Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
8>8 Personal answerPro-life, but allow when danger to mother, and if that is the only abortion allowed I can deal with the government funding all of it |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Social › Gay Marriage
8>8 Personal answerThe government, or any other institution for that matter, should have no say in who marries or how they marry |
the Economy › Equal Pay
8>8 Personal answerNo, this is irrelevant because the gender wage gap is a myth |
Healthcare › Drug Price Regulation
8>8 Personal answerNo, but it should prevent the monopolies running them. |
Science › Mandatory Vaccinations
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Social › Euthanasia
8>8 Personal answerNo, but they should be allowed to refuse artificial life support |
Social › Death Penalty
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence, and the inmate gets to chose how they are killed, so long as it is reasonable. |
the Economy › Taxes
8>8 Personal answerReform to a flat tax |
Social › Hate Speech
8>8 Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
8>8 Personal answerNo, this will only cause prices to increase in a never ending cycle |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
8>8 Personal answerYes, but with less overall focus on military training and more focus on education and skills devleopment and those that want proper military training should be able to choose and should not be forced to. |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
8>8 Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Social › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answerThis should not be a political question because it is outside the domain of government. Let sporting organizations decide this question for themselves. |
the Environment › Fracking
8>8 Personal answerNo, but I dont think the government should ban it |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
8>8 Personal answerYes, but it should only cover very basic and simple topics |
Social › Niqāb
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
8>8 Personal answerNo, recession is a natural cycle that purges excess |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
8>8 Personal answerYes, as long as it is safe for them to return to their country |
Domestic Policy › Whistleblower Protection
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security |
Healthcare › COVID Mask Mandate
8>8 Personal answerNo, the government should recommend it but not require it |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Elections
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests |
the Environment › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
8>8 Personal answerYes, but scale back our current involvement |
Healthcare › Single-Payer Healthcare
8>8 Personal answerCombine Medicaid, Medicare, and S-CHIP into one bureaucracy. Public Option for all adults through Medicaid/Medicare for catastrophic coverage, children covered automatically, adults participate in Health Savings Account co-pay for non-emergency treatments with citizen paying 30%-100% of costs depending on citizen's income. All elective procedures will be paid for by consumer. This will bring actual consumer price controls and transparency to distorted health care market. Medicare will negotiate prices for pharmaceuticals and medical devices which is done in other smaller countries very successfully, the difference being Medicare will be negotiating with the leverage of 330 million people as opposed to smaller democracies whose populations are fractions of the United States'. |
Domestic Policy › Social Media Regulation
8>8 Personal answerNo, the government should not determine what is fake or real news |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
8>8 Personal answerNo, this will encourage people not to work and harm economic growth |
Social › Women in Combat
8>8 Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men |
the Economy › Welfare
8>8 Personal answerMore, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
8>8 Personal answerYes, they should not receive benefits if they are on any non-perscription or non-medicinal drugs, but drug use should not be criminalized |
Science › Nuclear Energy
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › North Korea Military Strikes
8>8 Personal answerNope that is a perfect way to start a world war |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
8>8 Personal answerLower, but eliminate deductions and loop holes |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
8>8 Personal answerYes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence |
Elections › Campaign Finance
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Transportation › Public Transportation
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
8>8 Personal answerNo, But we should encourage immigrants to learn English |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
8>8 Personal answeryes, but only if we are trying to get them off of the drugs |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
8>8 Personal answerThere are too many variables involved to make a general rule of thumb decision. the number of work visas available should be constantly adjusted based on both the US economy and the World economy. |
the Economy › Labor Unions
8>8 Personal answerA little bit of both. People abuse every system and I'm not exactly sure how these work help. |
Immigration › Dual Citizenship
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
8>8 Personal answerYes, any citizen that pays taxes should be allowed to vote |
the Economy › Government Spending
8>8 Personal answerYes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional |
the Economy › Domestic Jobs
8>8 Personal answerCongress should, not the president |
Crime › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answerTak money from police administration and put it towards officer training until they meet the standards of any given state then provide bonuses to admins who meet those standards |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation |
the Economy › Farm Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › World Health Organization
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
8>8 Personal answerNo, this is a violation of free speech |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
8>8 Personal answerjust gotta stay ahead of China and Russia combined. We are currently doing that many times over |
Domestic Policy › Term Limits
8>8 Personal answerNo, we already have term limits that are called “elections” |
Domestic Policy › Political Advertising on Social Media
8>8 Personal answerThat should be left totally to the discretion of those private companies. |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Crime › Prison Overcrowding
8>8 Personal answerNo, but we should increase funding to offer education and skill building services for prisoners |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
8>8 Personal answerI have NO IDEA. |
the Economy › Tech Monopolies
8>8 Personal answerNo, Just don't let those companies buy members of the state, make sure they follow the laws and don't allow the deliberate creation or use of loopholes. |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
8>8 Personal answershould be done on a case by case basis |
the Environment › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerNo, the government should never subsidize private businesses |
the Economy › State Ownership
8>8 Personal answerNo, the government should never own shares of private companies |
Education › Charter Schools
8>8 Personal answerI believe that both private and public schools should be improved, and parents should have the freedom to choose where they’d like to send their children. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You are a centrist on right wing and left wing issues. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically correct and politically incorrect issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on security and privacy issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “isolationism”, meaning you more often believe we should focus attention on our most pressing issues at home instead of involving ourselves in non-threatening issues abroad. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on progressive and traditional issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “small government”, meaning you more often believe the government is overly bureaucratic, inefficient, and wasteful. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “laissez-faire”, meaning you more often believe government intervention in economic markets leads to long term negative results. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on deregulation and regulation issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “assimilation”, meaning you more often believe we should be a unified culture. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 16 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.