+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1k 3004 voters.

41%
Yes
59%
No
17%
Yes
58%
No
21%
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
1%
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
2%
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
1%
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1k 3004 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1k 3004 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from 3004 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9SB2X2Yanswered…4mos4MO

Yes, depends on the severity of the crime and the circumstances regarding both the context and the trial process, (ie. if it's biased)

 @9KC7CVXanswered…9mos9MO

yes, as long as the crime was minor and properly looked into/ extra support behind the scenes to be more closely watched

 @9D4R96Lanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed during office and the sentence is complete

 @9ZNMKQBanswered…2wks2W

Not unless the case can be fully ensured to have been done fairly and without bias. This involves making the evidence and legal procedure transparent and accessible to the public.

 @9ZMSSFBanswered…2wks2W

They should be able to because in recent years we have seen political parties weaponise the justice system to try and prevent rivals from being able to qualify for elections. The people should be able to vote and if their crimes are detestable leave that for the public to decide.

 @9WV63JDanswered…1mo1MO

Yes, depending on the seriousness of the crime and as long as they have finished serving their sentence

 @9WK3YJPanswered…1mo1MO

i think they should as long as it wasnt a sexual offence or aanything in the office or a serious serious crime