Try the political quiz

0 Reply

 @4Z92NJLNationalsfrom Western Australia answered…3yrs3Y

No need to promote it. They either are or are not. They don't promote heterosexualness, so why homosexualness?

 @4ZQ8V6Kfrom New South Wales answered…3yrs3Y

No, that money should be used to fund health services as gay/trans/etc are a mental health issue.

 @4ZPRSBHLiberalfrom Victoria answered…3yrs3Y

The Safe Schools programme should be modified to be less overtly LGBLT..

 @4ZB22XMfrom New South Wales answered…3yrs3Y

Teach acceptance of people, change the curriculum to be inclusive. Teach safe sex regardless of where you stick it, or where you take it.

 @53427KBfrom New South Wales answered…3yrs3Y

Safe schools should cover all forms of discrimination, body-ist, racist, etc as well as sexual choice. The information of sexual choice is also inaccurate overstating some cases 3 out of 4 transgender children grow out of it. Safe schools also encourages presently illegal behaviour and seeks to redefine 'normal'

 @4X5XDLHfrom New South Wales answered…3yrs3Y

People should reach adulthood before they are encouraged to pick a Gender while they are still impressionable.

 @4WMDQLSGreenfrom Western Australia answered…3yrs3Y

Re-jig to improve sex education in government schools, that applies to all students, and include material that educates on the need for tolerance for the LGBT community .

 @52GTNBGLaborfrom Victoria answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but address the wider issue of bullying instead of segregating sexual bullying

 @526CTTXLaborfrom New South Wales answered…3yrs3Y

 @4X6QHQWLiberal Democratfrom Western Australia answered…3yrs3Y

Segregating children based on sexual preference is not going to solve the problem. Neither will protecting them from bullying. They need to be taught how to defend themselves, because no bully cares who or what you are, they only care about how to hurt you.

 @4WYG3V8Liberalfrom New South Wales answered…3yrs3Y

No, I think we should be taught to accept other people and there difference whether its religion, race, gender and who they are attracted but we don't need a safe schools coalition to achieve this as this should be taught at home or school.

 @57VNWJSfrom Queensland answered…3yrs3Y

Also Parents and tougher consequences. Better Parental control over children, not those stupid laws we got.

 @526HK5Ffrom Queensland answered…3yrs3Y

Education and awareness are the keys to a successful life; however, just limiting education to freedom of gender orientation is limiting; as limiting as religious/feminist schools etc. Positive discrimination is as devisive as negative!

 @9L2WZWYCoalitionanswered…1mo1MO

I think that the government should restrict it to upper primary school and secondary school but change some of their approaches

 @932W8QLGreenanswered…2yrs2Y

 @932G43Yanswered…2yrs2Y

 @92ZFY5Janswered…2yrs2Y

 @92YPNQHanswered…2yrs2Y

 @92YPGN6answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, however the dialogue should be regulated to not sexualise children but promote acceptance of all

 @92YPBN9answered…2yrs2Y

More should be done against bullying, like criminal conviction at any age.

 @92XWML7answered…2yrs2Y

This should be secondary school issue and not primary school. Age appropriate to coincide with puberty & sexual identity

 @92XV6DGanswered…2yrs2Y

The government should find other organisations to fund that don’t have flaws.

 @92XV4NZanswered…2yrs2Y

 @92XPLBBanswered…2yrs2Y

The safe schools program is good but should start with high school kids rather than younger ones.

 @92X8XQXanswered…2yrs2Y

There should be a compulsory program about bullying, the effects, standing up to bullying if you are a bystander, and how everyone is different. A psychological approach.

 @Kelbev68One Nationanswered…2yrs2Y

Stop PROMOTING radical gender theory and let kids be kids. I agree with accepting and not shaming anyone, why does a kid need to have these ideas promoted to them? Let them naturally discover their preference.

 @92WKXXLanswered…2yrs2Y

An Anti bullying stance is necessary, but needs to be just that, across the board, not just pointed at members of the LGBTQI+ community.
If certain issues come up at a particular school then address the issues relevant at the time, within anti bullying framework.
All bullying needs to be addressed, discussed and dealt with. Not swept under the carpet as unimportant as it doesn’t fit the LBGTQI+ mold.

 @92WHX9Canswered…2yrs2Y

No, but ensure it is ran effectively and with real insight. Not enough done here. All sides of argument are not right.

 @92WHP37answered…2yrs2Y

We should stop forcing these issues on kids and start teaching them that they are loved and accepted regardless of how they dress or carry themselves, and regardless of who they love. Which they will figure out in their own time. Provide gender neutral toilets for kids caught up in this debarcle now but show children that you can still be female and appear more masculine or male and appear feminine. Because you are born as you are but there is only 1 you! No 1 person will be the same as another

 @92WGYNQanswered…2yrs2Y

We need to see the efficacy of these programs before we commit to a continuation or a reduction in this program

 @92WG6Q4answered…2yrs2Y

I think they should continue to fund them, but only to secondary schools.

 @92W9JSRanswered…2yrs2Y

 @92VPZLManswered…2yrs2Y

Not cut the funding entirely - only continue with secondary schooling

 @92VPDCJanswered…2yrs2Y

I think there needs to be far greater oversight and govt involvement

 @92T3FM5answered…2yrs2Y

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...