Expanding bike lanes and bike-sharing programs encourages cycling as a sustainable and healthy mode of transportation. Proponents argue that it reduces traffic congestion, lowers emissions, and promotes a healthier lifestyle. Opponents argue that it can be costly, may take away road space from vehicles, and might not be widely used.
Yes, provided it does not cause unnecessary disruption.
@B22G8ZN2wks2W
Depends on if it’ll be used and how much it costs.
Yes, provided they do not compromise the safety or experience of other road users.
@9WNF6TBOne Nation2mos2MO
This would be useful in built up areas such as cities.
@9WD555W2mos2MO
Yes, as long as they do not impact current roads and cities.
@9TND4QC3mos3MO
Government need to encourage bicycles but they must also hold all riders responsible for all illegal activities.
@9SWQZYBDavid Pocock4mos4MO
No not until we address urban sprawl and build high density
@9MYFHGP7mos7MO
Sure, but my emphasis on public transport being free, efficient and guaranteed as a right along with all other basic human needs under a Universal Basic Needs Guarantee should be a given by now.
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.