Genetic engineering involves modifying the DNA of organisms to prevent or treat diseases. Proponents argue that it could lead to breakthroughs in curing genetic disorders and improving public health. Opponents argue that it raises ethical concerns and potential risks of unintended consequences.
@ISIDEWITH11mos11MO
@B4MFQ9J2wks2W
Yes with solid boundaries in place and ban gain of function to enhance adverse effects and f diseases
@9PSXSTR10mos10MO
The government should be looking into more alternative practises to help one’s health and not look at everyone as short term healing rather then long term
@9PSM8ZL10mos10MO
More research needs to be done before we can decide
@B2QDW8W3mos3MO
Yes, as long as there is full transparency of the research and how it has it's benefits & cons, as well as there is peer review studies to also back up the science behind said research in regards to this.
@9WTMTL26mos6MO
Yes, with conditions for research within ethical borders and does not go into practical testing prior to all potential ethical and safety concerns being checked
@9W3R3DVAnimal Justice6mos6MO
Only for diseases and genetic disorders that severely affect a person’s physical and mental wellbeing
@9QSSLD910mos10MO
Depending on when they stop what are there ethical barriers?
@9PTY5LJ10mos10MO
Yes, but only for serious and more common diseases
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@9QYCGD39mos9MO
They should ban such development. It is clearly dangerous
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@B4VLVNYKatter’s Australian1 day1D
Maybe, but it would have to be with complete transparency, guidelines and regulations. Also, no one should ever be forced to participate or take these things!
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.