Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Reply

 @4TH6SCXfrom Queensland  answered…4yrs4Y

Australia should ban all immigration of Muslim people as they do not assimilate with the Multicultural and democratic way of life here in Australia. Since allowing Muslims into Australia, violence and in particular violence against females has increased substantially. Furthermore, the practice of the Muslim religion should also be banned here in Australia. All mosques should be turned into domestic violence shelters for women. All halal products should be banned also. Muslim only want to change Australia into the horrible country they left and remove the rights of Australians. They recruit the Aboriginal community to rise up against the rest of Australia.

 @4V57V7Jfrom Queensland  answered…4yrs4Y

This is the Most racist thing are we back in Negro day You should be embarrassed putting this on Am not a Muslim either

 @4ZR4GM9from New South Wales  answered…4yrs4Y

Political correctness is killing the western world. We're so concerned with being called racists we bow to someone calling us silly names. There needs to be a massive injection of common sense and prudency to expidite processes as well as support in place once refugees are processed to stem the flow of problems.

 @4TMZLTPfrom Victoria  answered…4yrs4Y

Whilst I agree that banning is unconstitutional, I believe that Muslims are as much of a problem as Roman Catholics were and still are.

 @4ZJ9F37Greenfrom New South Wales  answered…4yrs4Y

This is so racist to assume only Muslims are terrorists. They are victims of terrorism. Let them in.

 @4ZMCRHGLiberalfrom New South Wales  answered…4yrs4Y

We should add a question to the immigration test "Are you a terrorist" "Do you like beer and bacon?" "Do you have a beard?" If the answers go yes, no ,yes then we should reconsider letting them in...

 @4ZJFFFRfrom Victoria  answered…4yrs4Y

A one year moratorium on all immigration from groups identified as being a 'cultural assimilation risk'

 @4YNBG6HFamily Firstfrom Queensland  answered…4yrs4Y

Seriously this is being discussed. How about we also stop all Christians in case they are affiliated with the KKK. Yes lets discriminate against Muslim immigrants because all terror plots in Aus haven't been from home grown terrorists. NO as Australians we cannot and should not discriminate, normal screening is ok.

 @4WR94CVfrom Western Australia  answered…4yrs4Y

That is a racist policy. Yes there is concern at the moment about radical Islamics, however it was once radical Christians and other faiths. Processes for refugee status should be the same, no matter the religion or culture.

 @4VV9XR3from Queensland  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but we must screen them carefully and we should take asylum seekers on a triage basis so that those most at risk from attack in refugee camps and of persecution (such as homosexuals, atheists and apostates, Christians, Kurds and Yazidis and Ahmaddiya Muslims are settled first and Sunni and Shia Muslims last unless they can prove a commitment to Australian values. We should not take any immigrants that force female family members to wear head-coverings or that agree with child-marriage or that agree with 'honour' violence or the persecution of others (be they atheist, Jew, homosexual or members of other sects).

 @4SZJHPDfrom Queensland  answered…4yrs4Y

No, banning someone based on their religion is racist and un-Australian. However, we do need better screening processes and more extensive background checks.

 @4SY97Y2Greenfrom Victoria  answered…4yrs4Y

Why does this question keep turning up in every election survey? I am growing tired of this question. I don't see how any muslim person should be any more suspicious than any other person coming into Australia. In a hypothetical response Japan has a criminal organisation called Yakusa. Organised crime gangs exist beyond religion. Japan itself does not have muslims.

 @4SVD6VQfrom Northern Territory  answered…4yrs4Y

Terrorists? we have had no terrorist attacks here. The threat is greatly exaggerated, it's a Government scare campaign.

 @9FXXVTTanswered…2yrs2Y

It shouldn't be isolated to a particular religion. Everyone should be screened and granted visa on its merit. Religion has nothing to do with terrorism.

 @9FNH2K7answered…2yrs2Y

if they are a refugee then they are fine but if they are an asylum seeker then no

 @9FFQ8Q5answered…2yrs2Y

No, government must improve its screening process for immigrants from “high risk” countries

 @9F6BT3BLaboranswered…2yrs2Y

Check their record first and if they are convicted of a single crime then ban.

 @9DMGL8MLaboranswered…2yrs2Y

No, that is unethical and stereotypically racist. However more efforts should be done to check peoples background thoroughly before allowing to enter the country.

 @9DHZF6JLiberalanswered…2yrs2Y

 @9D67BZ4answered…2yrs2Y

 @99Z6H9Banswered…2yrs2Y

 @99Z6GQ9answered…2yrs2Y

Long terms impacts on banning can lead to discrimination of people from certain ethnicities . Manage this by creating national and international security measure that monitor such activities

 @99XV3XHLiberalanswered…2yrs2Y

No, but tougher screening measures need to be made. Which also include post immigration tracking for screening

 @99T74K7answered…2yrs2Y

We should keep them in a healthy place being looked after for a maximum of 7 days to unsure it is safe for them to enter the country

 @96KQRRPanswered…3yrs3Y

They are allowed here and terrorism is allowed depending on the context however creating drama is part of the essence of human life.

 @96JJTR7Laboranswered…3yrs3Y

No, banning thousands in need because of a minority of terrorists is unconstitutional. Instead, the government should find a way to keep those who are already in the country safe while helping Muslim immigrants find safety while improving their abilities to screen out potential terrorists.

 @96GVRQDLaboranswered…3yrs3Y

I believe you shouldn't blame most terrorism attacks on Muslim's and should instead limit muslim immigrants.

 @96FSSJYanswered…3yrs3Y

no, but they should be offered the chance to have a better idea of communication

 @95CLZH8answered…3yrs3Y

 @94HZ754answered…3yrs3Y

 @942NC2Xanswered…3yrs3Y

They should go through thorough and extra checks, and be monitored. Be on a higher alet

 @HippopiJanswered…3yrs3Y

No, but individuals who support Sharia law and indicate they want it implemented in Australia should not be allowed.

 @93R3M8Yanswered…3yrs3Y

No the govt should be able to develop screening tools to the same standard as any other country has achieved

 @93HBJ5Canswered…3yrs3Y

Wait till they have gone through background checks but also provide support

 @93GJJHJanswered…3yrs3Y

I think to check their records first to determine if they're a threat or not. That will determine if they are banned from immigrating or not.

 @93B23X4answered…3yrs3Y

If you’re going to screen muslim people for the potential to partake in terrorist activity, then all migrants who are religious or non religious should be screened for potential threat to National safety.

 @939KTRWanswered…3yrs3Y

 @935KJDCanswered…3yrs3Y

The applicant should be screened and, if they are cleared, should be allowed to immigrate to Australia.

 @93599H6Laboranswered…3yrs3Y

 @9354VC9answered…3yrs3Y

Should be able to do a proper screen of the person before they are allowed over

 @93539QZanswered…3yrs3Y

 @93538KKIndependentanswered…3yrs3Y

A probationary period could be introduced to ensure that potential immigrants show that they support Australian values.

 @9353898One Nationanswered…3yrs3Y

We should not penalise the many because of a few. But screening should be done

 @934ZXHVGreenanswered…3yrs3Y

Don’t keep out anyone except those high risk individuals based on their own circumstances rather than country

 @934Z5Q4answered…3yrs3Y

No, but they should go through a rehabilitation and integration to society program to ensure they’re adapted to western life, gain education and are provided psychological support

 @934YQRManswered…3yrs3Y

Australia needs to LOOK AFTER OUR OWN PEOPLE and take care of us. We have more homeless people by population to the size difference in area than America

 @934TYBCanswered…3yrs3Y

Any immigrant entering the country should be subject to the same security checks.

 @934TDHBanswered…3yrs3Y

No, but we should put immediate funding towards developing these screenings as to avoid long waiting periods at Papua New Guinea.

 @934RKTJanswered…3yrs3Y

 @934N95Zanswered…3yrs3Y

 @934CQDHanswered…3yrs3Y

No, it is up to the Australian government to improve their screening procedures, not on the immigrants themselves, provided they enter the country through proper procedures.

 @9347FQSanswered…3yrs3Y

No but higher screening checks should be run to determine the safety of the country

 @9346FSDanswered…3yrs3Y

I believe they should ho through larger testing and psychological evaluation

 @933ZGW7answered…3yrs3Y

No but they need to adhere to our rules. Eg. one wife not multiple wives. Follow our laws not what they think

 @933W2PHGreenanswered…3yrs3Y

I don't believe they should be banned but they possibly need to be delayed until screening is improved.

 @933VH4Zanswered…3yrs3Y

Only to screen all people coming in not just muslins. That’s not right.

 @933QCCHanswered…3yrs3Y

No, banning immigrant based on their religion is unconstitutional, But a possible reporting process or something to monitor and make sure they adhere to the law

 @933L7D3answered…3yrs3Y

Again depends on the situation, I don't think just because you're a Muslim that you're a terrorist. I know heaps and they seem fine.

 @9336J29answered…3yrs3Y

 @932YMM6answered…3yrs3Y

No, but screening process need to be increased massively to protect Australian's from all immigration

 @932YHNJanswered…3yrs3Y

Screen everyone in detention centres but improve the welfare of the centres.

 @932V8HSanswered…3yrs3Y

 @932TZQKanswered…3yrs3Y

No but they still should have a background check on them and be treated with respect till proven other wise

 @932FL4Vanswered…3yrs3Y

They should be properly screened and held in humane, short term accommodation until they have been investigated. No longer then 3 months.

 @932CBL7answered…3yrs3Y

No; however, all due diligence in terms of screening terrorism threats should be taken from higher-risk populations. But, no one should be banned.

 @92ZJDQDanswered…3yrs3Y

 @92ZHS7Qanswered…3yrs3Y

Everyone needs to be treated equally, but everyone needs to be screened. These screens need to happen quickly.

 @92ZGVMPanswered…3yrs3Y

Should only be allowed in under skilled visas with full background checks like any other immigrant. Religion has nothing to do with it

 @92ZFXQDanswered…3yrs3Y

Needs grounded practices, life experience accompanied by qualifications not text book readers.

 @92ZDPT6answered…3yrs3Y

if the govt was not lazy, incompetent, hiding agendas we would have already worked this out

 @92Z9XFLanswered…3yrs3Y

 @92YPFR3answered…3yrs3Y

No, but strong security/background checks must be conducted before admitting them in.

 @92Y8VCFanswered…3yrs3Y

Ban people who committed a crime in the community and swap them with a person in a migration Center waiting for. Approval . ie - trail run 5 year before approval . Probation period . Violent crime will not be tolerated