVTY5mos5MO
Yes, but there should be no racist generalisations on people of such countries.
@9PDPBQY5mos5MO
Yes, but there should be no racist generalisations about people from that country.
@9M8CT847mos7MO
If the immigrants from the country are at a specific higher risk to our country, then yes, you can ban them. If not, then you should not ban them.
@9KX5LSK9mos9MO
Security and background check them and if they are safe then no if not then yes
No but put into a safe and secure area before known as potential terrorists
@9K8TZN2New Liberal9mos9MO
How many more of these questions will be Americanized - I sure with Australia
@9JQYNY910mos10MO
Make sure we raise security from high risk countries and have firm checks from them to make sure it’s safe for them to come here
It would be hard to determine if they have links to terrorism but maybe the government should invest in some ways to monitor those family/people.
Yes, but only if they went through a background check for criminal history.
@9J2PTNS11mos11MO
Immigration should be stopped altogether until we solve the current housing crisis.
@9HS75FK11mos11MO
No, unless the migrant was a member of a known terrorist group.
@9HQKNW611mos11MO
No, these immigrants may be fleeing from potentially life-threatening situations
@9GH8LWL1yr1Y
No but only if they are given a strong security check and background check
@9G78CRT1yr1Y
No only if they get a strong background check and the police should seek out the people from the high risk country to see if there terrorists or not
@9WKK2TM1mo1MO
No but they need to thoroughly screen before accepting even if it means delaying their arrival
@9W9Q2D81mo1MO
No, but monitor immigrants to make sure they are not a hazard.
@9W7R255One Nation1mo1MO
People seeking asylum should be allowed to enter the country, with strict border force security to screen for weapons and other indicators of terrorism.
@9VPFB8Y2mos2MO
No, just have more restrictions on them, like, a parol or smth.
No, but also improve our ability to screen out terrorists
@9TQ5HHD2mos2MO
Yes, I understand what countries do for their national security purposes, but in this regard, there should be no racist generalisations about such people.
@9TKSTH82mos2MO
Only men from these countries should be banned, not women a children.
@9T6575J3mos3MO
No, but still improve our ability to screen out terrorists
@9SDNP5T3mos3MO
No, but also invest in improving our ability to screen out potential terrorists
No, but the government should still improve its ability to screen out potential terrorists
@9S7QD4D3mos3MO
No, but still improve the government’s ability to screen out potential terrorists
@9S2XYG54mos4MO
No, but also improve the governments ability to screen out potential terrorists
@9RZM3V94mos4MO
Yes, but there should be no racist generalisations.
@9RWJMDC4mos4MO
No, but improve the government’s ability to screen out potential terrorists
@9RKZCVB4mos4MO
Yes, I understand what countries do to protect national security, but there should be no racist generalisations about any such people.
@9M53VJK7mos7MO
yes but provide safety, that be it either in out country or a close and safe country like papua new guinea
No, but everyone entering the country should have proof of a clean criminal record and pass a psych evaluation
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@9VTGLSJ2mos2MO
We don't need to erode out nation with trojans
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
