CRISPR is a powerful tool for editing genomes, allowing for precise modifications to DNA that allows scientists to better understand gene functions, model diseases more accurately, and develop innovative treatments. Proponents argue that regulation ensures safe and ethical use of the technology. Opponents argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and scientific progress.
@9VMB7Y82mos2MO
I feel it can be used, but it would make everyone less unique. It would benefit chances of being bullied however if puts the world at a disadvantage because individuals are no longer different.
@9TKSK4D2mos2MO
I could be into it if it's means we can be like people (good people) from Cyberpunk
@9SMKKPV3mos3MO
The government should only regulate to make sure that the use is ethical and will only benefit people, not harm them
As long as it is before birth, and has the child's best interests at heart.
@9RSXS5H4mos4MO
Yes, while providing all legal allegations and cases to the public
Yes, until science companies and labs can be trusted with these ethical concerns and responsibilities.
@9X86DB34wks4W
maybe, external party should also be apart of regulating, checking, and signing off.
@9W7FMBV1mo1MO
Yes but also, there should be exceptions like amputees, visually impaired and retarded people.
@9VPLW8R2mos2MO
i hate genetic modificatons stay as what u are born as
Yes, but also no as CRISPR is still a widely unknown field of research
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.