+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 398 Steven Miles voters.

56%
Yes
44%
No
56%
Yes
44%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 398 Steven Miles voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 398 Steven Miles voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Steven Miles voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZMSSFBanswered…1wk1W

Given the fact China, India and Russia provide more carbon emissions than the rest of the world combined, any restrictions we put on ourselves feels largely ceremonial and pointless

 @9W7FMBVanswered…1mo1MO

Emissions standards should consist of reliably getting eco-friendly energy to the public, incentivising energy and not hurting people immediately as well as giving time for energy companies to switch over to not bankrupt businesses.

 @9VVZXF9answered…2mos2MO

Diesel engines may make more pollution but changing to a petrol engine is only a little step and not the overall answer.

 @9NVZ3QLanswered…6mos6MO

Yes, but only with government subsidies to prevent high costs, and no government intervention in the availability of diesel vehicles.

 @9TQ5HHDanswered…2mos2MO

Yes, as long as costs for manufacturers are subsidised, and the availability of diesel vehicles is not reduced.

 @9SYC4SQanswered…3mos3MO

Yes but add a bit of subsidies for consumers who can’t afford the newer and more environmentally friendly vehicles.

 @9SQ56QGanswered…3mos3MO

yes, but not too much to the extent where manufacterers and consumers are suffering economically.

 @9RZM3V9answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but only if increasing costs for manufacturers are subsidised, and the availability of diesel vehicles is not compromised.