+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 15.2k Australia voters.

46%
Yes
54%
No
46%
Yes
54%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 15.2k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 15.2k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZZ7YJ3answered…3mos3MO

No, any backdoor that exists for national security purposes also exists for anyone else clever enough to find it. There is no such thing as a backdoor that only specific people can use.

 @B2WPRX8answered…1wk1W

Government should only be targeting criminals and have policies and procedures in place to avoiding harming innocent people and pay for any damages caused to those innocent people

 @B2JP85Qanswered…4wks4W

No but increase spending for programs that infiltrate drug, sex trafficking and other illegal operations

 @9ZLXJRXanswered…3mos3MO

Under strict conditions. Don’t want government investigating people for disagreeing with government policy

 @9WV5Y6Zanswered…4mos4MO

Possibly, again, this appears to be for of a federal government question. Sounds suspicious or not in depth with detail etc.

 @9WR5QQWanswered…4mos4MO

Tech campanies should be required only when there is sufficient reason to believe activities pertaining to the risk of national security are occuring, it should not be by default.

 @9WK3YLPanswered…4mos4MO

maybe but there needs to be new regulations put in place to protect privecy such as needing a worrant for someting to do that kind of investigation

 @9WBP9K5answered…4mos4MO

Like bugging and telephone wire taps in the past, it would seem reasonable for gov agencies to have access where a reasonable suspicion exists and a magistrate has granted access.