Try the political quiz

16 Replies

 @9ZTPDVMLaboranswered…3mos3MO

No, but subsidize publicly owned transport instead for low income individuals.

 @9YLH5TZGreen answered…3mos3MO

No, the government should expand public transport networks and reduce public transport costs

 @9QZJSXKanswered…7mos7MO

Concessions and/or assistance should be available for people who need it (eg disabled & elderly) without having to ride share as it's not always applicable.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

What might be some unintended consequences of making ride-sharing cheaper for low-income individuals?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Do you feel that increased reliance on ride-sharing services could weaken interest in improving public transportation systems?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

If you had a choice between subsidized rides in an Uber or a stronger bus and train system, which would you choose and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How would affordable ride-sharing impact traffic congestion and your experience commuting during busy times?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Do you think supporting services like Uber and Lyft with public subsidies would help or harm the environment in the long run?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Should cities prioritize convenience for individuals, like ride-sharing, or broader access, like public transit?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How would affordable ride-sharing change your ability to move freely in your own city?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Do you think public money should be used to support services like Uber and Lyft, or is it better spent on public transit improvements?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How would easier access to ride-sharing affect the daily life of someone without a vehicle?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

If ride-sharing became cheaper for everyone, do you think it would make owning a car less important?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...