Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
5>5 Personal answerMake genome reading cheaper so that people will know what risks are involved in them reproducing, allow abortion for rape, incest, certainty of defect and danger to mother and child but only in the first trimester of pregnancy. |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
5>5 Personal answerNo, and adoption agencies should prioritize offering children to straight couples before offering to gay couples |
Social › Gay Marriage
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Mental Health
5>5 Personal answerYes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Government Surveillance
5>5 Personal answerNo, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications |
Domestic Policy › Aboriginal recognition
5>5 Personal answerTo be honest, Im sick of recognizing Aboriginal people. this country is going to end up being run by Aboriginals soon and the white man will be a second class citizen. Hell we can't even claim racism when an Aboriginal calls us whiteys or crackers or honky or any racial slur. |
Social › Euthanasia
5>5 Personal answerIf someone is living in 24 hour pain and has no chance of ever returning to a normal pain free life then yes. |
Healthcare › Universal Dental Care
5>5 Personal answerNot just rural areas. Medicare dental should be available to everyone who doesnt have private health insurance. |
the Environment › Foreign Land Ownership
5>5 Personal answerNo, we should protect the jobs of our farmers |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
5>5 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Internet Regulation
5>5 Personal answerNo, do not censor or monitor data |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatisation
5>5 Personal answerLess, and provide more government funding |
Domestic Policy › Woman Quotas
5>5 Personal answerAt this point in time I dont really care if there are womeni n the cabinet, as I feel extremely let down by our government in general, whether it be male or female. |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
5>5 Personal answerI think we should halt all immigration right now. We are already becoming a self segregating country with areas that only one ethnic populace is willing to live in. Immigration has not helped this country grow. It has created racial tension and racial warfare. |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
5>5 Personal answerYes but only marijuana. Drastically increase the penalties for using higher end drugs. |
Social › Women in Combat
5>5 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
5>5 Personal answerYes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians |
Immigration › Boat Immigrants
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Coal Seam Gas
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Science › Nuclear Energy
5>5 Personal answerWe need to move forward into a lot more solar and wind related production. |
Education › University Funding
5>5 Personal answerNo, and univerisity education should be free for all citizens |
Healthcare › Marijuana
5>5 Personal answerYes, and legalise, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it |
Domestic Policy › GP Visits
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Social › Safe Schools
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Crime › Adler A110 Ban
5>5 Personal answerBring in a policy that sets up a system of registered hunters for wild animal control. Limit these hunters to only necessary firearms, have very tight regulations on the hunting licences, ban all other guns from the country and make penalties for possessing a firearm very severe. |
Domestic Policy › Live Exports
5>5 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Genetically Modified Foods
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › High Speed Rail
5>5 Personal answerWe have so many other things that need money right now. This country is sick. Fix what stuff we have before we get more stuff. |
the Economy › Government Spending
5>5 Personal answerThat depends on where the public spending is. Schools and hospitals need more money, the people who live under the poverty line need more money.How about instead of putting more taxes on the people who cant afford to live now, you increase taxes on the rich end of the scale, they can afford it. This way national debt will be removed in no time, there would be less pressure on the hospital system, There will be more educated people in our country and things would just get better. |
the Environment › Uranium
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Social › Parental Leave
5>5 Personal answerParental leave should last 6 months and be paid at the same rate that the parent was receiving at work. Both parents should be entitled to this. Take the spare change that you found in your pocket the other day Malcolm Turnbull. That should fund that policy for ten years or so. |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
5>5 Personal answerMost of the populace in general no longer cares who is in government. There is nothing but lies and empty promises coming from our politicians so in all reality, who cares who votes. |
Domestic Policy › Housing Bubble
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Nuclear Waste
5>5 Personal answerShoot it into the sun. |
Healthcare › Hospitals
5>5 Personal answerHospitals need more government funding. Most of the populace cant afford private health care and so rely on the public system to look after them. ow about you lot in government take some of that millions of dollars lost down the back of your lounge and give it to the people that need it. |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
5>5 Personal answerWe need to look after our own people before we try to look after any other country. The homeless, the frail, the elderly, the mentally ill, the poor. This country has enough problems of its own without trying to help others. |
Foreign Policy › Free Trade
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Education › Public School
5>5 Personal answerI dont care who funds our public schools, they need more money and less should go to private schools. |
Domestic Policy › Monarchy
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You are a centrist on right wing and left wing issues. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically correct and politically incorrect issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on security and privacy issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “isolationism”, meaning you more often believe we should focus attention on our most pressing issues at home instead of involving ourselves in non-threatening issues abroad. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on progressive and traditional issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “small government”, meaning you more often believe the government is overly bureaucratic, inefficient, and wasteful. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “laissez-faire”, meaning you more often believe government intervention in economic markets leads to long term negative results. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on deregulation and regulation issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “assimilation”, meaning you more often believe we should be a unified culture. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…8mos8MO
▲ 1k9 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…3mos3MO
▲ 96 replies
@ISIDEWITH asked…12mos12MO
▲ 7034 replies
@ISIDEWITH asked…4yrs4Y
▲ 2.2k36 replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
