Should the government increase spending on public transportation?

Yes, and provide more free public transportation, but only only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions.

Yes, and provide more free public transportation and spend more towards environmentally friendly solutions

No spending at all. Who actually does pay?

Satisfied with current

Luke needs the bus

Yes, more on green and cheaper or even free public transport

Spending should be proportionate to need

Yes, provide more free public transportation and make the spending go towards environmentally friendly solutions

Cheaper public transport and better the infrastucture

No, but there should be encouragement for people to utilise public transportation more

Free public transport

Yes, only if spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions, and provide more free public transport

Yes but only to add more runs so that late finishing workers don’t have to sleep on the platform

Yes, investment in regional mass transit such as trains is needed.

No, just make it free to travel

Yes, and ensure it is effectively and affordable servicing growth corridors and is not run as a profit generator.

Public transport should be more affordable

Yes but for rural towns not cities, rural towns get nothing right now compared to the billion dollar rebuilds that the cities get for stupid things

Make transportation here

No. We need to be smarter in creating free or cheap public transport. Look to other countries for their transport structure

This should be State Gov run and funded not federal

Passenger Train to regional areas

yes, however the spending must go toward the safety of passengers

No we should provide more support towards the developing electric car industry and infrastructure

should include greater spend in regional areas on public transport

Yes, however they should review how much money they waste on projects

Money should be spent on train and tram lines rather than more buses

Yes, only if the spending contributes to environmental health, and there is free (or cheaper) public transportation

Yes, but leave the good panels and the nice tags and throws

Should be increased as funding becomes available.

Yes, it's so important for independence for those in precarious work (casual etc). Ideally must have environmental goals too.

No, make a shift towards clean energy transport.

I rather see money be spent on reviewing the effectiveness of current transport and make sure the system functions into the future. Public transport might naturally become less costly with flexible work and self driving technology and ai to flex up and down service needs.

Only for security

Yes and it should all go toward more accessible public transport and suitable town planning, and environmentally friendly public transport

Yes and provide more free public transportation and environmentally friendly

Yes but in regional areas. Metro has enough.

Look at the efficiency of the current spending first

Yes and use it to add more disability friendly options

Make public transport for accessible in the rural areas

The current allocation should be used towards effective public transport that works towards a plan for years to come

Spend more in rural or smaller country areas

Yes, for security purposes.

Satisfy needs of aging population & safety of shift workers

No, at the current rate of spending public transportation should make it free

Yes, if providing more environmentally friendly solutions and and free public transportation or reduced transportation fee costings

No, Public Transport should be a state issue not a federal one

We have bigger issues that transport to deal with. vLike the WOKE outbursts and sneaky teaching to our children who are being confused about their identity

Only if it can be proven to be used efficiently