+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 371k Australia voters.

68%
Yes
32%
No
58%
Yes
26%
No
7%
Yes, but provide treatment for those testing positive
5%
No, only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse
2%
Yes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians
2%
No, this is a waste of time and money
1%
Yes, and immediately terminate benefits for anyone testing positive

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 371k Australia voters.

Chart
Line chart with 9 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 371k Australia voters.

Chart
Line chart with 10 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9VPTBW3answered…4mos4MO

No, only if they have a history (criminal or otherwise) with class A illegal drugs. I would not waste the time or money to include anything legally prescribed aka cannabis.

 @9HJY34Ranswered…1yr1Y

Yes, if they have a history and are exhibiting the signs of drug abuse after an interview with a professional

 @9JJBTWFanswered…1yr1Y

if they have a history of drugs, there should be a way to track spendings from the goverment point, so they can see if they are evn buying drugs

 @9HKY377answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only if a trained employee sees the typical signs of addiction/substance abuse, and after they refer this recipient to an onsite specialist who comes to the same conclusion should they be tested (or voluntary)

 @9JXWD39answered…1yr1Y

Yes, provide treatment for those who test positive, and test everyone earning money from the government, including employees and politicians.

 @B343QT2answered…22hrs22H

Yes, if they have a criminal history related to drug use. If they test positive, then treatment should be provided.

 @B33GS6Zanswered…2 days2D

Yes, recipients should be tested and if found to have a positive result they should get mandatory assistance but if they are a reoccurring problem then removing them from the programs

 @B32DK5Nanswered…4 days4D

No, substance abuse is typically indicative of mental health and socio-economic struggles. They're symptomatic of larger issues that first needs to be addressed