+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 7.3k Australia voters.

52%
Yes
48%
No
52%
Yes
48%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 7.3k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 7.3k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZTPDVManswered…3wks3W

No, but incentivise manufacturers to be more strict with their emission standards and to retire diesel vehicles.

 @9ZMSSFBanswered…1mo1MO

Given the fact China, India and Russia provide more carbon emissions than the rest of the world combined, any restrictions we put on ourselves feels largely ceremonial and pointless

 @9W7FMBVanswered…2mos2MO

Emissions standards should consist of reliably getting eco-friendly energy to the public, incentivising energy and not hurting people immediately as well as giving time for energy companies to switch over to not bankrupt businesses.

 @9VVZXF9answered…2mos2MO

Diesel engines may make more pollution but changing to a petrol engine is only a little step and not the overall answer.

 @9NVZ3QLanswered…6mos6MO

Yes, but only with government subsidies to prevent high costs, and no government intervention in the availability of diesel vehicles.

 @9TQ5HHDanswered…3mos3MO

Yes, as long as costs for manufacturers are subsidised, and the availability of diesel vehicles is not reduced.

 @9SYC4SQanswered…4mos4MO

Yes but add a bit of subsidies for consumers who can’t afford the newer and more environmentally friendly vehicles.

 @9SQ56QGanswered…4mos4MO

yes, but not too much to the extent where manufacterers and consumers are suffering economically.