Should homeless individuals, that have refused available shelter or housing, be allowed to sleep or encamp on public property?

It’s not a black and white yes or no answer. Why are they refusing? Do they have other issues that play into that decision of theirs? Is there a way that we can still help them?

Yes but we need to understand their reasons for refusal to inform support mechanisms so they should be approached by police to gather this data

they shouldn't be on the streets and we should give better living standards to more unfortunate people.

It depends on whether or not it entrenches on public property that could allow them to fall into harm

I think the "why" of that question is important; Why have they refused available shelter. If it's a legitimate safety issue that isn't addressed, then a homeless individual may have a legitimate case for sleeping on public property. Statistics ay show that, overall, shelter and housing is generally safer than sleeping rough, but statistics look at groups, not individuals, and individuals get singled out. Putting them in shelter or housing (collecting all the eggs in one basket, soto speak) can make them as an individual an easier target. If they are able to find a secluded public place, away from a known area of target, they could potentially be safer. Statistics are good for overall bottom lines, not an individual's personal safety.

Yes, create certain public spaces where they are allowed. Provide basic amenities and mental health assistance.

Depends on the reason they refused available shelter, create additional social programs that are more safe and accessible