+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.5k Murray-Darling voters.

39%
Yes
61%
No
16%
Yes
59%
No
21%
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
2%
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
1%
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
1%
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.5k Murray-Darling voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.5k Murray-Darling voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Murray-Darling voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9SB2X2Yanswered…8mos8MO

Yes, depends on the severity of the crime and the circumstances regarding both the context and the trial process, (ie. if it's biased)

 @9KC7CVXanswered…1yr1Y

yes, as long as the crime was minor and properly looked into/ extra support behind the scenes to be more closely watched

 @9D4R96Lanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed during office and the sentence is complete

 @9ZMSSFBanswered…4mos4MO

They should be able to because in recent years we have seen political parties weaponise the justice system to try and prevent rivals from being able to qualify for elections. The people should be able to vote and if their crimes are detestable leave that for the public to decide.

 @B4B9G5Panswered…3 days3D

Yes, citizens should be able to elect whomever they want to represent them, without limitations - even a horse!

 @B497RZLanswered…5 days5D

So long as as the crimes was not committed while in office and have finished serving their sentence.

 @B494M8Kanswered…5 days5D

As long as they have finished serving their sentence and have changed and are under watch, yes, they should have the chance to change the line of their life