Try the political quiz
+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 29.7k Australia voters.

61%
39%

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 29.7k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 29.7k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B5B7FR4answered…1yr1Y

Yes but with consideration for the aesthetic and also keeping strict boundaries on housing prices. It should be affordable and attainable but also aspirational

 @9LPB4H8answered…2yrs2Y

Yes but other infrastructure such as public transport, roads, parking and healthcare etc need to be able to support this

 @BF3VPRRanswered…1wk1W

 @Blopenta_1 answered…2wks2W

Yes, but surveys should be conducted on local residents for preference and to maintain local authority

 @BDWMQ32answered…3wks3W

Depends on the areas they incentivise and the population. Certain regions should not be covered with residential buildings.

About This Data

Based on 29.7k responses to this question.

These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).

iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.

Read Our Full Methodology →

Cite Or Embed This Poll

Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.

Cite This Poll

iSideWith. (2026). “Should the government incentivize the construction of high density residential buildings?” — Public Opinion Poll Results. Retrieved June 26, 2026, from https://australia.isidewith.com/polls/5115312297

Embed The Live Result

Preview