Full accessibility ensures that public transportation accommodates people with disabilities by providing necessary facilities and services. Proponents argue that it ensures equal access, promotes independence for people with disabilities, and complies with disability rights. Opponents argue that it can be costly to implement and maintain and may require significant modifications to existing systems.
It depends on circumstance and only do when viable to implement.
@9WXVR3Z3mos3MO
No. But suitable alternatives should be available for those with disabilities
@9WBCNY83mos3MO
No, but must provide alternative accessible public transportation to those that need them
@B2CRG6DOne Nation3hrs3H
No. Australia is already one of the best. Only include this for new infrastructure
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
