@4YYWWRC

4>4  Personal answerPro-choice

4>4  Personal answerYes

4>4  Personal answerMarriage should be between any two adult people who want to legally bind their love for each other. No religious or government entity should have any right to make that decision for any couple unless it is incest!

4>4  Personal answerYes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

4>4  Personal answerYes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production

4>4  Personal answerYes, but only in the safety of the general public. A court order should be sought to monitor known criminals and associates. Any suspect or associate of terrorism should absolutely be monitored without a court order to ensure every effort is made to prevent any act of terror occurring. If monitoring of anyone shows nothing suspicious, any information obtained during the time of monitoring should kept absolutely confidential.

4>4  Personal answerYes, it should be recognised that they were the original land occupiers of Australia. It should not go to a referendum.

4>4  Personal answerYes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness

4>4  Personal answerLower the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations

4>4  Personal answerYes

4>4  Personal answerYes

4>4  Personal answerNo

4>4  Personal answerYes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record

4>4  Personal answerYes, and make it a living wage

4>4  Personal answerYes

4>4  Personal answerIt is ironic that the average working Registered Nurse working in a private hospital can not afford private health insurance to receive care that is provided by that nurse. Healthcare services need to be accessible by everyone even if it means increased taxes for that purpose. The healthcare system must be forward moving only.

4>4  Personal answerYes

4>4  Personal answerWho ever is most suitable for the position should have the position, a persons gender is irrelevant!

4>4  Personal answerYes, but in the form of tax breaks for all citizens

4>4  Personal answerYes

4>4  Personal answerYes

4>4  Personal answerNo

4>4  Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men

4>4  Personal answerYes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians

4>4  Personal answerNo, turn the boats back at sea and process them offshore with hard security checks and temporary protection visas

4>4  Personal answerIncrease for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses

4>4  Personal answerYes, but increase environmental restrictions and oversight

4>4  Personal answerNo

4>4  Personal answerOnly for those who will truly benefit from use of it, ie terminally ill people. There is too much evidence associating marijuana with psychosis and long term ill mental health

4>4  Personal answerYes

4>4  Personal answerNo

4>4  Personal answerDecrease, and the government should provide more incentives to prepare our citizens for these jobs

4>4  Personal answerIt should only be developed if it will benefit Australia as a whole. It needs to be regulated and should not be privatised.

4>4  Personal answerYes

4>4  Personal answerYes. Any saving should go toward lessening the government's financial deficit, public education and anything that will ultimately benefit the future of Australia. Banning negative gearing may lessen the want for people to lease out investment properties and possibly allow more first time home buyers into the market of home ownership. Foreign ownership of housing should also be eradicated.

4>4  Personal answerYes, allow exports to countries which enforce animal cruelty laws

4>4  Personal answerNo, but possibly later when it's affordable

4>4  Personal answerHelp, but ban their ability to make political donations

4>4  Personal answerNo, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead

4>4  Personal answerNo, just prevent Japanese whaling in Australian waters

4>4  Personal answerYes, but only small local farms instead of large corporations

4>4  Personal answerYes

4>4  Personal answerI don't know. I have a well paying job and can pay my bills fine, but can not yet get into the housing market as a 10% deposit minimum requirement equates to approximately my annual income. The Australian dream for the average middle class Australian is becoming harder and harder. The average land sizes in metropolitan Adelaide are ridiculous. I'm 30 now and grew up with about 500 square meters of yard to play in only 5 minutes drive out of the heart of the city of Adelaide. My children won't have a court yard to play in 30+ minutes drive out of the city.

4>4  Personal answerThe pension is means tested for retirees, what makes a retired government worker any different not to mention politicians who too should be means tested for any benefit at any point in their career and life.

4>4  Personal answerHospitals need to run #1 to benefit the patient and #2 to benefit its workers.

4>4  Personal answerIncrease, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced

4>4  Personal answerYes, as long as offshore income is reported and harsh penalties are enforced for anyone who deliberately evade taxes.

4>4  Personal answerDecrease, until we drastically reduce our national budget deficit

4>4  Personal answerNo

4>4  Personal answerNo

4>4  Personal answerOur school students are the future of this country. It's frustrating that they aren't extreme priority. Regardless of who provides the funding, it needs to be distributed fairly to equally benefit students even if it's on a needs basis.

4>4  Personal answerI don't see how it matters either way. It'd just be nice to see people who genuinely want what is best for the country running it

4>4  Personal answerNo, we should establish a national broad-based anti-corruption watchdog instead