Vaping refers to using electronic cigarettes that deliver nicotine through vapor, while junk food includes high-calorie, low-nutrition foods like candy, chips, and sugary drinks. Both are linked to various health issues, especially among young people. Proponents argue that banning promotion helps protect the health of young people, reduces the risk of developing lifelong unhealthy habits, and decreases public health costs. Opponents argue that such bans infringe on commercial free speech, limit consumer choice, and that education and parental guidance are more effective ways to promote healthy lifestyles.
@9SNXKCZ1mo1MO
The government already regulates the promotion of such products therefore, i believe the government should continue doing so and potentially enforce stricter standards.
@9S7LL4XIndependent1mo1MO
The government shouldn't ban these products however there should be an increased tax rate on the items which is spent on health care and the development and accessibility of healthier lifestyle products
@9S6SXD61mo1MO
No, people will do what they do without mentality change and legal buying will turn into illegal buying and more criminal activity.
@9RXFJKM2mos2MO
depends on which product should be banned. Unsafe products should be, but junk food should not be due to it being a choice to eat it
@9PJ47Z63mos3MO
i would say that a vape is more addicting than junk food nowadays, ban the vape, it’s mainly up to the parents though
@9NZZXQ34mos4MO
Certain things like vaping should be regulated, but junk food should be not - above all however, the government should work to advocate healthy lifestyles for all.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
