Try the political quiz

36.8k Replies

@62L2G6NGreenfrom Western Australia  answered…1yr

@632TS9RGreenfrom Victoria  answered…1yr

@62HTVFYLiberal Democratfrom Victoria  answered…1yr

Duel decision,unless in cases of rape,incest or danger to the mother or child or with written consent of both mother and father to have an abortion within 3 months.Legally it should be both parents decision.If father wants an abortion and mother doesn't he should not be held financially responsible for the child and vice versa if the father does want the child and the mother doesn't.

@62N5ZRDDemocratic Labourfrom Victoria  answered…1yr

Nothing to do with Church OR State - Leave it out of the Political Arena

@5WYCRHFLiberalfrom Western Australia  answered…1yr

Pro-life, with the waiver that if a woman's life is at risk and at least two doctors agree she is, then an abortion should be allowed. In general though, abortions should be discouraged, and neither women or men should be allowed to insist on an abortion for the woman in question, nor she herself, if neither child or woman is in any physical danger.

@9WJ4WJCReason answered…4mos

Pro-life, but I don't think the Government should ban abortion. The Government should provide incentives to not abort (provide assistance to mothers that chose to keep the child or put it up for adoption, tax breaks, etc.), but not outright ban it.

@9V46YQNGreen answered…8mos

I am unable to answer this question due to not ever having been in a situation like this, but if I were. I would lean towards pro life. (depending on life circumstances).

@9TSCGJTGreen answered…9mos

if the biological parents don't want the child, they should try and move the baby in to a body that is infertile but has the capability to grow the embryo and they can rise the baby as their own?? instead of killing the child and leaving parents who cant have kids of their own to never have the experience of having a child

@9THG2DWNick Xenophon Team answered…9mos

Pro Choice, I don't agree with it but agree that each situation is circumstantial and the government has no right to ban it

@9TDV96WAnimal Justice answered…9mos

Pro-choice but both parents must agree and after 5 months it should be illegal

no because it is a part of the environment so then if they love the environment then its ok but if they don't its wrong

@9JD8NK8Labor answered…1yr

Pro- choice but an after the first three months. Education should also be prioritised to help reduce numbers.

@9JCG9DTNationals answered…1yr

I would say that I am pro-life, however in cases of rape, incest, danger to the mother/child or in circumstances where the parent is not going to be able to provide a safe, secure upbringing to the child due to financial circumstances etc - abortion should be allowed.

@9HMB27BNationals answered…1yr

Pro life but allow for consideration in instances of rape or danger to an individual whilst additionally increasing a focus on and access to contraception and sex education to avoid unwanted pregnancies. Additionally, seek greater encouragement for adoption in cases where households are unable to raise a child safely or effectively

@9H8ZDH3Labor answered…1yr

okay being pregnant young is hard, but if you didnt use protection and you knew the risks killing the baby is unfair and selfish. plus not many women have the opportunity that you have .

the only reasons i think an abortion should be allowed is if you got pregnant because of, rape, drugged, forced, sexual harassment, manipulation, ( condoms broke or the pill or rod didnt work ).

@9H8T2K6Animal Justice answered…1yr

Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child. As well as providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

@9G6XJL5Justice answered…1yr

It's the mothers choice of what she wants, not mine or anyone else who is carrying a child

@9S55BCPScience answered…11mos

I am a male and only woman should have an opinion on this. Men don't get to tell women what they should do.

@9MBKD79Nationals answered…1yr

I agree with abortion only if the men get a say, its unfair for the woman to make the decision on abortion or not but then the man has to cover the financial side of things

@9LS426COne Nation answered…1yr

Abortion is murder and should be legislated as such. If the life of the mother is in the balance then a court exemption should be applied for. Additional education and adoption services made available. Too many infertile couples and no options to adopt in this country.

@9KNY4GXReason answered…1yr

Pro-choice, but only allowed upto the first 4 weeks, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

@9Z6KP6VIndependent answered…3wks

I am pro choice and providing more sex education and birth control but an abortion should not be legal after 3 months unless medically necessary

@9Z5Q2XXOne Nation answered…4wks

Pro-life, but allow cases of danger to the mother or child and disabilities

Pro Choice, and forceful if you are on welfare and already had 1 child on welfare. The people shouldn't be responsible to pay for irresponsible people.

@9YNGTRGLiberal Democrat answered…2mos

pro choice, but not in third trimester unless medical emergency (since 5-6 months is plenty of time do decide if you want to have it or not)...

@9XT8DQHLabor answered…3mos

Pro life but don’t think abortion should be criminalised. We should instead focus on supporting vulnerable women.

@9XR5WJ2Labor answered…3mos

Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child and I definitely think that it should be a choice (no right to ban)

@9XR5V4BIndependent answered…3mos

Pro-choice, I may not agree but the government has no right to ban it and we should be provided with birth control, sex education and more social services to help reduce number of abortions.

@9XJKM9JIndependent answered…3mos

Implement a Eugenics program that controls which babies are created to begin with

@9X2DD5NIndependent answered…4mos

Definitely for case of rape etc but not free enough to use as birth control back up

@9WSLGFGLiberal answered…4mos

although morally no, legally it should be allowed up to three months. After the first three months a genuine medical reason is required

@9WRQX24Green answered…4mos

It depends if a fetus is scientifically proven to be a person. If it’s proven to not be a person, then the decision should the mother’s choice. Mother’s should immediately be allowed to have an abortion in cases of rape, incest, and danger to the mother or child.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart...