This considers the use of AI algorithms to assist in making decisions such as sentencing, parole, and law enforcement. Proponents argue that it can improve efficiency and reduce human biases. Opponents argue that it may perpetuate existing biases and lacks accountability.
@B4CDZ73 3wks3W
Yes, but only as a supplementary recommendation/summary, ultimately it should still be primarily decided humanely.
@B44DXFK1mo1MO
Yes, but only in cases where the majority of evidence is numerical in nature and requires thorough mathematical analysis.
@B3J5Y6X 2mos2MO
Only as an aid to assist with no decision making power.
@B33P8JX2mos2MO
To make the final decision? No. That should be a board of “judges” not just one either. To aid the decision? Maybe.
@B2V2C393mos3MO
No, AI should not be used in any legal proceedings
@9TQPHWX7mos7MO
The repairs should don't trust drastically in lives as said government feedback admins
AI should be used to provide guidance / opinions / quantitative evidence and reasoning
@9VX8DKN6mos6MO
It should be used as a tool to provide outlines for decisions for and against convictions not as the final deciding factor
@9SWQZYBDavid Pocock8mos8MO
No, not within sentencing as this decision requires human legal judgement
No, there should always be human input and decision making
@9RZM3V99mos9MO
Yes, as long as it does not perpetuate existing biases and is accountable.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
