Try the political quiz
+

Reply

 @5D4BZJSanswered…4yrs4Y

 @582LC97Laborfrom New South Wales  answered…4yrs4Y

Not until a generally accepted model is produced to make sure we do not leave open the possibility of a Trump type anomaly

 @4W35W4NGreenfrom Victoria  answered…4yrs4Y

 @4W36N2Dfrom New South Wales  answered…4yrs4Y

 @4VFYXJ6Nationalsfrom South Australia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @4ZVRSJMLiberalfrom Victoria  answered…4yrs4Y

Not ready still immature population to deal with an Republic,besides all states should be dissolved, as well as all amateur councils .Creation of one national government with say 50 regional councils run by professionals rather than pathetic states having petty fights and crummy councils out of control.
In fact Councils do not exist under the Constitution.

 @4ZRTXPTfrom Western Australia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, the days of empire are over, treat the commonwealth countries as equal trading partners, we don't need a Ruler.

 @4Z92XDKGreenfrom Queensland  answered…4yrs4Y

It should be considered in the best interest of Australia after the UK's exit from the European Union, however no firm decision should be made until we are sure if there will be any negative effects on Australia either way.

 @8RTW5F8answered…4yrs4Y

No. The Monarchy is only currently symbolic and removing won't change anything.

 @8WTY8SSanswered…3yrs3Y

 @B4TV9V4 answered…3 days3D

I don't believe currently it is beneficial with the current world conflicts to invoke big change however this is something Australia should work towards for true independence

 @B4TQW97answered…3 days3D

Neither. Ask the Indigenous Australians, the original owners of this land. But if we were to become a republic, do not let us sink to the standards of the United States of America.

 @B4JZG7DIndependentanswered…2wks2W

Either one but regardless We need to revisit/look at our alliances and agreements with other countries and ensure they align with the beliefs and views of the majority of Australian Public.

 @B4J4HLTanswered…2wks2W

If we break from the monarchy I would like to see us retain our governmental structure with parliament etc

 @9F6BTFWanswered…2yrs2Y

Honestly, I think that Australia should remain apart of the Commonwealth but remove the Monarchy as a figure head and replace it with a President position

 @9DT99G5answered…2yrs2Y

 @8ZL3QVKanswered…3yrs3Y

Nope, nobody in Australian Parliament House is even responsible enough to lead our country as republic. Monarchy all the way!

 @8XFFYYVanswered…3yrs3Y

 @B4CBKPWanswered…3wks3W

Yes, But only as a constitutional republic with a bill of rights to safeguard its citizens and that the president is determined by the vote of the people and not the party

 @B4BSKMWanswered…3wks3W

That would be an experiment which could be bad, as we don’t have a bill of rights for all Australians and could give governments more draconian powers

 @B4BRYLTanswered…3wks3W

We should remain part of the Commonwealth, and maintain our Westminster parliamentary system. However, we deserve an Australian head of government.

 @B4BR4LHanswered…3wks3W

I think that the Commonwealth benefits Australia in some ways and hinders it in others. It it too complex to decide reflexively.

 @B4B7VTCanswered…4wks4W

Yes but keep a strong Constitution in place and have an independent "Answer too" board that consists of Senate members that are not from the currently ruling party(s).

 @B45K97SLaboranswered…1mo1MO

Australia should foster a stronger and open union between Australia United Kingdom Canada and New Zealand

 @B434MGFfrom Guam  answered…1mo1MO

The monarchy should hold no power. They're glorified tourist attractions. But I dont think they should be defunded either. They bring in a lot of revenue for the UK and wherever they visit.

 @B42FX9Xanswered…1mo1MO

If it costs any amount of money to end the monarchy then leave as is, we don’t have the money and it’s not a priority

 @B3XT7SLJacquie Lambie Networkanswered…1mo1MO

Not until we have trustworthy politicians and political parties that are held accountable for lying to get elected

 @B3TZ7VFanswered…1mo1MO

No, this could possibly ruin an already functioning democratic system, and it provides a boon in relations to the Commonwealth and the UK.

 @B3TRRHJLaboranswered…1mo1MO

Should a competent model be created I would be in favour, but as of right now there is no reason to rid ourselves of the monarchy

 @B3RZ2JNanswered…2mos2MO

In principle yes but as a history student and knowing we're in a time of rising far right nationalism I don't think we should risk it right now. Also if we were to be a republic, head of state should be a coalition of first nations reps, no some white career politician

 @B3LVKJ9answered…2mos2MO

Yes, if it's less expensive than the monarchy, and if the head of state is as independent and removed as is current.

 @B3F9HZ5answered…2mos2MO

Yes, Once Australia starts increasing the price of its resources/appropriately taxes bigger corporations and stricter on large corporations tax loopholes then it can properly fund itself without the commonwealth

 @B39LZMHanswered…2mos2MO

Its conflicting as the monarchy allows us to keep relations with other countries, but it can be considered problematic due to its history.

 @B39JGHXanswered…2mos2MO

when we had the Queen yes but since charles took over and andrew following don't believe in GOD the a republic

 @B372N7Janswered…2mos2MO

Yes, but only if it is replaced by a board of representative leaders from Indigenous groups (one per state/territory) who are figureheads of Australian society.

 @B36VK33answered…2mos2MO

If the monarchy can be trusted to do right for us then stay for the British Republic but if not the separate

 @B34GHTKLaboranswered…2mos2MO

I belelive that the King should still be our representative but that we should not have to answer to him.

 @B32RT3FLaboranswered…2mos2MO

No. The current government system has worked well as it has and it could be jeopardized if we change it.

 @B32DK5Nanswered…2mos2MO

Whilst the monarchy is outdated and offers no value to the running economy, with the current state of the world being tied in with the commonwealth benefits strong allied ties with many other countries under the monarchy

 @B24STGSLaboranswered…4mos4MO

No. Westminster has worked well as it has and it could possibly compromise the government's effectiveness.

 @9ZR2LN5answered…5mos5MO

It should remain a monarchy and the monarchy should hold absolute power and any even remotely violent republican should be shot on sight

 @9W9N8RVGreenanswered…6mos6MO

Australia does not yet posess a maturity to act as a lawfull stanf alone member of the UN without bieng in a gang.

 @9VTF3XHanswered…7mos7MO

It is still important to acknowledge our ties to the United Kingdom, and therefore the Queen. Also, the Governor-General is important to our political system.

 @9VMNGVCanswered…7mos7MO

we should become our own country but still have very close ties with the commonwealth and still be considered part of the commonwealth

 @9VK64ZZLiberalfrom Guam  answered…7mos7MO

Australia should leave the monarchy but the Australian government should be purchased by the British government for 2 billion pounds

 @9V9T6DWOne Nationanswered…7mos7MO

Neither, i wouldn't care much if it stayed or didn't, it depends on how big the republican government is going to be

 @9V7FRWSCoalitionanswered…7mos7MO

We could become a republic, I don't really care whether we remain as a monarchy, but we do need a sense of independence.

 @9TCBLLJanswered…7mos7MO

We need a fully appointed leader. Someone who cares about the relevant issues. If that means stepping away from the crown, I see no issues.

 @9T6MJJDfrom Georgia  answered…8mos8MO

No, but remove the current royal family and establish a brand new royal family that works for the best interest of the Australian people.

 @9T4DKW5answered…8mos8MO

I don't particularly like the monarchy but they are the one thing keeping horrible prime ministers from becoming the next donald trump

 @9SMKKPVanswered…8mos8MO

No because it causes us to have less checks on the political system and their actions. It will let politicians have more individual power rather than power as a collective.

 @9SC6GPSanswered…8mos8MO

We should liberate every other country from their sick ways of living and introduce them to the ways of managed democracy.

 @9S2YYV9Laboranswered…9mos9MO

it could be possible but we need to have a good think about what exactly would happen if we did become a republic

 @9RZS2NCanswered…9mos9MO

Should Australia become a republic? It depends Would it assert national identity? Yes Could it cause political instability? Possibly Is the current system functioning well? Yes

 @9RPJ9JVLaboranswered…9mos9MO

The position of the Governor general should be weakened or even removed but the King should stay as the head of state

 @9RDR636answered…9mos9MO

Possibly in the near future or hold a public convention. Let the population decide. But, there is no disadvantage of being in a republic as we can still remain allies to those who we have affliations with.

 @9PSXSTRanswered…10mos10MO

Australia should end being within the monarchy and have a body that is based on indigenous living that will work with what infrastructure is now built. So people are less ignorant

 @9NBHF28from Georgia  answered…11mos11MO

No, but abolish the current monarchy and establish an Australian monarchy with a different royal dynasty.

 @9KMLLC8from Guam  answered…1yr1Y

Maybe, if the changes are only to the title of the head of state, and the powers of the head of state remain the same

 @9KB2VP6Laboranswered…1yr1Y

I think self-determination is important, however regional instability makes me think at the moment being part of the monarchy is a little safer in terms of deterring bad actors from aggression against Australia.

 @9K9YTK5Greenanswered…1yr1Y

It is a part of our history and we should grow with it. I’m not even sure if our connections with the monarchy effects us(Australians) in our daily lives

 @9K9XZWPGreenanswered…1yr1Y

I think at this point in time it does not affect Australia enough to use the money it would take to complete the process of becoming a republic.

 @9K7WXTWGreenanswered…1yr1Y

On the fence, it's both beneficial to us as a country yet important if Australia were to become independent.

 @9K6BX36answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but this should be done through a phased voting process. Vote for the type of Republic model and then a vote to the people with said model.

 @9JR2TMZLaboranswered…1yr1Y

Australia's participation in the monarchy provides stability, constitutional safeguards, and cultural ties, serving as a unifying symbol, but opinions on these benefits vary, with ongoing debates about the nation's constitutional future.

 @9JNPYL5answered…1yr1Y

Yes if charles stays on the throne with his mistress if No if William and Kate take over charles said her is the defender of the faiths he is supposed to be under GOD not mans religions false

 @9JLFXFQLaboranswered…1yr1Y

It's a very difficult and complicated situation, as we do depend on them quite a lot. So I believe we should wait till its the right time.

 @9JKG8RGanswered…1yr1Y

Find a new king. There are plenty of royals left in Europe, which I think would be more competent than our current king.

 @9JJDDG9Laboranswered…1yr1Y

Yes, we should be a republic however not at this point in time as it costs to much money and is currently unnessesary

 @9J46KB2Greenanswered…1yr1Y

Depends how the new system works (specifically as a democracy). It should wait until there’s proof that it’s effective.

 @9992HTR  from GU  answered…1yr1Y

No, I am in favor of the monarchy in general, however I support taxing them more harshly, and reducing the power of the monarch to a ceremonial position.

 @9GPV99Rfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

No I think we keep moving forward on more important issues like bring aboriginal culture into main stream Australian house holds and schools

 @9GGL9B6answered…1yr1Y

No because the ties with britain may be broken if gone about the wrong way, but yes because moving forwards.

 @9FVS3ZQGreenanswered…2yrs2Y

It really depends on the international situation, as of now, there is no real need to end the monarchy but we may need to one day as we grow a stronger identity and become less reliant on our connections to the commonwealth.

 @9FCVNM8One Nationanswered…2yrs2Y

As long as the monarchy doesn't hurt Australia's democratic system then it should stay for the cultural ties to England

 @9DCBFXVLiberalanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but so long as it doesn't have any long lasting effects to our economy.

 @9DBMBYFLiberalanswered…2yrs2Y

 @9D66WW9answered…2yrs2Y

It depends, the pro is that Britain has Australia’s back if we went to war but we are under a king who doesn’t even know what it’s like to live here

 @9C4C7NNfrom North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but abolish the current royal family and establish a brand new royal dynasty based around constitutional monarchy with autocratic powers.

 @B4FMNGWanswered…3wks3W

Yes, but the head of government should be one person but a committee, with a prime minister still in charge

 @B4BPF7Tanswered…3wks3W

No, I am satisfied with the current systems of government and worried what would happen if they had to be replaced by a new system.

 @B4B9G5Panswered…4wks4W

No, not until the last Australian dies who was asked to swear allegiance to the Queen/King when they became Australian citizens.

 @B2TTVMManswered…3mos3MO

I am neither for nor against a republic. The monarchy had it's place and is an outdated system, however, I don't agree with becoming a republic.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...