@ISIDEWITHQuestionsHousing IssuesStarted 3yrs agoActive 4 days ago

Should homeless individuals, that have refused available shelter or housing, be allowed to sleep or encamp on public property?

+
Expand
+ Settings

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 82.8k Australia voters.

55%
Yes
45%
No
37%
Yes
44%
No
18%
Yes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine
1%
No, and make it a criminal offense

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 82.8k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 82.8k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @932FW2Manswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and we should look at why they have refused available shelter i.e. maybe they have had bad experiences before

 @B275ZKRanswered…4 days4D

Yes, provided that the refusal of accommodation or services is due to another risk imposed upon them by said services. The accommodation and services must be safe.

 @9ZQ5MDKanswered…1mo1MO

If they don't want to stay in a shelter, then why are they on the streets, it looks like an eyesore, all the rubish and

 @9XV95S3answered…2mos2MO

yes but they should be encouraged and assisted in finding permanent residence and forms of income off the streets.

 @9WK5783answered…2mos2MO

I feel like it should have a limit on which public property like for examples they could only camp or sleep at parks or caravan parks but not schools and librarys and governmental buildings for education or buisness and etc because it can ruin the building potentially and also ruin how schools would be viewed.

 @9W7FMBVanswered…2mos2MO

No, there should be higher incentivisation for them to go to camps and housing, while other alternatives like low cost motels open to all kinds of people should be opened to help accommodate homeless people and give them the chance for a normal standard of living.

 @9W5H8VNanswered…2mos2MO

they can sleep on public property as long as they aren’t disturbing or hurting/threatening anyone. when there are people living on public property and smoking crack/heroine and yelling at me threatening names, that’s not okay.

 @9W2ZHNHanswered…3mos3MO

yes but the public property should be able to move them on if they are causing a large disturbance to the local community

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Homeless Encampments” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3mos3MO

Drug Crisis Prompts Portland to Reboot City Government

In a sign of either hope or desperation, Portland voters decided to throw out their entire government structure and replace it with a weaker mayor, expanded City Council and ranked choice voting.A major driving factor was the passage of “Measure 110” decriminalizing all drugs in 2020, which was backed by 74 percent of Multnomah County’s residents. Voters couldn’t — or at least didn’t — anticipate how this policy change would reshape a city already strapped for money, dealing with a public health crisis and confronting rising rates of homelessness and fentanyl abuse.Drug use shot up, homelessness worsened and taxpayers fled.“Political rhetoric in 2020-2021 in the City of Portland was incredibly ideologically driven,” Gonzalez said, explaining that there was a “default conversation” on topics like homelessness or police reform that shut down an exchange of ideas.The City Council race, meanwhile, is mayhem. Portland is switching from four at-large seats to twelve seats representing four districts. The dozens of candidates include Black Lives Matter leaders, nonprofit advocates, business owners and police officers.There are 19 people running for mayor and 98 people seeking seats on the City Council. They’re nearly all campaigning on left-of-center platforms — this is Portland.Pandemic closures, protests, elevated crime rates and rising homelessness buffeted many liberal cities in recent years, including San Francisco and Minneapolis. But policy choices made by the city and state aggravated their impact in Portland.The ramifications are measurable: Nearly 12,000 people moved out of Multnomah County between 2020 and 2023, per data from Portland State University. The exodus between 2020 and 2021 alone took nearly $1.1 billion in taxable income out of the city, according to data analyzed by the Economic Innovation Group. Portland’s once bustling downtown is nearly empty, and a negative national reputation clouds its economic future.Drug decriminalization and the city’s open camping rules compounded the feeling of insecurity. Homeless encampments spread through empty public spaces and filled sidewalks during the lockdown, and some became epicenters for the fentanyl trade. Even Portlanders who voted for decriminalization and believe in a compassionate approach to homelessness didn’t feel as safe in their own neighborhoods.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.