+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 320k Australia voters.

38%
Yes
62%
No
16%
Yes
60%
No
19%
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
2%
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
2%
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
1%
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 320k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 320k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9SB2X2Yanswered…8mos8MO

Yes, depends on the severity of the crime and the circumstances regarding both the context and the trial process, (ie. if it's biased)

 @9KC7CVXanswered…1yr1Y

yes, as long as the crime was minor and properly looked into/ extra support behind the scenes to be more closely watched

 @9D4R96Lanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed during office and the sentence is complete

 @9ZMSSFBanswered…5mos5MO

They should be able to because in recent years we have seen political parties weaponise the justice system to try and prevent rivals from being able to qualify for elections. The people should be able to vote and if their crimes are detestable leave that for the public to decide.

 @B4MRGKJanswered…5 days5D

It depends on the crime, and the system that found them guilty. People silenced by a corrupt regime should definitely not be excluded from office.

 @B4KY9J3answered…1wk1W

Yes, as long as they finish their sentence (not sexual, robbery, or murder) and under strict supervision.

 @B4JZJS4answered…1wk1W

yes, but they need to finished sentence, and need to assesed if they are suitable for such a role. Also, dependign on the degree of crime.