In 2014 the government denied a proposal to subject welfare recipients to drug testing. Proponents including Liberal-National Party MP George Christensen argued that anyone receiving taxpayer funded benefits should be able to demonstrate that they are drug-free. Opponents, including Greens MP Adam Bandt, argued that if welfare recipients were subject to testing MPs should be as well.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Local Government Area
State Electorate
Response rates from 3.3k Marrickville (A) voters.
68% Yes |
32% No |
59% Yes |
27% No |
6% Yes, but provide treatment for those testing positive |
4% No, only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse |
1% Yes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians |
1% No, this is a waste of time and money |
1% Yes, and immediately terminate benefits for anyone testing positive |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.3k Marrickville (A) voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 3.3k Marrickville (A) voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Marrickville (A) voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9HJY34R12mos12MO
Yes, if they have a history and are exhibiting the signs of drug abuse after an interview with a professional
@9JXWD399mos9MO
Yes, provide treatment for those who test positive, and test everyone earning money from the government, including employees and politicians.
@9JJBTWF10mos10MO
if they have a history of drugs, there should be a way to track spendings from the goverment point, so they can see if they are evn buying drugs
@9HKY37712mos12MO
Yes, but only if a trained employee sees the typical signs of addiction/substance abuse, and after they refer this recipient to an onsite specialist who comes to the same conclusion should they be tested (or voluntary)
@9ZMSSFB5 days5D
Illicit class 1 drugs like heroin, meth & cocaine, yes. But not for marijuana. If marijuana is off limits there is no scientific reason that alcohol should be allowed. The only notated cognitive effect from heavy, long-term marijuana usage is impairment to the short-term memory. Alcohol negatively impacts every part of the brain. If people are allowed alcohol there is no reason they shouldn’t be allowed marijuana
@9ZDJCJR2wks2W
Yes, provide treatment for those who test positive more than twice in 3 months and put restrictions in place to reduce access.
@9WK97VN1mo1MO
Yes, but for those who have a history or suspected of drug abuse and if they test positive. They should be allocated treatment and help while also facing a disciplinary action to the appropriate degree.
@9VCFLZ32mos2MO
i think drug testing should only be relevant after a certian period of time or randomly but it should not take thier welfare away but instead recieve help.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
