Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

100 Replies

 @8RGGV6RLiberalanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes but with the same level of science based critique of negative effects as smoking and alcohol receives so that individuals can make informed choices

 @8J9J5JRanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, legalize tax and regulate but add instead of it being punitive criminal problem, treat as a health problem and refer to health services - see Portugal model

 @932YHHFanswered…3yrs3Y

 @934YKH2answered…3yrs3Y

Only for medical use, only as an oil or non smoking form, only with the hallucinogens removed

 @9346PS9answered…3yrs3Y

I think all drug use should be looked down upon, but that is for communities at large to handle. It should be legalised and possibly even taxed, but the negative effects (even as a painkiller) should be considered by others before use.

 @932FV4Vanswered…3yrs3Y

De-criminalise all drugs and provide education, rehabilitation and counselling services etc (like successful European countries) tailored to the severity and nature of drug I.e marijuana vs. hard drugs

 @932F65Kanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, it already is in Canberra, why nit the rest of the country with the same rules and penalties.

 @932D2ZRGreenanswered…3yrs3Y

 @92YR928Liberalanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes but the smoke cannot affect members of the public or minors in a household.

 @92X8DQHanswered…3yrs3Y

 @92WGCY9answered…3yrs3Y

 @92TRHJRanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, it should be legalised, taxed and regulated along with having prisoners released that are serving time solely for marijuana use.

 @92SBTCFanswered…3yrs3Y

 @92P9Y4LGreenanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes. But only if there are carbon offset programs to reduce the negative environmental effects of the cannabis industry.

 @92D4TL9answered…3yrs3Y

I am a health care worker and i know Marijuana helps peoples pain and gives them peace. It is a natural plant and the law gets in the way of Human rights. People are forced to take pharma products with choice .

 @92C6QTZGreenanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but increased rehabilitation programs need to be made available to help those who will develop addiction

 @927463Vanswered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZYXS49answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but with the same limitations as alcohol, ie. no usage whilst operating vehicles, etc.

 @8ZTB77HLiberalanswered…3yrs3Y

No, but for medical usage. Marijuana crimes should also only be enforced when a crime is evident.

 @8ZRK46SLiberalanswered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZPD8MJGreenanswered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZLHWSVGreenanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but with a legal age limit set by the age when brain development is completed (age 25-28) to reduce mental health harms

 @8ZJ3FCDGreenanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only on private property. I don’t consent to second hand smoking.

 @8ZF9R24answered…3yrs3Y

 @8Z8XQBXanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes although I believe that the results of legalisation should be observed for a while and after a final decision should be made.

 @8Z46QFTIndependentanswered…3yrs3Y

No, but personal possession should be decriminalised and instead be treated as a health issue. Mandatory rehab and supervision. And previous offenders should be released

 @8YZC6VCanswered…3yrs3Y

 @8YHBFS6Greenanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes. And use the money currently spend on court and jails for educational programs.

 @8YH7QWCanswered…3yrs3Y

no, but marijunana use should be decriminalised and allowed for medical use

 @8XS3YXSDemocratic Labouranswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, regulate, tax and use it for medical use, but have ways to help people with the drug and any negative effects.

 @8W89D76Liberalanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but enforce new laws prohibiting the abuse of the drug at certain age.

 @8W2HZ7Wanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and re-evaluate the innocence of any persons currently serving time for previous use of marijuana

 @8VKFLR2Liberalanswered…3yrs3Y

Not that I would do marijuana but in a way, yes. But I wouldn’t recommend having an addiction to marijuana therefore like alcohol, it can ruin the lives of the many people who have those habits.

 @9XSSRF5answered…3wks3W

No, the effects of using marijuana and especially secondhand smoke from recreational marijuana can be dangerous

 @9W7CP6KGreenanswered…1mo1MO

Only if you’re under the age of 18, are healthy, don’t use it too regularly, have regular checkups, aren’t addicted or have prior problems with drugs or alcohol, aren’t selling it illegally, don’t become aggressive or paranoid, or if it’s been recommended by a doctor.

 @9VYX78Ranswered…1mo1MO

Yes, for medical purposes and it should be decriminalised rather then legalised for users who are recreationally using.

 @9SBFDT7answered…3mos3MO

yes, legalise it and also tax and regulate marijuana similar to how cigarettes are taxed and immediately release anyone serving time solely based on cannabis offences

 @9PQ394HLaboranswered…5mos5MO

Yes, but institute and increase funding on the proper programs that can aid in recovering from drug use.

 @9NP8VY3Laboranswered…6mos6MO

Creating special licenses for marijuana use for people 18 years+ and create both mental and physical tests to dictate whether or not they should be allowed to use it.

 @9N9NYLWanswered…6mos6MO

No, however decriminalise cannabis but have a proper debate into whether cannabis should be legalised

 @9K2YBC8Liberalanswered…9mos9MO

i think that it should only be taken for people who take it for health reasons or destress especially if that need it

 @92D4YC9Laboranswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only medicinal use in regulated dosages and proven treatments, no smoking, edibles etc

 @8YXQ8B8Independentanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and those incarcerated for Marijuana related offences should immediately be released

 @8TS8Z9DIndependentanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only for medical use. Even then, it shouldn't be Marijuana (the plant), but cannabis oil with all the addictive substance removed. Legalising it for medical research would be beneficial though.

 @9MBWCGLGreenanswered…7mos7MO

For medicinal purposes yes, rehabilitation should be provided for those who do not meet the criteria

 @9L49HSCLiberalanswered…8mos8MO

I don't really mind it. As long as it's handled correctly, it could be beneficial for our economy. However, strict regulations are necessary.

 @9KD5WJVLaboranswered…9mos9MO

if it has been proven or if there is investigations that shows it is safe... then yes but if the science contradicts and says its dangerous then it should stay illegal.

 @9K9VF63Labor answered…9mos9MO

Yes if it can be taxed and CONTROLLED so it does not end in chaos Also release anyone who is serving time for Marijuana crimes

 @9G35LNXanswered…1yr1Y

It should be legal but due to the studies shown, vaping was formally used to reduce a persons addiction to smoking however that turned out to be a problem that we now face.

 @9F8DGD8Liberalanswered…1yr1Y

recreational cones are fine, but if someone does something under the influence they should be punished.

 @9JCXXLZGreenanswered…10mos10MO

Depends on what it's used for (Yes for chronic medical conditions like epilepsy. Don't let mentally ill people have access if it gives way to the risk of them getting violent.

 @9GLB6M7answered…1yr1Y

No there should still be a sentance depending on how bad it is but there should be help overcoming addiction and it should also be legal for medical use

 @9GCQG3Zanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, for the purpose of helping addicts quit so that they don’t commit crimes in order access weed. This would require counselling services used in parallel.

 @9G65YN6answered…1yr1Y

Yes, legalise, tax and regulate the marijuana industry, as well as immediately releasing anyone serving time solely for drug offences regarding marijuana.

 @9DF8W7CGreenanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, but increase social support to reduce impacts on individuals and the community

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...