+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 7.6k Melbourne Ports voters.

63%
Yes
37%
No
53%
Yes
30%
No
7%
Yes, but provide treatment for those testing positive
5%
No, only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse
2%
Yes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians
2%
No, this is a waste of time and money
1%
Yes, and immediately terminate benefits for anyone testing positive

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 7.6k Melbourne Ports voters.

Chart
Line chart with 9 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 7.6k Melbourne Ports voters.

Chart
Line chart with 10 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Melbourne Ports voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9VPTBW3answered…6mos6MO

No, only if they have a history (criminal or otherwise) with class A illegal drugs. I would not waste the time or money to include anything legally prescribed aka cannabis.

 @9HJY34Ranswered…1yr1Y

Yes, if they have a history and are exhibiting the signs of drug abuse after an interview with a professional

 @9JXWD39answered…1yr1Y

Yes, provide treatment for those who test positive, and test everyone earning money from the government, including employees and politicians.

 @9JJBTWFanswered…1yr1Y

if they have a history of drugs, there should be a way to track spendings from the goverment point, so they can see if they are evn buying drugs

 @9HKY377answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only if a trained employee sees the typical signs of addiction/substance abuse, and after they refer this recipient to an onsite specialist who comes to the same conclusion should they be tested (or voluntary)

 @B4BSKMWanswered…19hrs19H

No you are basically saying everyone who is on welfare is a drug user and affects mental health and is an invasion of privacy and puts a sigma on the welfare class

 @B493N5Panswered…4 days4D

Yes but only if they are then given food vouchers, free medical and are placed into courses to help them over come their addiction and are supported through this with a trained carer

 @B493GPCanswered…4 days4D

Unless prescribed by a doctor, ANYONE receiving payment from the government INCLUDING POLITICIANS should be terminated from their position.