Ride-sharing services, like Uber and Lyft, provide transportation options that can be subsidized to make them more affordable for low-income individuals. Proponents argue that it increases mobility for low-income individuals, reduces reliance on personal vehicles, and can reduce traffic congestion. Opponents argue that it is a misuse of public funds, may benefit ride-sharing companies more than individuals, and could discourage public transportation use.
No, but subsidize publicly owned transport instead for low income individuals.
No, the government should expand public transport networks and reduce public transport costs
@9QZJSXK7mos7MO
Concessions and/or assistance should be available for people who need it (eg disabled & elderly) without having to ride share as it's not always applicable.
@9QSVZXT7mos7MO
No, use any funds that may go to this for public transport
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.