+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 571 Rankin voters.

32%
Yes
68%
No
14%
Yes
65%
No
15%
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
2%
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
2%
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
1%
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 571 Rankin voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 571 Rankin voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Rankin voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9SB2X2Yanswered…3mos3MO

Yes, depends on the severity of the crime and the circumstances regarding both the context and the trial process, (ie. if it's biased)

 @9KC7CVXanswered…9mos9MO

yes, as long as the crime was minor and properly looked into/ extra support behind the scenes to be more closely watched

 @9D4R96Lanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed during office and the sentence is complete

 @9ZMSSFBanswered…3 days3D

They should be able to because in recent years we have seen political parties weaponise the justice system to try and prevent rivals from being able to qualify for elections. The people should be able to vote and if their crimes are detestable leave that for the public to decide.

 @9WV63JDanswered…4wks4W

Yes, depending on the seriousness of the crime and as long as they have finished serving their sentence

 @9WK3YJPanswered…4wks4W

i think they should as long as it wasnt a sexual offence or aanything in the office or a serious serious crime

 @9WGQCN5answered…1mo1MO

It depends on the crime, the nature of it and if they seem to have tried to use it as a lesson to not repeat there same mistake in future