+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 181 Anti-Islam voters.

16%
Yes
84%
No
16%
Yes
84%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 181 Anti-Islam voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 181 Anti-Islam voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Anti-Islam voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZMSSFBanswered…5 days5D

Given the fact China, India and Russia provide more carbon emissions than the rest of the world combined, any restrictions we put on ourselves feels largely ceremonial and pointless

 @9W7FMBVanswered…1mo1MO

Emissions standards should consist of reliably getting eco-friendly energy to the public, incentivising energy and not hurting people immediately as well as giving time for energy companies to switch over to not bankrupt businesses.

 @9VVZXF9answered…1mo1MO

Diesel engines may make more pollution but changing to a petrol engine is only a little step and not the overall answer.

 @9NVZ3QLanswered…6mos6MO

Yes, but only with government subsidies to prevent high costs, and no government intervention in the availability of diesel vehicles.

 @9TQ5HHDanswered…2mos2MO

Yes, as long as costs for manufacturers are subsidised, and the availability of diesel vehicles is not reduced.

 @9SYC4SQanswered…3mos3MO

Yes but add a bit of subsidies for consumers who can’t afford the newer and more environmentally friendly vehicles.

 @9SQ56QGanswered…3mos3MO

yes, but not too much to the extent where manufacterers and consumers are suffering economically.

 @9RZM3V9answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but only if increasing costs for manufacturers are subsidised, and the availability of diesel vehicles is not compromised.