Try the political quiz

2 Replies

 @522WPB3from New South Wales answered…3yrs3Y

 @4Z64393from New South Wales answered…3yrs3Y

Terrorist yes. But do more on security it was never intended for e commerce and I keep getting porn viruses.

 @9KSZ8XCGreenanswered…1mo1MO

Yes, but only to prevent child pornography, illegal searches, harmful misinformation (such as anti-vaxx) and AI

 @9JDR754answered…3mos3MO

Yes, only to take down what is bad and what affects the government severely. They shouldn't regulate other people's business through the interent.

 @9GFRXXVGreenanswered…6mos6MO

Yes, but only to regulate use of computers or artificial intelligence creating images, voices, videos, or other media.

 @9DK5R2XLaboranswered…8mos8MO

The government shouldn’t outright ban websites without reason, but they should be able to restrict access to certain websites to protect people. They should also have the power to tackle illegal activities. ISPs should only retain data about usage of restricted websites.

 @9DDBFK5answered…8mos8MO

Yes but only to prevent people committing severe crimes like child pornography-related offences

 @9CN2PRTanswered…10mos10MO

No, but nationalize ISPs. The internet should be a public utility and public utilities should not have further restrictions than those already placed on media. We wouldn't ban books, we shouldn't ban anything on the internet unless it is absolutely a danger to society.

 @99YJYS4Greenanswered…1yr1Y

It's very suspicious that their isn't an answer that condemns child abuse without swallowing the copyright narrative.

People who download copywritten material aren't stealing. They wouldn't buy it in the first place. It's a bad faith argument from the start.

 @99X4SZ5answered…1yr1Y

Restrict websites like pornography for minors and restrict gore websites

 @99X4SSBanswered…1yr1Y

Increase protection to social media by youth under age limit but don't regulate internet

 @99BZKCKanswered…1yr1Y

 @997LC63Liberalanswered…1yr1Y

No, but material that is harmful, illegal or could lead to radicalisation should be removed

 @98WZG7LLaboranswered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only in as far as removing access to criminal activities that are unable to be shut down locally e.g. international human trade, smuggling, child porn etc...

 @988PJZ5answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only to prevent child pornography and other illicit/immoral content.

 @983NRV6answered…1yr1Y

Yes but only for things Like Child pornography or other illegal things.

 @97S6HKNanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, but block any child pornography and copyright infringement, but allow them the option to have the internet filtered or not besides the aforementioned child pornography.

 @92DNLPYLaboranswered…2yrs2Y

The government should regulate net neutrality to ensure internet traffic is treated equally and provide a level playing field. The government should not regulate the content on the internet other than illegal materials such as child abuse material

 @8Y8Z4CRLaboranswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only in clear ways, current regulation and future potential regulation is too vague and heavy handed control under the guise of 'safety for children' or 'anti trolling'

 @8V5M6JQLiberalanswered…3yrs3Y

Require ISPs to retain data for two years for police investigations.

 @9FVS3ZQGreenanswered…7mos7MO

General citizen media should not be regulated but government and military sites should obviously be regulated. Certain dangerous sites which explain how to make certain weapons or viruses, particularly WMD should mostly be restricted to military regulated sites though can be opened to an extent for educational purposes. Overall, the government should at least guarantee safety and privacy on the internet through access to reliable security networks to keep people safe and to prevent the wrong information getting into the wrong hands, but other than that, the internet should be a free place of discussion and communication.

 @96JGR6BLaboranswered…2yrs2Y

yes but only to take away all the bad things and the black market and do not require ips to retain data

 @936FVYManswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only to censor child pornography, not to monitor anyone. There are people who will track them down independently

 @933YGXBGreenanswered…2yrs2Y

 @92Z7Y9Qanswered…2yrs2Y

 @92WBP9Qanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, regulate social media networks, and prevent illegal activities as a last resort.

 @92DKHTJLiberal Democratanswered…2yrs2Y

Never, & Never censor or monitor data. the Government should have no rights and power over it at anywhere anytime and Must be Eradicated ASAP!.

 @92CJH45answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only for child pornography, drug trafficking, and violent illegal activity (not copyright infringement)

 @927ZNDVanswered…2yrs2Y

 @8ZPZ5CNGreenanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, to prevent child pornography, sex trafficking but also to track down and hold people accountable for spreading hate speech on platforms such as Reddit, 4chan and 8chan

 @8YWHHNVGreenanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only to prevent crimes like child pornography, abuse of animals or people. It should be transparent and known, to deter criminal activity - hopefully.

 @8TK8FQQanswered…3yrs3Y

 @92SYBWXanswered…2yrs2Y

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...