Should the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) raise interest rates to prevent a housing bubble?
In 2015, Treasury Secretary John Fraser warned that Australia’s largest cities were experiencing a housing bubble. He warned that the major cause of the bubble was low interest rates and access to easy financing for real estate loans. In 2016 the average price of a home in Sydney passed $1M. Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott argued that increasing house prices in cities were a sign that the economy was healthy.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Ideology:
State:
Federal Electorate:
Local Government Area:
State Electorate:
Postcode:
Suburb:
Will never be able to afford my own home either way so this question just depresses me.
@9ZL34PSIndependent2mos2MO
No, they should exponentially increase taxes on people with multiple investment properties and stop foreign investors from purchasing land or homes and reclaim purchased property or land.
@9WBLVWR 3mos3MO
No, the government should either subsidise more competition in the sectors with large market monopolies or regulate them
The RBA should raise interest rates to control inflation and maintain their target inflation, as per their mandate.
@9TKSK4D4mos4MO
Require more info on topic. But policies to help reduce artificial housing inflation is a positive to most Australians
@9S7LL4XIndependent5mos5MO
I don't believe raising interest rates will be enough to prevent a housing bubble. It is more likely to make housing unaffordable to the young and low income citizens
@9QS3S9L6mos6MO
Yes, but at a reasonable rate, and reverted back to the original rate once there is no clear threat of a housing bubble.
@9MF9GYX8mos8MO
They need to find the balance between not hurting low and middle income Australians with high rates while at the same time ensuring affordable housing
@9M8CT848mos8MO
No, but it depends on how much interest rates should be whether you are in cities, suburbs or rural areas based on the house or apartment.
@9M89ZGKIndependent8mos8MO
The government should use one of the many other tools to prevent a housing bubble instead of relying on the same one over and over to minimal effect
Yes, but only after a temporary rental cap, so renters aren't the ones forced to pay for the increase.
@9G3HCKJ1yr1Y
We should strive towards easier access to finance for loans, and create legislation to prevent housing pricing from reaching exorbitant levels
@9FCJJ5W1yr1Y
They should remain independent
@8J887WK4yrs4Y
Don’t know enough about it to decide
@HippopiJ2yrs2Y
No. Interest rate raises affects the working class, not investors. People should be limited to one investment property.
@HippopiJ2yrs2Y
Interest rate raises affects the working class, not investors. People should be limited to one investment property.
@9366QQ23yrs3Y
Only for investment properties
@935B2TP3yrs3Y
Depends on performance of economy
@934QN9F3yrs3Y
@933ZVXX3yrs3Y
No, except for investment properties
@933TLGH3yrs3Y
Rather than raising the 'cash rate' which increases the cost of all borrowing, the RBA should have the power to levy an extra charge (like a GST) on all lending for purposes which it wants to quell. Eg if house prices are raging in a certain city, but not elsewhere, increase the cost of borrowing for existing homes only in that a city. This makes new homes relatively less expensive, encouraging supply. This approach can be extended to all manner of borrowing where you want to target a specific sector and/or region
@933DL863yrs3Y
The housing bubble may exist, but increasing interest rates is not how you'll solve the issue. The issue is housing affordability
@932K8X63yrs3Y
Yes, but maintain it to a decent rate so the market don’t break
@932FW2M3yrs3Y
No, there are other ways to lower house prices such as purchasing limits for buyers
@932BBQS3yrs3Y
No, housing affordability should be addressed another way.
@92ZDPT63yrs3Y
rate fluctuations are designed and implemented to assist investors with large cash reserves ,it's a scam
@92WCH6D3yrs3Y
@92H2RGX3yrs3Y
No, but they should be raised for only those who own more than one property.
@92FS4CMLiberal Democrat3yrs3Y
Yes, but make exceptions for first home buyers.
@jazminehope3yrs3Y
@92C82CH3yrs3Y
RBA does not influence my interest rate on my loan. The banks do.
@92BXZQR3yrs3Y
To complicated to answer for the general public
No, land and housing should only be owned by and sold to Australian citizens.
@92BTLPW3yrs3Y
Yes, but only for those who are buying an investment property, not on people’s primary domestic dwelling
@92BKBGS3yrs3Y
Not a political question. The reserve bank should remain independent of government interference
@9295VYZ3yrs3Y
Yes but not on first home owners
@927ZNDV3yrs3Y
Your interest rate should increase exponentially with the number of houses you own
@9275BQV3yrs3Y
No, there should be other ways to reduce housing prices than further isolating young FHB.
The housing bubble must be fixed by actively decreasing the cost of living and housing by offering public options.
@Cooney69123yrs3Y
No, this has the potential to damage new home owners cash flow
How would I know. Leave that to the experts in that area
It already exists. Too late
They should raise interest rates for private savings and create far more public housing and affordable, stop negative gearing or property only for investment purposes. Housing should be a human right. There should be reasonable restrictions on owning a second dwelling e.g. for children, education or work commitments, but not just as holiday accommodation and left empty for 11 months a year.
I don’t think it as simple a question to distill down to rates alone.
@8ZPY7M53yrs3Y
We should stop allowing the foreign purchase of property.
@8ZPBFDL3yrs3Y
Force the bubble and then burst it, the housing market is too far gone
It's far too late now to prevent a housing bubble. They should have acted earlier and the federal govt should have removed the capital gains tax exemption on houses over a calculated and agreed amount.
@8Z34MSMIndependent3yrs3Y
The RBA are the 'experts', it's not up to me.
@8YRDTC4Independent3yrs3Y
This is a dumb question as the RBA is independent and will act irrelevant of the federal government's stance on interest rates
Yes, but only for the cities where this is an issue - interest rate based on postcode.
The reserve bank should be abolished.
No, we're in a recession.
@8WSB7MN3yrs3Y
Generally speaking yes, but because of Covid and the impact this would have on people who cant work, no
@8WHJL8HIndependent3yrs3Y
No bailouts, Let it fail
@Yods083yrs3Y
No. I think the current lending will help Manage the sector. The horse has already bolted with the Chinese investments several years ago increasing the house prices. The prices now are so far out of our children’s reach. Too late guys.
@8VZKN983yrs3Y
No, only if the economy requires it.
No, regulate the banks, don't punish the home-buyers
Maybe, if this is included in the inflation statistic (which it currently isn’t)
@8TD3L4BIndependent4yrs4Y
No, if house prices are the only motivating factor.
@joyceaquilinaLiberal4yrs4Y
Housing should be affordable for All. Low interest rates are good... but not if your mortgage lasts to the end off your paid work years or your lifetime. Houses have exceeded their true worth.
I dont really know about this
The RBA should carry on doing what it's doing indepedently based on its macroeconomic goals/targets.
No, but raise them sooner than they are saying.
@8SM6M934yrs4Y
Increase Capital Gains tax instead, along with other tax reform
@8SK7TBWOne Nation4yrs4Y
No, I dont believe raising interest will have a huge effect. Instead I think the government should offer more subsidies and benefits for Australian citizens and raise a tax against foreign investors.
All usury should be outlawed.
@8RJNF2Q4yrs4Y
That should be up to the bank
@8QVDMB44yrs4Y
No. The Reserve Bank of Australia should never interfere with interests rates.
@8NX7LXP4yrs4Y
Yes but apply these interest rate increases only to Area's where the bubble is presenting itself this will promote investment in other areas
@8G6435D4yrs4Y
There are too many other factors that should be considered. Beyond my competence to decide
@8FL8DQF4yrs4Y
Yes, but not dramatically
@8D2H6GM4yrs4Y
What does this have to do with housing? Higher interest rates means more to pay back. Why would you wanna pay more for a house? However, if it’s the bank giving you back interest then, yeah whatever.
Interest Rates should reflect econonmic health and spending and should not be used to control the property market. If property is unaffordable, then rent also rises. Shelter is a basic human right and should not be tampered with.
@98Q82ZJ2yrs2Y
No, Government should instead remove negative gearing for rental properties and cap the amount of properties one can own.
@98572Z62yrs2Y
Too late,housing bubble is here
@984C83N2yrs2Y
Limit houses to one per person
@97ZGKT92yrs2Y
I hope the bubble bursts
@96TCBH72yrs2Y
Only for investment propery
@92YL68N3yrs3Y
Banks should raise interest rates for high income earners purchasing investment properties
@92JX7Z23yrs3Y
The bubble is there already?
@92Z9R5Q3yrs3Y
No, Australians are struggling already with COVID and other employment issues
@92YFNP23yrs3Y
Don’t know enough Economics to have an informed opinion
@92XSKBH3yrs3Y
Interest rate need to remain neutral of government interference.
@92X8DQH3yrs3Y
No they should lower interest rates and cap them for first home buyers and not let immigrants buy
@92X8DQH3yrs3Y
they should lower interest rates and cap them for first home buyers and not let immigrants buy
@92WG8RX3yrs3Y
No, the housing bubble could be prevented by reducing negative-gearing incentives, stopping or limiting foreign investment of housing and reducing other incentives for investment properties.
@92WHX9C3yrs3Y
Should never have allowed it in the first place
@92VKFYH3yrs3Y
Irrelevant to me as I will never get a loan. Or a house.
@9CFCXTW2yrs2Y
Home loans on your first home should be set on a low interest rate for the length of your loan like my parents in the 50-70… this allows families to budget properly.. should be a limit to cost of home and obviously not for investment or negatively geared properties.. given problems are caused more from company inc. Banks huge profits and huge tax minimisation
No, as interest rate hikes only lead to worse housing bubbles and it's already too expensive for mortgages and rent as it is
@9BRDZR52yrs2Y
Initially yes. Then stop
@9B5G37C2yrs2Y
no, this will only benefit banks and will not do much but ruin small business and families. a competent government could do this in other ways
@962KL2Y2yrs2Y
No, it is better to buy up stock and hold it, and then refurbish it and release back on to the market when more housing is needed, at maximum 10% discount to prevent too high a loss for the government
@99YNCBH2yrs2Y
Inflation and the housing market should not be controlled and fuelled through the banks, this is where the government should be stepping in to control issues that are pose a national security.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.