No

Well planned and community focused high density buildings are much better than the 180sqm houses we are currently building.

High Density residential buildings increase the supply of affordable housing and people should be able to afford a decent home. These homes are also proven to be more environmentally friendly.

This is the only way to meet the growing population in the cities. No one wants to like 50km from a cbd in woop woop

More low density buildings in important areas of a suburb such as shopping centres and/or train stations is not efficient and doesn't give access to services for the most people.

We should be focusing on cheap and affordable housing, giving families an opportunity to live comfortably is the only way to raise healthy children.

If affordable and prevents more people becoming homeless then who cares where the housing is. Id rather have a roof over my head than nothing.

Everyone deserves the opportunity to live somewhere affordable that is close to public services and employment opportunities.

High density residential buildings allow more people to live in the same amount of space. It helps transit-oriented development, developing the area further and giving more people a roof over their head. Since it increases the supply, it also decreases the house prices. There is literally nothing bad about high density residential buildings.

Urban sprawl leads to larger, further-spaced cities which increases car-dependency and deforestation. Urban sprawl is also economically inviable as it produces less tax revenue than higher density suburbs.