This considers the use of AI algorithms to assist in making decisions such as sentencing, parole, and law enforcement. Proponents argue that it can improve efficiency and reduce human biases. Opponents argue that it may perpetuate existing biases and lacks accountability.
AI should be used to provide guidance / opinions / quantitative evidence and reasoning
@9VX8DKN2mos2MO
It should be used as a tool to provide outlines for decisions for and against convictions not as the final deciding factor
@9TQPHWX3mos3MO
The repairs should don't trust drastically in lives as said government feedback admins
@9SWQZYBDavid Pocock4mos4MO
No, not within sentencing as this decision requires human legal judgement
No, there should always be human input and decision making
@9RZM3V94mos4MO
Yes, as long as it does not perpetuate existing biases and is accountable.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
